research-article

Trials and Tribulations of Novices Working with the Arduino

Authors:

Kayla DesPortes,

Betsy DiSalvoAuthors Info & Claims

ICER '19: Proceedings of the 2019 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research

Pages 219 - 227

https://doi.org/10.1145/3291279.3339427

Published: 30 July 2019 Publication History

Abstract

Physical computing has grown over the past decade leading to diverse experiences and tools for novices. Despite the variety of tools, Arduinos remain a leading choice in education. However, few studies examine how novices are learning about the programming and electronics concepts, and how tools impact their experience. The research presented reports on the qualitative analysis of a laboratory study in which 31 novices work with the Arduino for the first time. Video and audio recordings captured participants' actions and thoughts as they used the Arduino platform with a blocks-based programming environment, and two electronics prototyping tools-the standard Breadboard and a modular breadboard called BitBlox. The study presents three main contributions to the literature: first, it provides a codebook of the common breakdowns faced by novices; second, it offers insight into the work processes of novices; and third, it demonstrates ways that the tools used by novices can affect their experience.

References

[1]

Ahmadzadeh, M. et al. 2005. An analysis of patterns of debugging among novice computer science students. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin. 37, 3 (Sep. 2005), 84.

Digital Library

[2]

Bandura, A. 2006. Guide for constructing self-efficacy scales. Self-efficacy beliefs of adolescents. 5, 307--337 (2006).

[3]

Blikstein, P. 2015. Computationally Enhanced Toolkits for Children: Historical Review and a Framework for Future Design. Foundations and Trends® in Human--Computer Interaction. 9, 1 (2015), 1--68.

Digital Library

[4]

Blikstein, P. 2013. Digital fabrication and 'making' in education: The democratization of invention. FabLabs: Of Machines, Makers and Inventors. (2013), 1--21.

[5]

Booth, T. et al. 2016. Crossed Wires: Investigating the Problems of End-User Developers in a Physical Computing Task. Proceedings of the 2016 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (2016), 3485--3497.

Digital Library

[6]

Booth, T. and Stumpf, S. 2013. End-user experiences of visual and textual programming environments for Arduino. International Symposium on End User Development. (2013).

[7]

Buechley, L. and Eisenberg, M. 2008. The LilyPad Arduino: Toward wearable engineering for everyone. Pervasive Computing, IEEE. 7, 2 (2008), 12--15.

Digital Library

[8]

De Vries, H. et al. 2008. Using Pooled Kappa to Summarize Interrater Agreement across Many Items. Field Methods. 20, 3 (Mar. 2008), 272--282.

[9]

Deitrick, E. et al. 2015. Using Distributed Cognition Theory to Analyze Collaborative Computer Science Learning. (2015), 51--60.

Digital Library

[10]

DesPortes, K. et al. 2016. BitBlox: A Redesign of the Breadboard. Proceedings of the The 15th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children (2016), 255--261.

Digital Library

[11]

DesPortes, K. et al. 2016. Interdisciplinary Computing and the Emergence of Boundary Objects: A Case-Study of Dance and Technology. International Society of the Learning Sciences. (In Press 2016).

[12]

DesPortes, K. et al. 2016. The MoveLab: Developing Congruence Between Students' Self-Concepts and Computing. Proceedings of the 47th ACM Technical Symposium on Computing Science Education (2016), 267--272.

Digital Library

[13]

DesPortes, K. and DiSalvo, B. 2017. Where are the Glass-Boxes?: Examining the Spectrum of Modularity in Physical Computing Hardware Tools. (2017), 292--297.

Digital Library

[14]

Dittert, N. 2014. TechSportiv: constructing objects-to-think-with for physical education. Proceedings of the 8th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Fun, Fast, Foundational (2014), 569--577.

Digital Library

[15]

Drew, D. et al. 2016. The toastboard: Ubiquitous instrumentation and automated checking of breadboarded circuits. Proceedings of the 29th Annual Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (2016), 677--686.

Digital Library

[16]

Edwards, S.H. 2004. Using software testing to move students from trial-and-error to reflection-in-action. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin. 36, 1 (Mar. 2004), 26.

Digital Library

[17]

Ericsson, A. and Simon, H.A. 1980. Verbal Reports as Data + Ericsson.pdf. Psychological review. 87, 3 (1980), 215.

[18]

Fields, D.A. et al. 2016. Deconstruction kits for learning: Students' collaborative debugging of electronic textile designs. Proceedings of the 6th Annual Conference on Creativity and Fabrication in Education (2016), 82--85.

Digital Library

[19]

Grover, R. et al. 2014. A competition-based approach for undergraduate mechatronics education using the arduino platform. Fourth Interdisciplinary Engineering Design Education Conference (2014), 78--83.

[20]

Hartmann, B. et al. What Would Other Programmers Do? Suggesting Solutions to Error Messages. 10.

[21]

Inspire every child to create their best digital future: 2019. https://microbit.org/about/. Accessed: 2019-04-01.

