User talk:KirmiziAdam
Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump. |
|
Tip: Categorizing images
[edit]
Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.
Here's how:
1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:
2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.
[[Category:Category name]]
For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:
[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]
This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".
When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").
Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.CategorizationBot (talk) 11:02, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
- Image:Fuat Husnu Kayacan.jpg was uncategorized on 13 September 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:02, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
- Image:Hakansukur61.jpg was uncategorized on 10 October 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:47, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
Do not overwrite existing images from other users with your own uploads, as you did with File:Ardaturancroatia.jpg. --Túrelio (talk) 09:44, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
Im sorry, thank you. KirmiziAdam (talk) 10:30, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
File:Hakansukur.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
--Túrelio (talk) 09:50, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
I have already deleted the first version of this image, as it was a copyvio from Getty Images. Do never again upload images that belong to Getty Images agency. They take everybody to court who uses their images within paying for them. --Túrelio (talk) 10:03, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
Thank you mate KirmiziAdam (talk) 10:25, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
File:Efe award.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
--Túrelio (talk) 09:51, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
File:Hakansukur61.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
--Túrelio (talk) 09:54, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
File tagging File:Turkey 1923.jpg
[edit]This media may be deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Turkey 1923.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you. |
Túrelio (talk) 09:56, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
Stop edit-warring and read my edit-summary: To be PD, "it has to be 70 years after the death of the photographer." --Túrelio (talk) 10:01, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
You may delete it then, I didnt know that. Thank you KirmiziAdam (talk) 10:20, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
Please do not remove problem tags
[edit]
--Túrelio (talk) 10:05, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:Hakan020.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Hakan020.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file (
[[:File:Hakan020.jpg]] ).
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Denniss (talk) 10:09, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
The source is already given? KirmiziAdam (talk) 10:31, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
Wikimedia Commons does not accept derivative works of non-free works such as File:Turkey poster.jpg. It only accepts free content, which is images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Reproductions of copyrighted works are also subject to the same copyright, and therefore this file must unfortunately be considered non-free. For more information, please read Commons:Derivative works and Commons:Freedom of panorama. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.
The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that this file was not a derivative work of a non-free work, you may request undeletion.
|
Túrelio (talk) 10:13, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
I dont mind it wasnt clear anyway. Thank you KirmiziAdam (talk) 10:18, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
Please try to find out the photographers name (and life dates) for File:Hikmet t.jpg and File:Turkey 1923.jpg. By the way, is that Kemal Ata Türk in the middle of File:Turkey 1923.jpg? --Túrelio (talk) 10:21, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
I think al those images should be deleted because I do not know the names, I dont know if thats Ataturk it does look like him. KirmiziAdam (talk) 10:24, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
- How about doing some research for the names? For the old images, it is not pressing. But something has to be done, as a photographer shooting a photo in 1923 may well have lived until 1950. Then his photos might be protected until 2020. You might discuss this (or ask for help) at :tr.--Túrelio (talk) 10:28, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
Thats really hard to find out mate, Im glad you warned me about getty images thank you again, I think its better to delete those images because its really impossible to find the photographer. KirmiziAdam (talk) 10:30, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
- Well, the only one with Getty-like problems is File:Hakansukur.jpg. As I said, the old ones are not an urgent matter. They can stay open for quite some weeks. May be you have (or can find in the library) an somewhat older book about football/basketball in Turkey containing these image and eventually containing an author credit. That's what I would do in your case. But likely on :tr there is Sport portal where you may ask the experts. --Túrelio (talk) 10:40, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
I will do my best, can I contact you in case of any trouble, Im glad you warned me, I take sportpictures myself for almost 25 years now and I never knew how these things on wikipedia were done. KirmiziAdam (talk) 10:41, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
- There is no problem at all with pictures shot by yourself. You can license them as you please (so long as the license is compatible with Commons). It's a little bit more complicated with images shot by someone else.
