research-article

Yes: Affirmative Consent as a Theoretical Framework for Understanding and Imagining Social Platforms

Authors:

Katherine Mustelier,

Mark S. Ackerman,

Eric GilbertAuthors Info & Claims

CHI '21: Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

Article No.: 403, Pages 1 - 18

https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445778

Published: 07 May 2021 Publication History

Abstract

Affirmative consent is the idea that someone must ask for, and earn, enthusiastic approval before interacting with someone else. For decades, feminist activists and scholars have used affirmative consent to theorize and prevent sexual assault. In this paper, we ask: Can affirmative consent help to theorize online interaction? Drawing from feminist, legal, and HCI literature, we introduce the feminist theory of affirmative consent and use it to analyze social computing systems. We present affirmative consent’s five core concepts: it is voluntary, informed, revertible, specific, and unburdensome. Using these principles, this paper argues that affirmative consent is both an explanatory and generative theoretical framework. First, affirmative consent is a theoretical abstraction for explaining various problematic phenomena in social platforms—including mass online harassment, revenge porn, and problems with content feeds. Finally, we argue that affirmative consent is a generative theoretical foundation from which to imagine new design ideas for consentful socio-technical systems.

References

[1]

Antonia Abbey, Pam McAuslan, and Lisa Thomson Ross. 1998. Sexual assault perpetration by college men: The role of alcohol, misperception of sexual intent, and sexual beliefs and experiences. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology 17, 2 (1998), 167–195. https://doi.org/10.1521/jscp.1998.17.2.167

[2]

Mark S Ackerman. 2000. The Intellectual Challenge of CSCW: The Gap Between Social Requirements and Technical Feasibility. Human–Computer Interaction 15, 2-3 (2000), 179–203. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327051HCI1523_5

Digital Library

[3]

Zhraa A. Alhaboby, Haider M. al Khateeb, James Barnes, and Emma Short. 2016. ‘The language is disgusting and they refer to my disability’: the cyberharassment of disabled people. Disability & Society 31, 8 (2016), 1138–1143. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2016.1235313

[4]

Nazanin Andalibi and Andrea Forte. 2018. Announcing Pregnancy Loss on Facebook: A Decision-Making Framework for Stigmatized Disclosures on Identified Social Network Sites. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Montreal QC, Canada) (CHI ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3173732

Digital Library

[5]

Nazanin Andalibi and Andrea Forte. 2018. Responding to Sensitive Disclosures on Social Media: A Decision-Making Framework. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 25, 6, Article 31 (Dec. 2018), 29 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3241044

Digital Library

[6]

Shaowen Bardzell. 2010. Feminist HCI: Taking Stock and Outlining an Agenda for Design. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Atlanta, Georgia, USA) (CHI ’10). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1301–1310. https://doi.org/10.1145/1753326.1753521

Digital Library

[7]

Laina Y Bay-Cheng and Rebecca K Eliseo-Arras. 2008. The making of unwanted sex: Gendered and neoliberal norms in college women’s unwanted sexual experiences. Journal of Sex Research 45, 4 (2008), 386–397. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224490802398381

[8]

Joseph B Bayer, Penny Trieu, and Nicole B Ellison. 2020. Social Media Elements, Ecologies, and Effects. Annual review of psychology 71 (2020), 471–497. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010419-050944

[9]

Anja Bechmann. 2014. Non-informed consent cultures: Privacy policies and app contracts on Facebook. Journal of Media Business Studies 11, 1 (2014), 21–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/16522354.2014.11073574

[10]

Melanie Beres. 2010. Sexual miscommunication? Untangling assumptions about sexual communication between casual sex partners. Culture, health & sexuality 12, 1 (2010), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691050903075226

[11]

Melanie A Beres. 2007. ‘Spontaneous’ sexual consent: An analysis of sexual consent literature. Feminism & Psychology 17, 1 (2007), 93–108. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959353507072914

[12]

Melanie Ann Beres. 2014. Rethinking the concept of consent for anti-sexual violence activism and education. Feminism & Psychology 24, 3 (2014), 373–389. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959353514539652

[13]

Melanie A Beres, Edward Herold, and Scott B Maitland. 2004. Sexual consent behaviors in same-sex relationships. Archives of Sexual Behavior 33, 5 (2004), 475–486. https://doi.org/10.1023/b:aseb.0000037428.41757.10

[14]

Melanie A Beres, Charlene Y Senn, and Jodee McCaw. 2014. Navigating ambivalence: How heterosexual young adults make sense of desire differences. The Journal of Sex Research 51, 7 (2014), 765–776. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2013.792327

[15]

Jeremy Birnholtz, Moira Burke, and Annie Steele. 2017. Untagging on social media: Who untags, what do they untag, and why?Computers in Human Behavior 69 (2017), 166–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.12.008

Digital Library

[16]

Michele Black, Kathleen Basile, Matthew Breiding, Sharon Smith, Mikel Walters, Melissa Merrick, Jieru Chen, and Mark Stevens. 2011. National intimate partner and sexual violence survey: 2010 summary report. (2011).

