skip to main content
research-article

Large-scale, parallel automatic patent annotation

Published: 30 October 2008 Publication History

Abstract

When researching new product ideas or filing new patents, inventors need to retrieve all relevant pre-existing know-how and/or to exploit and enforce patents in their technological domain. However, this process is hindered by lack of richer metadata, which if present, would allow more powerful concept-based search to complement the current keyword-based approach. This paper presents our approach to automatic patent enrichment, tested in large-scale, parallel experiments on USPTO and EPO documents. It starts by defining the metadata annotation task and examines its challenges. The text analysis tools are presented next, including details on automatic annotation of sections, references and measurements. The key challenges encountered were dealing with ambiguities and errors in the data; creation and maintenance of large, domain-independent dictionaries; and building an efficient, robust patent analysis pipeline, capable of dealing with terabytes of data. The accuracy of automatically created metadata is evaluated against a human-annotated gold standard, with results of over 90% on most annotation types.

References

[1]
N. Aswani, V. Tablan, K. Bontcheva, and H. Cunningham. Indexing and Querying Linguistic Metadata and Document Content. In Proceedings of Fifth International Conference on Recent Advances in Natural Language Processing (RANLP2005), Borovets, Bulgaria, 2005.
[2]
D. Bikel, R. Schwartz, and R. Weischedel. An Algorithm that Learns What's in a Name. Machine Learning, Special Issue on Natural Language Learning, 34(1-3), Feb. 1999.
[3]
N. Chinchor. Muc-4 evaluation metrics. In Proceedings of the Fourth Message Understanding Conference, pages 22--29, 1992.
[4]
H. Cunningham. Information Extraction, Automatic. Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, 2nd Edition, pages 665--677, 2005.
[5]
H. Cunningham, D. Maynard, K. Bontcheva, and V. Tablan. GATE: A Framework and Graphical Development Environment for Robust NLP Tools and Applications. In Proceedings of the 40th Anniversary Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL'02), 2002.
[6]
H. Cunningham, D. Maynard, K. Bontcheva, V. Tablan, and C. Ursu. The GATE User Guide. http://gate.ac.uk/, 2002.
[7]
D. Day, P. Robinson, M. Vilain, and A. Yeh. MITRE: Description of the Alembic System Used for MUC-7. In Proceedings of the Seventh Message Understanding Conference (MUC-7), 1998.
[8]
M. Dean, G. Schreiber, S. Bechhofer, F. van Harmelen, J. Hendler, I. Horrocks, D. L. McGuinness, P. F. Patel-Schneider, and L. A. Stein. OWL web ontology language reference. W3C recommendation, W3C, Feb 2004. http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-ref/.
[9]
D. Hull, S. Ait-Mokhatar, M. Chuat, A. Eisele, E. Gaussier, G. Grefenstette, P. Isabelle, C. Samuelsson, and F. Segond. Language technologies and patent search and classification. World Patent Information, 23:265--268, 2001.
[10]
A. Kiryakov. OWLIM: balancing between scalable repository and light-weight reasoner. In Proc. of WWW2006, Edinburgh, Scotland, 2006.
[11]
Y. Li, K. Bontcheva, and H. Cunningham. SVM Based Learning System For Information Extraction. In M. N. J. Winkler and N. Lawerence, editors, Deterministic and Statistical Methods in Machine Learning, LNAI 3635, pages 319--339. Springer Verlag, 2005.
[12]
D. Maynard, K. Bontcheva, and H. Cunningham. Towards a semantic extraction of Named Entities. In Recent Advances in Natural Language Processing, Bulgaria, 2003.
[13]
D. Maynard, V. Tablan, C. Ursu, H. Cunningham, and Y. Wilks. Named Entity Recognition from Diverse Text Types. In Recent Advances in Natural Language Processing 2001 Conference, pages 257--274, Tzigov Chark, Bulgaria, 2001.
[14]
B. Popov, A. Kiryakov, D. Ognyanoff, D. Manov, and A. Kirilov. KIM - A semantic platform for information extraction and retrieval. Natural Language Engineering, 10:375--392, 2004.
[15]
C. van Rijsbergen. Information Retrieval. Butterworths, London, 1979.
[16]
L. Wanner, R. Baeza-Yates, S. Brugmann, J. Codina, B. Diallo, E. Escorsa, M. Giereth, Y. Kompatsiaris, S. Papadopoulos, E. Pianta, G. Piella, I. Puhlmann, G. Rao, M. Rotard, P. Schoester, L. Serafini, and V. Zervaki. Towards Content-oriented Patent Document Processing. World Patent Information, 30(1):21--33, 2008.