- You can ask me or anyone at the admin board. --Túrelio (talk) 10:45, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
Thank you mate I owe you bigtime, I have one more question the file File:Hakan020.jpg. is sourced but its still saying that the source is missing. KirmiziAdam (talk) 10:46, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
- I see. User:Denniss added the no-source tag, eventually because he didn't believe the author entry. Now, honestly, this photo was originally shot by yourself? --Túrelio (talk) 10:50, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
Yes, when Sukur started playing football I was in Turkey at the time, thats the match against San Marino in 1992, it was for the World Cup qualifiers I think, I made it Black/White, the original colour photo is in my documents, I sold it a long time ago to a website that wanted to use it, dont know if they still use it. KirmiziAdam (talk) 10:58, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
- Ok, I've removed no-source-tag. But if that was in 1992, you should correct the date in the description as it says 1994. --Túrelio (talk) 11:01, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
File tagging File:Turkey_basketballteam_in_2001.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Turkey_basketballteam_in_2001.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Turkey_basketballteam_in_2001.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Polarlys (talk) 21:57, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
I made my mind, this picture can be deleted, the quality was not good anyway. Thank you KirmiziAdam (talk) 08:23, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
File:Hakan020.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Polarlys (talk) 21:58, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
This picture is my own work, Im sure we can work this out. KirmiziAdam (talk) 08:01, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
- You say File:Hakan020.jpg is your own work - it that is so, please send the form "Declaration of consent for all enquiries" from Commons:OTRS to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org Please follow the instructions from Commons:OTRS and do not upload pictures taken by other people. Thank you Hekerui (talk) 11:58, 31 October 2010 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:Galip1.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Galip1.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file (
[[:File:Galip1.jpg]] ).
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Polarlys (talk) 21:59, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
This file can be deleted. KirmiziAdam (talk) 07:54, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
Hello
ertugrul gazi statue.
very Nice Picture i really love this
so what is this link so i need it more picture of statue in turkmenistan and ertugrul gazi statue. :)
Resimler hk.
[edit]- Mrb. Anladığım kadarıyla şu resmi uzun bir zaman önce siz çekmişsiniz, doğru mu? Eğer doğruysa resmi yanlış/eksik lisans bilgisiyle yüklemişsiniz, o yüzden resim, silinmeye aday gösterilmiş. tr:Kullanıcı:Yabancı ile görüşüp, resmin hangi lisansla yükleneceği hakkında bilgi sahibi olabilir misiniz? Zira bu resim Hakan Şükür maddesi için tarihi bir önem taşıyor. Bir de resmin açıklamasını daha detaylı yapabilmeniz mümkün müdür? (şu şu tarihte, şu şu maçta çekildi gibi) Son olarak elinizde daha fazla resim varsa yükleyebilir misiniz sizin içi sorun olmazsa? İyi akşamlar...--Rapsar (talk) 15:55, 22 November 2010 (UTC)
File:Milli_takim.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Martin H. (talk) 14:55, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
File:Osman statue.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Takabeg (talk) 07:05, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
File:Ertugrul Gazi.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Takabeg (talk) 07:19, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
File:Keykubat.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Takabeg (talk) 10:28, 25 April 2012 (UTC)
File:Ertugrul Gazi.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Takabeg (talk) 10:30, 25 April 2012 (UTC)
File tagging File:Efe aydan.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Efe aydan.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Efe aydan.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Takabeg (talk) 10:37, 25 April 2012 (UTC)
File:Necipokaner.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Takabeg (talk) 13:52, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
File:Umur of aydin.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Constantine ✍ 18:32, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey
[edit]Hello! The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes.
You can find more information about this survey on the project page and see how your feedback helps the Wikimedia Foundation support editors like you. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement (in English). Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through the EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys to remove you from the list.
Thank you!
Reminder: Share your feedback in this Wikimedia survey
[edit]Every response for this survey can help the Wikimedia Foundation improve your experience on the Wikimedia projects. So far, we have heard from just 29% of Wikimedia contributors. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes to be completed. Take the survey now.
If you have already taken the survey, we are sorry you've received this reminder. We have design the survey to make it impossible to identify which users have taken the survey, so we have to send reminders to everyone. If you wish to opt-out of the next reminder or any other survey, send an email through EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys. You can also send any questions you have to this user email. Learn more about this survey on the project page. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this Wikimedia Foundation privacy statement. Thanks!
Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey
[edit]Hello! This is a final reminder that the Wikimedia Foundation survey will close on 23 April, 2018 (07:00 UTC). The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now.
If you already took the survey - thank you! We will not bother you again. We have designed the survey to make it impossible to identify which users have taken the survey, so we have to send reminders to everyone. To opt-out of future surveys, send an email through EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys. You can also send any questions you have to this user email. Learn more about this survey on the project page. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this Wikimedia Foundation privacy statement.
This media was probably deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Alparslanscan.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file (
[[:File:Alparslanscan.jpg]] ).