[17]

Lindsay Blackwell, Jill Dimond, Sarita Schoenebeck, and Cliff Lampe. 2017. Classification and Its Consequences for Online Harassment: Design Insights from HeartMob. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 1, CSCW, Article 24 (Dec. 2017), 19 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3134659

Digital Library

[18]

Lindsay Blackwell, Nicole Ellison, Natasha Elliott-Deflo, and Raz Schwartz. 2019. Harassment in Social Virtual Reality: Challenges for Platform Governance. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 3, CSCW, Article 100 (Nov. 2019), 25 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3359202

Digital Library

[19]

Melissa Blake. 2018. On disability, Twitter is better late than never. https://www.cnn.com/2018/04/13/opinions/twitter-changes-terms-on-disability-blake-opinion/index.html

[20]

Our Data Bodies. 2016. Our Data Bodies. Retrieved March 15, 2020 from https://www.odbproject.org/

[21]

Jed R Brubaker, Gillian R Hayes, and Paul Dourish. 2013. Beyond the grave: Facebook as a site for the expansion of death and mourning. The Information Society 29, 3 (2013), 152–163. https://doi.org/10.1080/01972243.2013.777300

Digital Library

[22]

Leah Burch. 2018. ‘You are a parasite on the productive classes’: online disablist hate speech in austere times. Disability & Society 33, 3 (2018), 392–415. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2017.1411250

[23]

Melissa Burkett and Karine Hamilton. 2012. Postfeminist sexual agency: Young women’s negotiations of sexual consent. Sexualities 15, 7 (2012), 815–833. https://doi.org/10.1177/1363460712454076

[24]

Judith Butler. 2011. Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203824979

[25]

Ralf Caers, Tim De Feyter, Marijke De Couck, Talia Stough, Claudia Vigna, and Cind Du Bois. 2013. Facebook: A literature review. New media & society 15, 6 (2013), 982–1002. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444813488061

[26]

Moira Carmody. 2005. Ethical erotics: Reconceptualizing anti-rape education. Sexualities 8, 4 (2005), 465–480. https://doi.org/10.1177/1363460705056621

[27]

Moira Carmody. 2009. Conceptualising the prevention of sexual assault and the role of education. (2009).

[28]

University of Guelph Central Student Association. [n.d.]. No Means No. Retrieved March 15, 2020 from https://csaonline.ca/campaigns/no-means-no

[29]

Scott Chacon and Ben Straub. 2014. Pro git. Apress. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4842-0076-6

[30]

Eshwar Chandrasekharan, Chaitrali Gandhi, Matthew Wortley Mustelier, and Eric Gilbert. 2019. Crossmod: A Cross-Community Learning-Based System to Assist Reddit Moderators. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 3, CSCW, Article 174 (Nov. 2019), 30 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3359276

Digital Library

[31]

John Joon Young Chung, Jean Y. Song, Sindhu Kutty, Sungsoo (Ray) Hong, Juho Kim, and Walter S. Lasecki. 2019. Efficient Elicitation Approaches to Estimate Collective Crowd Answers. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 3, CSCW, Article 62, 25 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3359164

Digital Library

[32]

Danielle Keats Citron and Mary Anne Franks. 2014. Criminalizing revenge porn. Wake Forest L. Rev. 49(2014), 345.

[33]

Douglas E Comer. 2013. Internetworking with TCP/IP. Addison-Wesley Professional.

[34]

Sasha Costanza-Chock. 2020. Design justice: Community-led practices to build the worlds we need. MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/12255.001.0001

[35]

Maddy Coy, Liz Kelly, Fiona Vera-Gray, Maria Garner, and Ava Kanyeredzi. 2016. From ‘no means no’ to ‘an enthusiastic yes’: Changing the discourse on sexual consent through sex and relationships education. In Global perspectives and key debates in sex and relationships education: Addressing issues of gender, sexuality, plurality and power. Springer, 84–99. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137500229_6

[36]

Jena Nicols Curtis and Susan Burnett. 2017. Affirmative Consent: What Do College Student Leaders Think About “Yes Means Yes” as the Standard for Sexual Behavior?American Journal of Sexuality Education 12, 3 (2017), 201–214. https://doi.org/10.1080/15546128.2017.1328322

[37]

Elizabeth Dartnall and Rachel Jewkes. 2013. Sexual violence against women: the scope of the problem. Best practice & research Clinical obstetrics & gynaecology 27, 1(2013), 3–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2012.08.002

[38]

Guy Davies. 2020. Coronavirus misinformation on WhatsApp is going viral, despite steps to combat its spread. Retrieved May 17, 2020 from https://abcnews.go.com/Health/coronavirus-misinformation-whatsapp-viral-steps-combat-spread/story?id=69688321

[39]

Michela Del Vicario, Alessandro Bessi, Fabiana Zollo, Fabio Petroni, Antonio Scala, Guido Caldarelli, H Eugene Stanley, and Walter Quattrociocchi. 2016. The spreading of misinformation online. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 113, 3 (2016), 554–559. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1517441113

[40]

David Dennis Jr.2020. A blessing and a curse: The rich history behind ‘Black Twitter’. https://theundefeated.com/features/a-blessing-and-a-curse-the-rich-history-behind-black-twitter/

[41]

Michael A DeVito. 2017. From editors to algorithms: A values-based approach to understanding story selection in the Facebook news feed. Digital Journalism 5, 6 (2017), 753–773. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2016.1178592

[42]

Michael A. DeVito, Jeremy Birnholtz, Jeffery T. Hancock, Megan French, and Sunny Liu. 2018. How People Form Folk Theories of Social Media Feeds and What It Means for How We Study Self-Presentation. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Montreal QC, Canada) (CHI ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3173694

Digital Library

[43]

Nicholas Diakopoulos and Michael Koliska. 2017. Algorithmic transparency in the news media. Digital Journalism 5, 7 (2017), 809–828.