Cited By

View all
  • (2023)Unveiling the inventive process from patents by extracting problems, solutions and advantages with natural language processingExpert Systems with Applications10.1016/j.eswa.2023.120499229(120499)Online publication date: Nov-2023
  • (2020)Parameter tuning Naïve Bayes for automatic patent classificationWorld Patent Information10.1016/j.wpi.2020.10196861(101968)Online publication date: Jun-2020
  • (2020)PatSeg: A Sequential Patent Segmentation ApproachBig Data Research10.1016/j.bdr.2020.100133(100133)Online publication date: May-2020
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
PaIR '08: Proceedings of the 1st ACM workshop on Patent information retrieval
October 2008
48 pages
ISBN:9781605582566
DOI:10.1145/1458572
  • General Chair:
  • John Tait
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 30 October 2008

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. GATE
  2. information extraction
  3. large-scale
  4. parallel
  5. patent enrichment

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Conference

CIKM08
CIKM08: Conference on Information and Knowledge Management
October 30, 2008
California, Napa Valley, USA

Acceptance Rates

PaIR '08 Paper Acceptance Rate 7 of 13 submissions, 54%;
Overall Acceptance Rate 7 of 13 submissions, 54%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)5
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
Reflects downloads up to 24 Oct 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2023)Unveiling the inventive process from patents by extracting problems, solutions and advantages with natural language processingExpert Systems with Applications10.1016/j.eswa.2023.120499229(120499)Online publication date: Nov-2023
  • (2020)Parameter tuning Naïve Bayes for automatic patent classificationWorld Patent Information10.1016/j.wpi.2020.10196861(101968)Online publication date: Jun-2020
  • (2020)PatSeg: A Sequential Patent Segmentation ApproachBig Data Research10.1016/j.bdr.2020.100133(100133)Online publication date: May-2020
  • (2019)Automatic Identification and Normalisation of Physical Measurements in Scientific LiteratureProceedings of the ACM Symposium on Document Engineering 201910.1145/3342558.3345411(1-4)Online publication date: 23-Sep-2019
  • (2018)A Semi-Automatic Annotation Method of Effect Clue Words for Chinese Patents Based on Co-TrainingInternational Journal of Data Warehousing and Mining10.4018/IJDWM.201810010114:4(1-19)Online publication date: 1-Oct-2018
  • (2018)Multi-Documents Summarization Based on TextRank and its Application in Online Argumentation PlatformInternational Journal of Data Warehousing and Mining10.4018/IJDWM.201807010414:3(69-89)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2018
  • (2016)Prior-Art Relevance Ranking Based on the Examiner’s Query Log ContentChallenging Problems and Solutions in Intelligent Systems10.1007/978-3-319-30165-5_15(323-333)Online publication date: 26-Mar-2016
  • (2014)Limitations of Automatic Patent IRDatenbank-Spektrum10.1007/s13222-014-0149-y14:1(5-17)Online publication date: 6-Feb-2014
  • (2013)Patent RetrievalFoundations and Trends in Information Retrieval10.1561/15000000277:1(1-97)Online publication date: 20-Feb-2013
  • (2013)GATE TeamwareLanguage Resources and Evaluation10.1007/s10579-013-9215-647:4(1007-1029)Online publication date: 1-Dec-2013
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

Get Access

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media