The QuVis Quantum Mechanics Visualization project aims to address challenges of quantum mechanics instruction through the development of interactive simulations for the learning and teaching of quantum mechanics. In this article, we describe the evaluation of simulations focusing on two-level systems developed as part of the Institute of Physics Quantum Physics resources. Simulations are research-based and have been iteratively refined using student feedback in individual observation sessions and in-class trials. We give evidence that these simulations are helping students learn quantum mechanics concepts at both the introductory and advanced undergraduate level, and that students perceive simulations to be beneficial to their learning.

1.
D. F.
Styer
, “
Common misconceptions regarding quantum mechanics
,”
Am. J. Phys.
64
(
1
),
31
34
(
1996
).
2.
I. D.
Johnston
,
K.
Crawford
, and
P. R.
Fletcher
, “
Student difficulties in learning quantum mechanics
,”
Int. J. Sci. Educ.
20
(
4
),
427
446
(
1998
).
3.
S.
Vokos
,
P. S.
Shaffer
,
B. S.
Ambrose
, and
L. C.
McDermott
, “
Student understanding of the wave nature of matter: Diffraction and interference of particles
,”
Am. J. Phys.
68
(
S1
),
S42
S51
(
2000
).
4.
G.
Ireson
, “
The quantum understanding of pre-university physics students
,”
Phys. Educ.
35
(
1
),
15
21
(
2000
).
5.
C.
Singh
, “
Student understanding of quantum mechanics
,”
Am. J. Phys.
69
(
8
),
885
896
(
2001
).
6.
M.
Wittmann
,
R.
Steinberg
, and
E.
Redish
, “
Investigating student understanding of quantum physics: Spontaneous models of conductivity
,”
Am. J. Phys.
70
(
3
),
218
226
(
2002
).
7.
L.
Bao
and
E. F.
Redish
, “
Understanding probabilistic interpretations of physical systems: A prerequisite to learning quantum physics
,”
Am. J. Phys.
70
(
3
),
210
217
(
2002
).
8.
E.
Cataloglu
and
R. W.
Robinett
, “
Testing the development of student conceptual and visualization understanding in quantum mechanics through the undergraduate career
,”
Am. J. Phys.
70
(
3
),
238
251
(
2002
).
9.
D.
Domert
,
C.
Linder
, and
A.
Ingerman
, “
Probability as a conceptual hurdle to understanding one-dimensional quantum scattering and tunnelling
,”
Eur. J. Phys.
26
,
47
59
(
2005
).
10.
Michael C.
Wittmann
,
Jeffrey T.
Morgan
, and
Lei
Bao
, “
Addressing student models of energy loss in quantum tunnelling
,”
Eur. J. Phys.
26
(
6
),
939
950
(
2005
).
11.
C.
Singh
, “
Student understanding of quantum mechanics at the beginning of graduate instruction
,”
Am. J. Phys.
76
(
3
),
277
287
(
2008
).
12.
S. B.
McKagan
,
K. K.
Perkins
, and
C. E.
Wieman
, “
Deeper look at student learning of quantum mechanics: The case of tunneling
,”
Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res.
4
(
2
),
020103-1–18
(
2008
).
13.
A.
Mason
and
C.
Singh
, “
Do advanced physics students learn from their mistakes without explicit intervention?
Am. J. Phys.
78
(
7
),
760
767
(
2010
).
14.
G.
Zhu
and
C.
Singh
, “
Improving students' understanding of quantum measurement. I. Investigation of difficulties
,”
Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res.
8
(
1
),
010117-1–8
(
2012
).
15.
G.
Zhu
and
C.
Singh
, “
Improving student understanding of addition of angular momentum in quantum mechanics
,”
Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res.
9
(
1
)
010101-1–12
(
2013
).
16.
C.
Baily
and
N. D.
Finkelstein
, “
Teaching and understanding of quantum interpretations in modern physics courses
,”
Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res.
6
(
1
)
010101-1–11
(
2010
).