[44]

Jill P. Dimond, Michaelanne Dye, Daphne Larose, and Amy S. Bruckman. 2013. Hollaback! The Role of Storytelling Online in a Social Movement Organization. In Proceedings of the 2013 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (San Antonio, Texas, USA) (CSCW ’13). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 477–490. https://doi.org/10.1145/2441776.2441831

Digital Library

[45]

Jill P. Dimond, Casey Fiesler, and Amy S Bruckman. 2011. Domestic violence and information communication technologies. Interacting with Computers 23, 5 (2011), 413–421. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intcom.2011.04.006

Digital Library

[46]

Judith Donath. 2007. Signals in social supernets. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 13, 1 (2007), 231–251. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00394.x

Digital Library

[47]

Maeve Duggan. 2017. Online harassment 2017. (2017). https://ncvc.dspacedirect.org/handle/20.500.11990/10

[48]

Michele P Dyson, Lisa Hartling, Jocelyn Shulhan, Annabritt Chisholm, Andrea Milne, Purnima Sundar, Shannon D Scott, and Amanda S Newton. 2016. A systematic review of social media use to discuss and view deliberate self-harm acts. PloS one 11, 5 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0155813

[49]

Josh Dzieza. 2015. Facebook’s new nostalgia feature is already bringing up painful memories. The Verge (2015). https://www.theverge.com/2015/4/2/8315897/facebook-on-this-day-nostalgia-app-bringing-back-painful-memories

[50]

Catherine D’Ignazio and Lauren F Klein. 2016. Feminist data visualization. In Workshop on Visualization for the Digital Humanities (VIS4DH), Baltimore. IEEE.

[51]

Motahhare Eslami, Karrie Karahalios, Christian Sandvig, Kristen Vaccaro, Aimee Rickman, Kevin Hamilton, and Alex Kirlik. 2016. First I “like” It, Then I Hide It: Folk Theories of Social Feeds. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (San Jose, California, USA) (CHI ’16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2371–2382. https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858494

Digital Library

[52]

Motahhare Eslami, Aimee Rickman, Kristen Vaccaro, Amirhossein Aleyasen, Andy Vuong, Karrie Karahalios, Kevin Hamilton, and Christian Sandvig. 2015. “I Always Assumed That I Wasn’t Really That Close to [Her]”: Reasoning about Invisible Algorithms in News Feeds. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Seoul, Republic of Korea) (CHI ’15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 153–162. https://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702556

Digital Library

[53]

Breanne Fahs and Sara I McClelland. 2016. When sex and power collide: An argument for critical sexuality studies. The Journal of Sex Research 53, 4-5 (2016), 392–416. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2016.1152454

[54]

Heather A. Faucett, Kate E. Ringland, Amanda L. L. Cullen, and Gillian R. Hayes. 2017. (In)Visibility in Disability and Assistive Technology. ACM Trans. Access. Comput. 10, 4, Article 14 (Oct. 2017), 17 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3132040

Digital Library

[55]

Jan Fernback and Zizi Papacharissi. 2007. Online privacy as legal safeguard: the relationship among consumer, online portal, and privacy policies. New Media & Society 9, 5 (2007), 715–734. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444807080336

[56]

Casey Fiesler, Shannon Morrison, and Amy S. Bruckman. 2016. An Archive of Their Own: A Case Study of Feminist HCI and Values in Design. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (San Jose, California, USA) (CHI ’16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2574–2585. https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858409

Digital Library

[57]

Sarah Fox, Rachel Rose Ulgado, and Daniela Rosner. 2015. Hacking Culture, Not Devices: Access and Recognition in Feminist Hackerspaces. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing (Vancouver, BC, Canada) (CSCW ’15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 56–68. https://doi.org/10.1145/2675133.2675223

Digital Library

[58]

Deen Freelon, Lori Lopez, Meredith D Clark, and Sarah J Jackson. 2018. How Black Twitter and other social media communities interact with mainstream news. (2018). https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/nhsd9

[59]

Seth Frey, P. M. Krafft, and Brian C. Keegan. 2019. ”This Place Does What It Was Built For”: Designing Digital Institutions for Participatory Change. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 3, CSCW, Article 32 (Nov. 2019), 31 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3359134

Digital Library

[60]

Batya Friedman, Edward Felten, and Lynette I Millett. 2000. Informed consent online: A conceptual model and design principles. University of Washington Computer Science & Engineering Technical Report 00–12–2 8(2000).

[61]

Batya Friedman, Daniel C Howe, and Edward Felten. 2002. Informed consent in the Mozilla browser: Implementing value-sensitive design. In Proceedings of the 35th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/hicss.2002.994366

[62]

Jaclyn Friedman and Jessica Valenti. 2019. Yes means yes!: Visions of female sexual power and a world without rape. Seal Press.

[63]

Hannah Frith. 2013. Sexual scripts, sexual refusals and rape. In Rape. Willan, 122–145.

[64]

Katie Z. Gach and Jed R. Brubaker. 2020. Experiences of Trust in Postmortem Profile Management. Trans. Soc. Comput. 3, 1, Article 2 (Feb. 2020), 26 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3365525

Digital Library

[65]

Harold Garfinkel. 1984. Studies in ethnomethodology. (1984).

[66]

R Kelly Garrett and Paul Resnick. 2011. Resisting political fragmentation on the Internet. Daedalus 140, 4 (2011), 108–120. https://doi.org/10.1162/daed_a_00118

[67]

Nicola Gavey. 2013. Just sex?: The cultural scaffolding of rape. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429443220

[68]

Rosa Gavey. 2019. Affirmative Consent to Sex: Is It Enough. New Zealand Women’s Law Journal 3 (2019), 35.

[69]

Anthony Giddens. 1984. The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. Univ of California Press.