[22]

Introducing Circuit Playground: 2016. https://learn.adafruit.com/introducing-circuit-playground/overview. Accessed: 2019-04-01.

[23]

Jayathirtha, G. et al. 2018. Computational concepts, practices, and collaboration in high school students' debugging electronic textile projects. Proceedings of International Conference on Computational Thinking Education (2018).

[24]

Jung, M.F. et al. 2014. Participatory materials: having a reflective conversation with an artifact in the making. Proceedings of the 2014 conference on Designing interactive systems (2014), 25--34.

Digital Library

[25]

Kaczmarczyk, L.C. et al. 2010. Identifying student misconceptions of programming. Proceedings of the 41st ACM technical symposium on Computer science education (2010), 107--111.

Digital Library

[26]

Kafai, Y.B. et al. 2014. A Crafts-Oriented Approach to Computing in High School: Introducing Computational Concepts, Practices, and Perspectives with Electronic Textiles. ACM Transactions on Computing Education. 14, 1 (Mar. 2014), 1--20.

Digital Library

[27]

Lee, M.J. and Ko, A.J. Personifying Programming Tool Feedback Improves Novice Programmers? Learning. 8.

[28]

Murphy, L. et al. Debugging: The Good, the Bad, and the Quirky -- a Qualitative Analysis of Novices' Strategies. 5.

Digital Library

[29]

Osborne, R. 1983. Towards modifying children's ideas about electric current. Research in Science & Technological Education. 1, 1 (1983), 73--82.

[30]

Papert, S. 1993. Mindstorms: Children, computers, and powerful ideas. Basic Books.

Digital Library

[31]

Peppler, K. and Glosson, D. 2013. Stitching Circuits: Learning About Circuitry Through E-textile Materials. Journal of Science Education and Technology. 22, 5 (Oct. 2013), 751--763.

[32]

Perlman, R. 1974. "TORTIS: Toddler's Own Recursive Turtle Interpreter System.

[33]

Ramalingam, V. and Wiedenbeck, S. 1998. Development and validation of scores on a computer programming self-efficacy scale and group analyses of novice programmer self-efficacy. Journal of Educational Computing Research. 19, 4 (1998), 367--381.

[34]

Raspberry Pi/Pi Zero/Pi Zero V1.3: 2019. https://www.adafruit.com/category/934'src=raspberrypi. Accessed: 2019-04-01.

[35]

Resnick, M. 1995. New Paradigms for Computing, New Paradigms for Thinking. Computers and Exploratory Learning (Berlin, 1995), 31--43.

[36]

Sadler, J. et al. 2017. Building blocks in creative computing: modularity increases the probability of prototyping novel ideas. International Journal of Design Creativity and Innovation. 5, 3--4 (Oct. 2017), 168--184.

[37]

Searle, K. et al. 2016. The E-Textiles Bracelet Hack: Bringing Making to Middle School Classrooms. Proceedings of the 6th Annual Conference on Creativity and Fabrication in Education (Standford, CA, 2016), 107--110.

Digital Library

[38]

Severance, C. 2014. Massimo Banzi: Building Arduino. Computer. 47, 1 (2014), 11--12.

Digital Library

[39]

Sipitakiat, A. et al. 2004. GoGo board: augmenting programmable bricks for economically challenged audiences. Proceedings of the 6th international conference on Learning sciences (2004), 481--488.

Digital Library

[40]

Turkle, S. and Papert, S. 1990. Epistemological pluralism. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society. 1, 16 (1990), 11.

[41]

Wagh, A. et al. 2017. The Role of Computational Thinking Practices in Making: How Beginning Youth Makers Encounter & Appropriate CT Practices in Making. Proceedings of the 7th Annual Conference on Creativity and Fabrication in Education (Standford, CA, 2017), 1--8.

Digital Library

[42]

Weintrop, D. and Wilensky, U. 2015. To block or not to block, that is the question: students' perceptions of blocks-based programming. Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children (2015), 199--208.

Digital Library

[43]

Weintrop, D. and Wilensky, U. 2015. Using Commutative Assessments to Compare Conceptual Understanding in Blocks-based and Text-based Programs. Proceedings of the eleventh annual International Conference on International Computing Education Research (2015), 101--110.

Digital Library

[44]

Weintrop, D. and Wilensky, U. 2015. Using Commutative Assessments to Compare Conceptual Understanding in Blocks-based and Text-based Programs. (2015), 101--110.

Digital Library

[45]

Zhang, X. et al. 2018. Design and Practice of Arduino Experiments for "E&I" Oriented Education. Proceedings of ACM Turing Celebration Conference-China (China, 2018), 21--26.