17.
M.
Michelini
,
R.
Ragazzon
,
L.
Santi
, and
A.
Stefanel
, “
Proposal for quantum physics in secondary school
,”
Phys. Educ.
35
(
6
),
406
410
(
2000
).
18.
V.
Scarani
,
L.
Chua
, and
S. Y.
Liu
,
Six Quantum Pieces: A First Course In Quantum Physics
(
World Scientific Publishing
,
Singapore
,
2010
).
19.
M.
Beck
,
Quantum Mechanics: Theory and Experiment
(
Oxford U.P.
,
New York
,
2012
).
20.
A.
Kohnle
 et al., “
A new introductory quantum mechanics curriculum
,”
Eur. J. Phys.
35
(
1
),
015001-1–9
(
2014
).
21.
M.
Malgieri
,
P.
Onorato
, and
A.
De Ambrosis
, “
Teaching quantum physics by the sum over paths approach and GeoGebra simulations
,”
Eur. J. Phys.
35
(
5
),
055024-1–21
(
2014
).
22.
A.
Kohnle
 et al., “
A new multimedia resource for teaching quantum mechanics concepts
,”
Am. J. Phys.
80
(
2
),
148
153
(
2012
).
23.
W. K.
Adams
 et al., “
A Study of Educational Simulations Part I—Engagement and Learning
,”
J. Inter. Learn. Res.
19
(
3
),
397
419
(
2008
). Available at http://www.editlib.org/p/24230/.
24.
W. K.
Adams
 et al., “
A Study of Educational Simulations Part II—Interface Design
,”
J. Inter. Learn. Res.
19
(
4
),
551
577
(
2008
). Available at http://www.editlib.org/p/24364/.
25.
S. B.
McKagan
 et al., “
Developing and researching PhET simulations for teaching quantum mechanics
,”
Am. J. Phys.
76
(
4&5
),
406
417
(
2008
); <http://phet.colorado.edu/en/simulations/category/physics/quantum-phenomena>.
26.
R. C.
Clark
and
R. E.
Mayer
,
E-Learning and the Science of Instruction
(
John Wiley
,
San Francisco
,
2011
).
27.
N. S.
Podolefsky
,
K. K.
Perkins
, and
W. K.
Adams
, “
Factors promoting engaged exploration with computer simulations
,”
Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res.
6
(
2
),
020117-1–11
(
2010
).
28.
D.
Zollman
,
S.
Rebello
, and
K.
Hogg
, “
Quantum physics for everyone: Hands-on activities integrated with technology
,”
Am. J. Phys.
70
(
3
),
252
259
(
2002
).
29.
M.
Belloni
,
W.
Christian
, and
A. J.
Cox
,
Physlet Quantum Physics: An Interactive Introduction
(
Pearson Prentice-Hall
,
Upper Saddle River, NJ
,
2006
).
30.
C.
Singh
, “
Interactive learning tutorials on quantum mechanics
,”
Am. J. Phys.
76
(
4
),
400
405
(
2008
).
32.
A.
Kohnle
,
C.
Baily
, and
S.
Ruby
, “
Investigating the influence of visualization on student understanding of quantum superposition
,” in
2014 PERC Proceedings
, edited by
P. V.
Engelhardt
,
A. D.
Churukian
, and
D. L.
Jones
, Minneapolis, MN, July 30–31, 2014.
33.
A.
Kohnle
,
C.
Baily
,
C.
Hooley
, and
B.
Torrance
, “
Optimization of simulations and activities for a new introductory quantum mechanics curriculum
,” in
2013 PERC Proceedings
, edited by
P. V.
Engelhardt
,
A. D.
Churukian
, and
D. L.
Jones
, Portland, OR, July 17–18, 2013, pp.
209
212
.
AAPT members receive access to the American Journal of Physics and The Physics Teacher as a member benefit. To learn more about this member benefit and becoming an AAPT member, visit the Joining AAPT page.