[70]

Eric Gilbert and Karrie Karahalios. 2009. Predicting Tie Strength with Social Media. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Boston, MA, USA) (CHI ’09). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 211–220. https://doi.org/10.1145/1518701.1518736

Digital Library

[71]

Jen Gilbert. 2018. Contesting consent in sex education. Sex Education 18, 3 (2018), 268–279. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681811.2017.1393407

[72]

Cole Gleason, Patrick Carrington, Cameron Cassidy, Meredith Ringel Morris, Kris M. Kitani, and Jeffrey P. Bigham. 2019. “It’s Almost like They’re Trying to Hide It”: How User-Provided Image Descriptions Have Failed to Make Twitter Accessible. In The World Wide Web Conference(San Francisco, CA, USA) (WWW ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 549–559. https://doi.org/10.1145/3308558.3313605

Digital Library

[73]

Cole Gleason, Patrick Carrington, Lydia B. Chilton, Benjamin M. Gorman, Hernisa Kacorri, Andrés Monroy-Hernández, Meredith Ringel Morris, Garreth W. Tigwell, and Shaomei Wu. 2019. Addressing the Accessibility of Social Media. In Conference Companion Publication of the 2019 on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (Austin, TX, USA) (CSCW ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 474–479. https://doi.org/10.1145/3311957.3359439

Digital Library

[74]

Cole Gleason, Amy Pavel, Emma McCamey, Christina Low, Patrick Carrington, Kris M. Kitani, and Jeffrey P. Bigham. 2020. Twitter A11y: A Browser Extension to Make Twitter Images Accessible. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Honolulu, HI, USA) (CHI ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376728

Digital Library

[75]

Vindu Goel, Suhasini Raj, and Priyadarshini Ravichandran. 2018. How WhatsApp leads mobs to murder in India. The New York Times 18(2018). https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2018/07/18/technology/whatsapp-india-killings.html

[76]

Lise Gotell. 2008. Rethinking affirmative consent in Canadian sexual assault law: Neoliberal sexual subjects and risky women. Akron L. Rev. 41(2008), 865.

[77]

Kishonna L. Gray. 2012. INTERSECTING OPPRESSIONS AND ONLINE COMMUNITIES. Information, Communication & Society 15, 3 (2012), 411–428. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2011.642401

[78]

Kishonna L Gray. 2014. Race, Gender, and Deviance in Xbox Live: Theoretical Perspectives from the Virtual Margins. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315721378

[79]

Rachel E. Greenspan. 2020. People keep sharing the video of George Floyd. Some activists and mental health professionals are calling it ‘pain porn’ and begging them to stop.https://www.insider.com/george-floyd-video-activists-are-begging-people-stop-posting-2020-5

[80]

E Grinberg. 2014. Schools preach ‘enthusiastic’ yes in sex consent education. CNN. https://www.cnn.com/2014/09/03/living/affirmative-consent-school-policy/index.html

[81]

Oliver Haimson. 2018. Social Media as Social Transition Machinery. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 2, CSCW, Article 63 (Nov. 2018), 21 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3274332

Digital Library

[82]

Oliver L. Haimson, Jed R. Brubaker, Lynn Dombrowski, and Gillian R. Hayes. 2016. Digital Footprints and Changing Networks During Online Identity Transitions. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (San Jose, California, USA) (CHI ’16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2895–2907. https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858136

Digital Library

[83]

Oliver L Haimson, Avery Dame-Griff, Elias Capello, and Zahari Richter. 2019. Tumblr was a trans technology: the meaning, importance, history, and future of trans technologies. Feminist Media Studies(2019), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2019.1678505

[84]

Oliver L. Haimson, Dykee Gorrell, Denny L. Starks, and Zu Weinger. 2020. Designing Trans Technology: Defining Challenges and Envisioning Community-Centered Solutions. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Honolulu, HI, USA) (CHI ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376669

Digital Library

[85]

David S Hall. 1998. Consent for sexual behavior in a college student population. Electronic Journal of Human Sexuality 1, 10 (1998), 1–16.

[86]

Janet Halley. 2016. The move to affirmative consent. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 42, 1 (2016), 257–279. https://doi.org/10.1086/686904

[87]

Jean Hardy and Silvia Lindtner. 2017. Constructing a Desiring User: Discourse, Rurality, and Design in Location-Based Social Networks. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (Portland, Oregon, USA) (CSCW ’17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 13–25. https://doi.org/10.1145/2998181.2998347

Digital Library

[88]

Averi Harper. 2020. How viral videos of killings of black men take a toll on black male mental health. https://abcnews.go.com/Health/viral-videos-killings-black-men-takes-toll-black/story?id=70909409

[89]

Kate Lockwood Harris. 2009. The communicative criterion: Establishing a new standard for non-violent sexual encounters by reframing consent. thirdspace: a journal of feminist theory & culture 9, 1 (2009).

[90]

Stuart Henry and Dragan Milovanovic. 1996. Constitutive criminology: Beyond postmodernism. SAGE Publications Limited. https://doi.org/10.1163/157181797X00518

[91]

Salvador Hernandez. 2020. A Zoom Meeting For Women Of Color Was Hijacked By Trolls Shouting The N-Word. Retrieved May 25, 2020 from https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/salvadorhernandez/zoom-coronavirus-racist-zoombombing

[92]

Susan E Hickman and Charlene L Muehlenhard. 1999. “By the semi-mystical appearance of a condom”: How young women and men communicate sexual consent in heterosexual situations. Journal of Sex Research 36, 3 (1999), 258–272. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499909551996

[93]

Noah Hilgert. 2016. The Burden of Consent: Due Process and the Emerging Adoption of the Affirmative Consent Standard in Sexual Assault Laws. Ariz. L. Rev. 58(2016), 867.

[94]

Wendy Adele Humphrey. 2016. Let’s Talk about Sex: Legislating and Educating on the Affirmative Consent Standard. USFL Rev. 50(2016), 35. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2780124

[95]

Terry Humphreys and Ed Herold. 2007. Sexual consent in heterosexual relationships: Development of a new measure. Sex Roles 57, 3-4 (2007), 305–315. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-007-9264-7

[96]

Terry P Humphreys. 2004. Understanding sexual consent: An empirical investigation of the normative script for young heterosexual adults. Making sense of sexual consent(2004), 209–225.