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Incnis Mrsi (talk) 10:23, 4 August 2018 (UTC)
- Who photographed the sculpture? Which license does the original photo have? When you scan a photo, you don’t create a new copyright at all. A photo like https://image.ibb.co/geREae/alparslann.png is a derivative work based on the booklet depicted, not Own work. And the original photo, in turn, is derived off the sculpture. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 11:20, 4 August 2018 (UTC)
I really don't have a clue, I have been owning this picture for quite some time and decided to scan it and customize it for Wikimedia Commons standards, if there is any copyright violation, we better delete it then, thank you for your information. KirmiziAdam (talk) 11:37, 4 August 2018 (UTC)
- Intellectual Property is tricky. You can physically own a DVD-ROM with some Microsoft or Adobe software, but it doesn’t entitle you to any rights on the software itself. Try to think in similar terms about photographs. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 12:50, 4 August 2018 (UTC)
File:Osman niyazi.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.
|
Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:58, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
- Hi. It's not page 404 but 378. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:09, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
I changed it to 378, thank you. KirmiziAdam (talk) 16:10, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
Merhaba
[edit]Karamanli86 adlı kullanıcı bu fotoğrafı kırpmış. Eski hali (sizin yüklediğiniz orijinal hali) sizce de daha iyi değil miydi? İsterseniz onu geri yükleyin. Bir de şunu rica edeceğim: Atatürk'ün bu adresteki fotoğrafını Commons'a yükleme şansınız var mı acaba? Kaynak telif ihlaline sebep olursa aynı fotoğraf uygun bir kaynakta bulunup buraya yüklenebilir. - Ullierlich (talk) 10:18, 12 January 2019 (UTC)
Community Insights Survey
[edit]Share your experience in this survey
Hi KirmiziAdam,
The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey about your experience with Wikimedia Commons and Wikimedia. The purpose of this survey is to learn how well the Foundation is supporting your work on wiki and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation.
Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.
This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).
Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.
Sincerely,
RMaung (WMF) 01:02, 10 September 2019 (UTC)
Reminder: Community Insights Survey
[edit]Share your experience in this survey
Hi KirmiziAdam,
A couple of weeks ago, we invited you to take the Community Insights Survey. It is the Wikimedia Foundation’s annual survey of our global communities. We want to learn how well we support your work on wiki. We are 10% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! Your voice matters to us.
Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.
This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).
Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.
Sincerely,
RMaung (WMF) 15:20, 20 September 2019 (UTC)
Reminder: Community Insights Survey
[edit]Share your experience in this survey
Hi KirmiziAdam,
There are only a few weeks left to take the Community Insights Survey! We are 30% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! With this poll, the Wikimedia Foundation gathers feedback on how well we support your work on wiki. It only takes 15-25 minutes to complete, and it has a direct impact on the support we provide.
Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.
This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).
Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.
Sincerely,
RMaung (WMF) 19:58, 3 October 2019 (UTC)
File tagging File:Sukru okan.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Sukru okan.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Sukru okan.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:52, 15 October 2019 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:Amiral okan sukru.jpg
[edit]This media may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Amiral okan sukru.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:53, 15 October 2019 (UTC)
File:TurkishPeople.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Aybeg (talk) 15:55, 25 November 2019 (UTC)
File:Suleyman p.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Túrelio (talk) 20:01, 31 January 2020 (UTC)
File:Süleyman Hüsni scan.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Túrelio (talk) 20:01, 31 January 2020 (UTC)
Autopatrol given
[edit]Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically marked as "reviewed". This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to make it easier for users that are monitoring Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, the Flickr upload feature and an increased number of batch-uploads in UploadWizard, uploading of freely licensed MP3 files, overwriting files uploaded by others and an increased limit for page renames per minute are now available to you. Thank you. ~riley (talk) 04:55, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
File:Seljuk artuk beg.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
HistoryofIran (talk) 05:56, 3 July 2021 (UTC)
File:Karay-refik-halit-1 m.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Nanahuatl (talk) 22:35, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
Yours sincerely, —RP88 (talk) 05:31, 18 August 2021 (UTC)
File:Hasan Rami Pasha.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Túrelio (talk) 07:42, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
Different person not Hasan Rami KirmiziAdam (talk) 12:58, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
File:Hasan rami pasha2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Túrelio (talk) 07:49, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
Different person not Hasan Rami KirmiziAdam (talk) 12:58, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
Hello, let you know : this file is under discussion in Russian Wikipedia. Reliable source of an image is not found for now. Where did you take a description of that image? It's using in few articles but can it be a fake personalization ? ~Fleur~ 07:24, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
File:Koca husrev.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Nanahuatl (talk) 02:08, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
File:Savior officers.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
MRTFR55 (talk) 09:28, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
File:Mehmed bey.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |