User talk:Wlodzimierz
Cao, da te pitam otkud ti fotke Markovog kaleta? Iskoristio sam jednou za stranicu Vranje
- fotoaparat u ruke i slikam =) poz
Cześć!
celowo pisałam nie tylko (jak chcą anglosasi) jedną kategorię. Oni nie mają racji: tak, jak chcą anglosasi, musisz być specjalistą biologiem, żeby coś znaleźć. To nie jest dla normalnych laików. A jeżeli chcesz znaleźć coś, i nie znasz dokładnej nazwy, nie znajdziesz niczego, chyba że masz rok czasu. To samo myślą inni (Polacy, Niemcy).
A poza tym: nazwa Mycetozoa (grzyby-zwierzęta) była używana około 1900 roku, od końca XX wieku używa się Myxomyceten, czasem Eumycetozoa. Tylko anglosasi (Anglicy i Amerykanie) używają starej nazwy systematycznej.
File:Śluzorośla 9.jpg : Protista > Amoebozoa > Myxomycota (Eumycetozoa), (według anglosasów: Mycetozoa)
File:Śluzorośla 8.jpg ( http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:%C5%9Aluzoro%C5%9Bla_8.jpg) : mało ludzi wie, że i co to Fuligo septica. Dobrze, jeżeli wiedzą, że to Myxomycota - śluzowce. A dobrze, żeby mogli się dowiedzieć, że to też Amoebozoa, a nazwa Protista jest nowa w systematyce, dobrze, żeby mogli się dowiedzieć, co to. Encyklopedia powinna uczyć, a nie tylko być dla fachowców - oni tego nie potrzebują.
Pozdrawiam Ania Anna Organiściak (talk) 23:29, 20 March 2010 (UTC)
|
Vrelo River has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
Zoupan (talk) 09:50, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
|
|
Pokrvenik has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
Ehrlich91 (talk) 22:01, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey
[edit]Hello! The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future.[survey 1] The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. To say thank you for your time, we are giving away 20 Wikimedia T-shirts to randomly selected people who take the survey.[survey 2] The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes.
You can find more information about this project. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email to surveys@wikimedia.org.
Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 20:09, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
- ↑ This survey is primarily meant to get feedback on the Wikimedia Foundation's current work, not long-term strategy.
- ↑ Legal stuff: No purchase necessary. Must be the age of majority to participate. Sponsored by the Wikimedia Foundation located at 149 New Montgomery, San Francisco, CA, USA, 94105. Ends January 31, 2017. Void where prohibited. Click here for contest rules.
Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey
[edit](Sorry to write in Engilsh)
Hello! This is a final reminder that the Wikimedia Foundation survey will close on 28 February, 2017 (23:59 UTC). The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now.
If you already took the survey - thank you! We won't bother you again.
About this survey: You can find more information about this project here or you can read the frequently asked questions. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through EmailUser function to User:EGalvez (WMF) or surveys@wikimedia.org. About the Wikimedia Foundation: The Wikimedia Foundation supports you by working on the software and technology to keep the sites fast, secure, and accessible, as well as supports Wikimedia programs and initiatives to expand access and support free knowledge globally. Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 07:59, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
Identification of File:Amanita alba Stara planina 1.JPG
[edit]
Sorry to write in English. Hello. I disagree with the use of Amanita alba as a name and I don't think that it fits for this photo. Please could you look at the talk page? Strobilomyces (talk) 18:20, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