[97]

Jane Im, Sonali Tandon, Eshwar Chandrasekharan, Taylor Denby, and Eric Gilbert. 2020. Synthesized Social Signals: Computationally-Derived Social Signals from Account Histories. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Honolulu, HI, USA) (CHI ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376383

Digital Library

[98]

Cyber Civil Rights Initiative. 2012. Cyber Civil Rights Initiative. Retrieved March 15, 2020 from https://www.cybercivilrights.org/

[99]

Steven J. Jackson, Tarleton Gillespie, and Sandy Payette. 2014. The Policy Knot: Re-Integrating Policy, Practice and Design in Cscw Studies of Social Computing. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing (Baltimore, Maryland, USA) (CSCW ’14). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 588–602. https://doi.org/10.1145/2531602.2531674

Digital Library

[100]

Shagun Jhaver, Iris Birman, Eric Gilbert, and Amy Bruckman. 2019. Human-Machine Collaboration for Content Regulation: The Case of Reddit Automoderator. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 26, 5, Article 31 (July 2019), 35 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3338243

Digital Library

[101]

Shagun Jhaver, Larry Chan, and Amy Bruckman. 2018. The view from the other side: The border between controversial speech and harassment on Kotaku in Action. First Monday 23, 2 (2018). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v23i2.8232

[102]

Shagun Jhaver, Sucheta Ghoshal, Amy Bruckman, and Eric Gilbert. 2018. Online Harassment and Content Moderation: The Case of Blocklists. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 25, 2, Article 12 (March 2018), 33 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3185593

Digital Library

[103]

Maritza Johnson, Serge Egelman, and Steven M Bellovin. 2012. Facebook and privacy: it’s complicated. In Proceedings of the eighth symposium on usable privacy and security. 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1145/2335356.2335369

Digital Library

[104]

Kristen N Jozkowski. 2015. “Yes means yes”? Sexual consent policy and college students. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning 47, 2 (2015), 16–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/00091383.2015.1004990

[105]

Sanjay Kairam, Mike Brzozowski, David Huffaker, and Ed Chi. 2012. Talking in Circles: Selective Sharing in Google+. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Austin, Texas, USA) (CHI ’12). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1065–1074. https://doi.org/10.1145/2207676.2208552

Digital Library

[106]

Gopinaath Kannabiran, Shaowen Bardzell, and Jeffrey Bardzell. 2012. Designing (for) Desire: A Critical Study of Technosexuality in HCI. In Proceedings of the 7th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Making Sense Through Design (Copenhagen, Denmark) (NordiCHI ’12). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 655–664. https://doi.org/10.1145/2399016.2399116

Digital Library

[107]

Sandy Keenan. 2015. Affirmative consent: Are students really asking. The New York Times 28(2015). https://www.nytimes.com/2015/08/02/education/edlife/affirmative-consent-are-students-really-asking.html

[108]

Os Keyes, Josephine Hoy, and Margaret Drouhard. 2019. Human-Computer Insurrection: Notes on an Anarchist HCI. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Glasgow, Scotland Uk) (CHI ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300569

Digital Library

[109]

Cliff Lampe, Nicole B. Ellison, and Charles Steinfield. 2008. Changes in Use and Perception of Facebook. In Proceedings of the 2008 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (San Diego, CA, USA) (CSCW ’08). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 721–730. https://doi.org/10.1145/1460563.1460675

Digital Library

[110]

Una Lee and Dann Toliver. 2017. Building Consentful Tech. http://www.consentfultech.io/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/Building-Consentful-Tech.pdf

[111]

Amanda Lenhart, Michele Ybarra, Kathryn Zickuhr, and Myeshia Price-Feeney. 2016. Online harassment, digital abuse, and cyberstalking in America. Data and Society Research Institute. https://www.datasociety.net/pubs/oh/Online_Harassment_2016.pdf

[112]

Lawrence Lessig. 1999. Code is law. The Industry Standard 18(1999).

[113]

Ann Light. 2011. HCI as heterodoxy: Technologies of identity and the queering of interaction with computers. Interacting with Computers 23, 5 (2011), 430–438. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intcom.2011.02.002

Digital Library

[114]

Eden Litt. 2012. Knock, knock. Who’s there? The imagined audience. Journal of broadcasting & electronic media 56, 3 (2012), 330–345. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2012.705195

[115]

Nicholas J Little. 2005. From no means no to only yes means yes: The rational results of an affirmative consent standard in rape law. Vand. L. Rev. 58(2005), 1321.

[116]

Kathleen Ann Livingston. 2015. The queer art & rhetoric of consent: Theories, practices, pedagogies. Michigan State University.

[117]

Taylor Lorenz and Davey Albay. 2020. ‘Zoombombing’ Becomes a Dangerous Organized Effort. Retrieved May 25, 2020 from https://www.nytimes.com/2020/04/03/technology/zoom-harassment-abuse-racism-fbi-warning.html

[118]

Kaitlin Mahar, Amy X. Zhang, and David Karger. 2018. Squadbox: A Tool to Combat Email Harassment Using Friendsourced Moderation. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Montreal QC, Canada) (CHI ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3174160

Digital Library

[119]

David Malki. 2014. The Terrible Sea Lion. Retrieved May 20, 2020 from http://wondermark.com/1k62/

[120]

Alice E Marwick and Danah Boyd. 2011. I tweet honestly, I tweet passionately: Twitter users, context collapse, and the imagined audience. New media & society 13, 1 (2011), 114–133. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444810365313

[121]

Alice E Marwick and Ross Miller. 2014. Online harassment, defamation, and hateful speech: A primer of the legal landscape. Fordham Center on Law and Information Policy Report2 (2014). http://ssrn.com/abstract=2447904

[122]

J Matias, Amy Johnson, Whitney Erin Boesel, Brian Keegan, Jaclyn Friedman, and Charlie DeTar. 2015. Reporting, reviewing, and responding to harassment on Twitter. Available at SSRN 2602018(2015). https://arxiv.org/pdf/1505.03359.pdf

[123]

Tara Matthews, Kathleen O’Leary, Anna Turner, Manya Sleeper, Jill Palzkill Woelfer, Martin Shelton, Cori Manthorne, Elizabeth��F. Churchill, and Sunny Consolvo. 2017. Stories from Survivors: Privacy & Security Practices When Coping with Intimate Partner Abuse. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Denver, Colorado, USA) (CHI ’17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2189–2201. https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025875

Digital Library

[124]

Aleecia M McDonald and Lorrie Faith Cranor. 2008. The cost of reading privacy policies. Isjlp 4(2008), 543.