Digital Library

[46]

2019. List of Arduino boards and compatible systems. Wikipedia.

Cited By

Hennessy Elliott CNixon JGendrau Chakarov ABush JSchneider MRecker M(2024)Characterizing teacher support of debugging with physical computing: Debugging pedagogies in practiceACM Transactions on Computing Education10.1145/3677612Online publication date: 9-Sep-2024
https://doi.org/10.1145/3677612
Byrne DDesportes KHowell NLouw MSterman STorres C(2024)Advancing Creative Physical Computing Education: Designing, Sharing, and Taxonomizing Instructional InterventionsCompanion Publication of the 2024 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference10.1145/3656156.3658396(385-388)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3656156.3658396
Deliema DBye JMarupudi V(2024)Debugging Pathways: Open-Ended Discrepancy Noticing, Causal Reasoning, and InterveningACM Transactions on Computing Education10.1145/365011524:2(1-34)Online publication date: 10-May-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3650115
Show More Cited By

Index Terms

Trials and Tribulations of Novices Working with the Arduino
1. Social and professional topics
  1. Professional topics
    1. Computing education
      1. Computing education programs
        Computational science and engineering education

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences

ICER '19: Proceedings of the 2019 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research

July 2019

375 pages

ISBN:9781450361859

DOI:10.1145/3291279

General Chairs:
Robert McCartney
University of Connecticut, USA
,
Andrew Petersen
University of Toronto Mississauga, Canada
,
Anthony Robins
University of Otago, New Zealand
,
Adon Moskal
Otago Polytechnic, New Zealand
,
Program Chairs:
Robert McCartney
University of Connecticut, USA
,
Anthony Robins
University of Otago, New Zealand

Copyright © 2019 ACM.

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

Sponsors

SIGCSE: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer Science Education

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 30 July 2019

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Research-article

Conference

ICER '19

Sponsor:

SIGCSE

ICER '19: International Computing Education Research Conference

August 12 - 14, 2019

Toronto ON, Canada

Acceptance Rates

ICER '19 Paper Acceptance Rate 28 of 137 submissions, 20%;

Overall Acceptance Rate 189 of 803 submissions, 24%

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

21
Total Citations
View Citations
522
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)101
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)37

Reflects downloads up to 23 Oct 2024

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Hennessy Elliott CNixon JGendrau Chakarov ABush JSchneider MRecker M(2024)Characterizing teacher support of debugging with physical computing: Debugging pedagogies in practiceACM Transactions on Computing Education10.1145/3677612Online publication date: 9-Sep-2024
https://doi.org/10.1145/3677612
Byrne DDesportes KHowell NLouw MSterman STorres C(2024)Advancing Creative Physical Computing Education: Designing, Sharing, and Taxonomizing Instructional InterventionsCompanion Publication of the 2024 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference10.1145/3656156.3658396(385-388)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3656156.3658396
Deliema DBye JMarupudi V(2024)Debugging Pathways: Open-Ended Discrepancy Noticing, Causal Reasoning, and InterveningACM Transactions on Computing Education10.1145/365011524:2(1-34)Online publication date: 10-May-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3650115
Scheirer CZhong VKulkarni SZaman MDesportes KCastro F(2024)touchBase: A Tangible Programming Language for Physical ComputingProceedings of the 16th Conference on Creativity & Cognition10.1145/3635636.3664253(464-469)Online publication date: 23-Jun-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3635636.3664253
Morales-Navarro LFields DBarapatre DKafai YStephenson BStone JBattestilli LRebelsky SShoop L(2024)Failure Artifact Scenarios to Understand High School Students' Growth in Troubleshooting Physical Computing ProjectsProceedings of the 55th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education V. 110.1145/3626252.3630855(874-880)Online publication date: 7-Mar-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3626252.3630855
Morales-Navarro LFields DKafai Y(2024)Understanding growth mindset practices in an introductory physical computing classroom: high school students’ engagement with debugging by design activitiesComputer Science Education10.1080/08993408.2024.2317080(1-31)Online publication date: 13-Feb-2024
https://doi.org/10.1080/08993408.2024.2317080
UYSAL HOCAK M(2023)Çevrimiçi Arduino Programlama Öğretiminde Bağlılık ve Özyeterlilik AlgısıPerception of Engagement and Self-Efficacy in Online Arduino InstructionAkademik Açı10.59597/akademikaci.12977503:2(53-100)Online publication date: 18-Oct-2023
https://doi.org/10.59597/akademikaci.1297750
Speer SGarcia-Alonzo AHuang JYankova NRosé CPeppler KMccann JOrta Martinez M(2023)SPEERLoom: An Open-Source Loom Kit for Interdisciplinary Engagement in Math, Engineering, and TextilesProceedings of the 36th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology10.1145/3586183.3606724(1-15)Online publication date: 29-Oct-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3586183.3606724
Schneider M(2023)Designing scaffolds to support students in debugging e-textilesProceedings of the 22nd Annual ACM Interaction Design and Children Conference10.1145/3585088.3593925(766-768)Online publication date: 19-Jun-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3585088.3593925
Ryan ZDeLiema D(2023)Reflections on sustained debugging support: conjecture mapping as a point of departure for instructor feedback on designInstructional Science10.1007/s11251-023-09629-551:6(1043-1078)Online publication date: 24-Apr-2023
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-023-09629-5
Show More Cited By

View Options

Get Access

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Publication

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

View Table of Contents