[125]

Eric Meyer. 2014. Inadvertent algorithmic cruelty. Thoughts From Eric 24(2014). https://meyerweb.com/eric/thoughts/2014/12/24/inadvertent-algorithmic-cruelty/

[126]

Anne Mitchell, Rachel Peart, and Doreen Rosenthal. 1996. Can We Do Better than Negative Consent?: teenagers negotiating sexual encounters. Schooling and Sexualities: Teaching for a positive sexuality. Laskey L. and Beavis, C., Deakin University(1996).

[127]

Mainack Mondal, Johnnatan Messias, Saptarshi Ghosh, Krishna P Gummadi, and Aniket Kate. 2016. Forgetting in social media: Understanding and controlling longitudinal exposure of socially shared data. In Twelfth Symposium on Usable Privacy and Security ({SOUPS} 2016). 287–299.

[128]

Charlene L Muehlenhard, Terry P Humphreys, Kristen N Jozkowski, and Zoë D Peterson. 2016. The complexities of sexual consent among college students: A conceptual and empirical review. The Journal of Sex Research 53, 4-5 (2016), 457–487. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2016.1146651

[129]

Jake New. 2014. The “yes means yes” world. Inside Higher Ed (2014).

[130]

Mark EJ Newman. 2013. Spectral methods for community detection and graph partitioning. Physical Review E 88, 4 (2013), 042822. https://doi.org/10.1103/physreve.88.042822

[131]

Josef Nguyen and Bonnie Ruberg. 2020. Challenges of Designing Consent: Consent Mechanics in Video Games as Models for Interactive User Agency. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Honolulu, HI, USA) (CHI ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376827

Digital Library

[132]

Midas Nouwens, Ilaria Liccardi, Michael Veale, David Karger, and Lalana Kagal. 2020. Dark Patterns after the GDPR: Scraping Consent Pop-Ups and Demonstrating Their Influence. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Honolulu, HI, USA) (CHI ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376321

Digital Library

[133]

INCITE! Women of Color Against Violence. 2016. Color of Violence The INCITE! Anthology. (2016). https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822373445

[134]

Ihudiya Finda Ogbonnaya-Ogburu, Angela D.R. Smith, Alexandra To, and Kentaro Toyama. 2020. Critical Race Theory for HCI. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Honolulu, HI, USA) (CHI ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376392

Digital Library

[135]

Gary M Olson and Judith S Olson. 1997. Research on computer supported cooperative work. In Handbook of human-computer interaction. Elsevier, 1433–1456. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-044481862-1.50125-4

[136]

Lucia F O’Sullivan and Michelle E Gaines. 1998. Decision-making in college students’ heterosexual dating relationships: Ambivalence about engaging in sexual activity. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships 15, 3(1998), 347–363. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407598153003

[137]

Zizi Papacharissi. 2010. Privacy as a luxury commodity. First Monday 15, 8 (2010). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v15i8.3075

[138]

Jessica A. Pater, Oliver L. Haimson, Nazanin Andalibi, and Elizabeth D. Mynatt. 2016. “Hunger Hurts but Starving Works”: Characterizing the Presentation of Eating Disorders Online. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing (San Francisco, California, USA) (CSCW ’16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1185–1200. https://doi.org/10.1145/2818048.2820030

Digital Library

[139]

Lois Pineau. 1989. Date rape: A feminist analysis. Law and Philosophy 8, 2 (1989), 217–243. https://doi.org/10.2307/3504696

[140]

Anthony T. Pinter, Jialun Aaron Jiang, Katie Z. Gach, Melanie M. Sidwell, James E. Dykes, and Jed R. Brubaker. 2019. “Am I Never Going to Be Free of All This Crap?”: Upsetting Encounters with Algorithmically Curated Content About Ex-Partners. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 3, CSCW, Article 70 (Nov. 2019), 23 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3359172

Digital Library

[141]

CODE OF FEDERAL REGULATIONS. 2009. Protection of human subjects. National Institutes of Health Office for Protection from Research Risks. Title 45(2009). https://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/sites/default/files/ohrp/humansubjects/regbook2013.pdf.pdf

[142]

Gustavo Resende, Philipe Melo, Julio C. S. Reis, Marisa Vasconcelos, Jussara M. Almeida, and Fabrício Benevenuto. 2019. Analyzing Textual (Mis)Information Shared in WhatsApp Groups. In Proceedings of the 10th ACM Conference on Web Science (Boston, Massachusetts, USA) (WebSci ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 225–234. https://doi.org/10.1145/3292522.3326029

Digital Library

[143]

Paul Resnick, R. Kelly Garrett, Travis Kriplean, Sean A. Munson, and Natalie Jomini Stroud. 2013. Bursting Your (Filter) Bubble: Strategies for Promoting Diverse Exposure. In Proceedings of the 2013 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work Companion (San Antonio, Texas, USA) (CSCW ’13). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 95–100. https://doi.org/10.1145/2441955.2441981

Digital Library

[144]

Eugenia Ha Rim Rho and Melissa Mazmanian. 2019. Hashtag Burnout? A Control Experiment Investigating How Political Hashtags Shape Reactions to News Content. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 3, CSCW, Article 197 (Nov. 2019), 25 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3359299

Digital Library

[145]

Sarah T Roberts. 2019. Behind the screen: Content moderation in the shadows of social media. Yale University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvhrcz0v

[146]

Jennifer A Rode. 2011. A theoretical agenda for feminist HCI. Interacting with Computers 23, 5 (2011), 393–400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intcom.2011.04.005

Digital Library

[147]

Jon Ronson. 2015. How one stupid tweet blew up Justine Sacco’s life. New York Times 12(2015). https://www.nytimes.com/2015/02/15/magazine/how-one-stupid-tweet-ruined-justine-saccos-life.html

[148]

Jeffrey Rosen. 2011. The right to be forgotten. Stan. L. Rev. Online 64(2011), 88.

[149]

Stephanie Rosen. 2017. Accessibility for justice: Accessibility as a tool for promoting justice in librarianship. (2017).

[150]

Emily F Rothman, Deinera Exner, and Allyson L Baughman. 2011. The prevalence of sexual assault against people who identify as gay, lesbian, or bisexual in the United States: A systematic review. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse 12, 2 (2011), 55–66. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838010390707

[151]

Florian Schaub, Rebecca Balebako, Adam L Durity, and Lorrie Faith Cranor. 2015. A design space for effective privacy notices. In Eleventh Symposium On Usable Privacy and Security ({SOUPS} 2015). 1–17.

[152]

Morgan Klaus Scheuerman, Stacy M. Branham, and Foad Hamidi. 2018. Safe Spaces and Safe Places: Unpacking Technology-Mediated Experiences of Safety and Harm with Transgender People. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 2, CSCW, Article 155 (Nov. 2018), 27 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3274424

Digital Library

[153]

Elizabeth M Schneider. 1993. Feminism and the false dichotomy of victimization and agency. NYL Sch. L. Rev. 38(1993), 387.

[154]

B Schwartz. 2004. The paradox of choice: Why more is less. New York, NY, US.

[155]

Lorna JF Smith. 1989. Concerns about rape. HM Stationery Office.

[156]

Tanya Somanader. 2014. President Obama launches the “It’s On Us” campaign to end sexual assault on campus. The White House (2014). https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/blog/2014/09/19/president-obama-launches-its-us-campaign-end-sexual-assault-campus

[157]

Roseanna Sommers and Vanessa K Bohns. 2018. The voluntariness of voluntary consent: Consent searches and the psychology of compliance. Yale LJ 128(2018), 1962.

[158]

Marcy Strauss. 2001. Reconstructing consent. J. Crim. L. & Criminology 92 (2001), 211. https://doi.org/10.2307/1144211

[159]

Angelika Strohmayer, Mary Laing, and Rob Comber. 2017. Technologies and Social Justice Outcomes in Sex Work Charities: Fighting Stigma, Saving Lives. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Denver, Colorado, USA) (CHI ’17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 3352–3364. https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025615

Digital Library

[160]

Norman Makoto Su, Amanda Lazar, Jeffrey Bardzell, and Shaowen Bardzell. 2019. Of Dolls and Men: Anticipating Sexual Intimacy with Robots. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 26, 3, Article 13 (May 2019), 35 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3301422

Digital Library

[161]

Sharifa Sultana, François Guimbretière, Phoebe Sengers, and Nicola Dell. 2018. Design Within a Patriarchal Society: Opportunities and Challenges in Designing for Rural Women in Bangladesh. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Montreal QC, Canada) (CHI ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3174110

Digital Library

[162]

Lee Taber and Steve Whittaker. 2020. “On Finsta, I Can Say ‘Hail Satan’”: Being Authentic but Disagreeable on Instagram. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Honolulu, HI, USA) (CHI ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376182

Digital Library

[163]

Penny Trieu and Nancy K. Baym. 2020. Private Responses for Public Sharing: Understanding Self-Presentation and Relational Maintenance via Stories in Social Media. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Honolulu, HI, USA) (CHI ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376549

Digital Library

[164]

Anupriya Tuli, Shruti Dalvi, Neha Kumar, and Pushpendra Singh. 2019. “It’s a Girl Thing”: Examining Challenges and Opportunities around Menstrual Health Education in India. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 26, 5, Article 29 (July 2019), 24 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3325282

Digital Library

[165]

Ashley Marie Walker and Michael A. DeVito. 2020. ”’More Gay’ Fits in Better”: Intracommunity Power Dynamics and Harms in Online LGBTQ+ Spaces. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Honolulu, HI, USA) (CHI ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376497

Digital Library

[166]

Hue Watson, Eyitemi Moju-Igbene, Akanksha Kumari, and Sauvik Das. 2020. “We Hold Each Other Accountable”: Unpacking How Social Groups Approach Cybersecurity and Privacy Together. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Honolulu, HI, USA) (CHI ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376605

Digital Library

[167]

Malachi Willis and Kristen N. Jozkowski. 2018. Barriers to the Success of Affirmative Consent Initiatives: An Application of the Social Ecological Model. American Journal of Sexuality Education 13, 3 (2018), 324–336. https://doi.org/10.1080/15546128.2018.1443300

[168]

Sijia Xiao, Danaë Metaxa, Joon Sung Park, Karrie Karahalios, and Niloufar Salehi. 2020. Random, Messy, Funny, Raw: Finstas as Intimate Reconfigurations of Social Media. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Honolulu, HI, USA) (CHI ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376424

Digital Library

[169]

Amy X. Zhang and Justin Cranshaw. 2018. Making Sense of Group Chat through Collaborative Tagging and Summarization. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 2, CSCW, Article 196 (Nov. 2018), 27 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3274465

Digital Library

[170]

Amy X Zhang, Grant Hugh, and Michael S Bernstein. 2020. PolicyKit: Building Governance in Online Communities. arXiv preprint arXiv:2008.04236(2020).

[171]

Matteo Zignani, Sabrina Gaito, and Gian Paolo Rossi. 2018. Follow the “Mastodon”: Structure and Evolution of a Decentralized Online Social Network. In Twelfth International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media.

Cited By

Nigri LKang H(2024)Undercover Assistance: Designing a Disguised App to Navigate Sexual HarassmentAdjunct Proceedings of the 37th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology10.1145/3672539.3686332(1-3)Online publication date: 13-Oct-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3672539.3686332
Qiwei LLameiro FPatel SIsaula-Reyes CAdar EGilbert ESchoenebeck S(2024)Feminist Interaction Techniques: Social Consent Signals to Deter NCIM ScreenshotsProceedings of the 37th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology10.1145/3654777.3676380(1-14)Online publication date: 13-Oct-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3654777.3676380
Cheng RWang RZimmermann TFord D(2024)“It would work for me too”: How Online Communities Shape Software Developers’ Trust in AI-Powered Code Generation ToolsACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems10.1145/365199014:2(1-39)Online publication date: 15-May-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3651990
Show More Cited By

Index Terms

Yes: Affirmative Consent as a Theoretical Framework for Understanding and Imagining Social Platforms
1. Human-centered computing
2. Social and professional topics
  1. Computing / technology policy

Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

Recommendations

What Can HCI Learn from Sexual Consent?: A Feminist Process of Embodied Consent for Interactions with Emerging Technologies
CHI '21: Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

Sexual consent has undergone a transformation toward an “enthusiastic” feminist model that emphasizes consent as an ongoing and voluntary process of negotiation and affirmation. This paper considers how such a model can advance understandings of consent ...
Online Dating as Context to Design Sexual Consent Technology with Women and LGBTQ+ Stakeholders
CHI '23: Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

This paper uses online dating as a context to explore futures for sexual consent technology: systems that mediate how partners exchange consent in order to prevent nonconsensual sex. Motivated by evidence that sexual consent is already mediated by ...
Dark Patterns and the Legal Requirements of Consent Banners: An Interaction Criticism Perspective
CHI '21: Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

User engagement with data privacy and security through consent banners has become a ubiquitous part of interacting with internet services. While previous work has addressed consent banners from either interaction design, legal, and ethics-focused ...

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences

CHI '21: Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

May 2021

10862 pages

ISBN:9781450380966

DOI:10.1145/3411764

General Chairs:
Yoshifumi Kitamura
Tohoku University, Japan
,
Aaron Quigley
University of New South Wales, Australia
,
Program Chairs:
Katherine Isbister
University of California Santa Cruz, USA
,
Takeo Igarashi
The University of Tokyo, Japan
,
Publications Chairs:
Pernille Bjørn
University of Copenhagen, Denmark
,
Steven Drucker
Microsoft Research, USA

Copyright © 2021 ACM.

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

Sponsors

SIGCHI: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 07 May 2021

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Badges

Honorable Mention

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Research-article
Research
Refereed limited

Funding Sources

National Science Foundation

Conference

CHI '21

Sponsor:

SIGCHI

CHI '21: CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

May 8 - 13, 2021

Yokohama, Japan

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 6,199 of 26,314 submissions, 24%

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

44
Total Citations
View Citations
1,824
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)367
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)54

Reflects downloads up to 22 Oct 2024

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Nigri LKang H(2024)Undercover Assistance: Designing a Disguised App to Navigate Sexual HarassmentAdjunct Proceedings of the 37th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology10.1145/3672539.3686332(1-3)Online publication date: 13-Oct-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3672539.3686332
Qiwei LLameiro FPatel SIsaula-Reyes CAdar EGilbert ESchoenebeck S(2024)Feminist Interaction Techniques: Social Consent Signals to Deter NCIM ScreenshotsProceedings of the 37th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology10.1145/3654777.3676380(1-14)Online publication date: 13-Oct-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3654777.3676380
Cheng RWang RZimmermann TFord D(2024)“It would work for me too”: How Online Communities Shape Software Developers’ Trust in AI-Powered Code Generation ToolsACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems10.1145/365199014:2(1-39)Online publication date: 15-May-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3651990
Huang ESarma AHwang SChandrasekharan EChancellor S(2024)Opportunities, tensions, and challenges in computational approaches to addressing online harassmentProceedings of the 2024 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference10.1145/3643834.3661623(1483-1498)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3643834.3661623
Armstrong TLeong TBuckingham Shum Svan den Hoven E(2024)"This is the kind of experience I want to have": Supporting the experiences of queer young men on social platforms through designProceedings of the 2024 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference10.1145/3643834.3661564(1681-1700)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3643834.3661564
Kim HLee JJang JKim J(2024)ReSPect: Enabling Active and Scalable Responses to Networked Online HarassmentProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36373948:CSCW1(1-30)Online publication date: 26-Apr-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3637394
Tseng EBellini RLee YRamjit ARistenpart TDell N(2024)Data Stewardship in Clinical Computer Security: Balancing Benefit and Burden in Participatory SystemsProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36373168:CSCW1(1-29)Online publication date: 26-Apr-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3637316
Register YGrasso IWeingarten LFury LChinea CMalloy TSpiro E(2024)Beyond Initial Removal: Lasting Impacts of Discriminatory Content Moderation to Marginalized Creators on InstagramProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36373008:CSCW1(1-28)Online publication date: 26-Apr-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3637300
Zong JMatias J(2024)Data Refusal from Below: A Framework for Understanding, Evaluating, and Envisioning Refusal as DesignACM Journal on Responsible Computing10.1145/36301071:1(1-23)Online publication date: 20-Mar-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3630107
Ajmani LStapleton LHoutti MChancellor S(2024)Data Agency Theory: A Precise Theory of Justice for AI ApplicationsProceedings of the 2024 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency10.1145/3630106.3658930(631-641)Online publication date: 3-Jun-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3630106.3658930
Show More Cited By

View Options

Get Access

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Publication

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format.

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

View Table of Contents