User talk:Ivanhercaz

Hola, tienes razón la situación es caótica, hay grandes discusiones al respecto lo que sí es cierto que , conforme a fuentes documentales, las descripciones del BOE o sus equivalentes autonómicos son lo más preciso, pero en la práctica, como se reconoce autononía a los entes locales la situación es caótica porque con frecuencia mantienen diseños tradicionales o incluso desde hace ya años los vienen sustituyendo arbitrariamente por logos que nada tienen que ver sin derogar los escudos heráldicos.

Resumiendo: Oficialmente el escudo tendría que tener azul intenso (azur) que destacaría sobre la bandera. El ayuntamiento usa el azul más o menos claro de su bandera que en heráldica se blasona (describe) como CELESTE, término que no aparece en la descripción...

Para evitarte perder el tiempo en discusiones, debes saber que en la Wikipedia se acordó que en caso de discusión prevalece lo que aparezca en BOE o boletín autonómico, algo que me parece lógico. Aunque en la vida real y, dada la autonomía municipal ten en cuenta eso, que usan un azul blasonado como celeste, la situación como te comenté es caótica, este caso es un ejemplo aunque los hay peores.

• Celeste heráldico, uso de facto municipal [1]

• Azur (azul oscuro), ajustado a la descripción del boletín en una web oficial canaria [2]

Un saludo--Heralder (talk) 17:21, 19 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Lo mejor es que uses los colores y líneas de aquí , el azul es más próximo al celeste pero continúa siendo oscuro, yo uso otro diseño. En la consola (adorno exterior) tendría el color amarillo sin brillo de la base de la corona sería también plano (deja una única capa de color y cambia el borde a color negro con menor grosor). La corona (y la consola) la tienes más ajustada tanto en colores como diseño aquí Un saludo de nuevo --Heralder (talk) 18:19, 19 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

català | English | español | euskara | galego | +/− Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Earth 2016! Dear Ivanhercaz, On behalf of the Wikipedia community and Wikimedia Spain, organizer of the Spanish edition of Wiki Loves Earth 2016, we want to say thank you for your participation, and especially for contributing your pictures to the free knowledge. Due to the participation of people like you, the contest has gathered thousands of pictures of natural heritage sites from 17 countries. The contest in other countries is still open. You can find all your uploaded pictures in this category, and you are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and hence help to develop Wikimedia Commons. Wiki Loves Monuments and Wiki Loves Folk are just around the corner. If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help. English speaking Commons community meets in the Village Pump. You are more than welcome to leave us a comment, suggestion or question. You can post them here. Kind regards, the Wiki Loves Earth team

Hola, he visto que has creado las categorías Castle of La Peroja y Bridge of the Bibei, los nombres de esas categorías son incorrectos porque en inglés esos nombres deben ser los oficiales y por lo tanto deben ser A Peroxa y O Bibei. Revisa los nombres que hayas creado en otras categorías de monumentos de la Comunidad de Galica y otras porque puede que sean incorrectos. Si necesitas ayuda puedes contactar conmigo. Saludos, --Elisardojm (talk) 09:34, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Voy a revisar las de Galicia y las que pueda arreglar ya las cambio, pero os quedan las de las demás comunidades. Además hay que tener cuidado porque puede que ya existan otras categorías para eses monumentos con el nombre en castellano o en el idioma de la comunidad, yo acabo de encontrar la categoría "Castelo de Castro Caldelas" y la he pasado a "Castle of Castro Caldelas" que hiciste tu, y que había quedado repetida. Saludos, --Elisardojm (talk) 09:59, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Bridge of the Bibey has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Elisardojm (talk) 10:18, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Castle of La Peroja has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Elisardojm (talk) 10:21, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Tower of Homenaje de Viana has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Elisardojm (talk) 10:22, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Church of San Julián de Astureses has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Elisardojm (talk) 10:30, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hola Iván, creo que deberíais retirar la es:Necrópolis de Arteara del listado, porque tiene fotos e incluso categoría. También habría que actualizar es:Anexo:Bienes de interés cultural de la provincia de Las Palmas para incluir alguna foto y el enlace correcto a la categoría (Category:Necrópolis de Arteara). Saludos --Discasto _talk 10:53, 2 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No me convencéis ;-) pero... en todo caso, incluye la categoría en el listado de es:Wikiproyecto:WLM/Bienes de interés cultural de la provincia de Las Palmas para que, al menos, si alguien sube alguna foto, quede bien categorizada. Un placer oír de ti también :-) --Discasto _talk 13:18, 2 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Para es:Monumento natural de Isla de Terreros e Isla Negra: File:Isla Negra - Almería.jpg. Un saludo --Discasto _talk 22:39, 2 September 2016 (UTC) PS: se puede usar también para es:Anexo:Lugares de importancia comunitaria del MAGRAMA (Fondos del levante almeriense)[reply]

Hola, tengo algunas "tareas" más. He conseguido una foto para ilustrar es:Isla de Terreros. Es esta: File:Isla de Terreros.jpg. Por otra parte, he estado trasteando con algunas categorías de BIC. Category:Castle of San Juan de los Terreros es la categoría del es:Castillo de San Juan de los Terreros. Habría que incluir la categoría en los dos listados pertinentes: es:Anexo:Bienes de interés cultural de la provincia de Almería y el equivalente de WLM de este año (sí, este BIC tenía ya foto). Por otra parte, he adecuado el nombre de la categoría de la es:Iglesia Matriz de Santa María de Guía, para que sea Category:Mother church of Santa María de Guía, así que toca cambiarlo en los anexos correspondientes. Un saludo --Discasto _talk 20:17, 4 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Gracias. También le he puesto coordenadas: 37.357009, -1.651831. Saludos --Discasto _talk 09:30, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hola, me paso por aquí para agradecerte sinceramente tu participación en el debate de mi desbloqueo, incluso si ha sido finalmente infructuoso. Tras más de dos años completamente alejado de la interacción con la Wikipedia en Español, me causa gran tristeza el nuevo fracaso de mi petición. Como ya he comentado en mis peticiones de desbloqueo de las últimas semanas, mi única intención es pasar página y seguir contribuyendo al conocimiento libre. Reconozco la frustración de seguir en el mismo punto en el que estábamos en 2012, cuando ya se arguyeron políticas inexistentes para negar un desbloqueo que, aparentemente, cuenta con un respaldo mayoritario por parte de todos aquellos que han querido pronunciarse sobre el tema.

También te lo agradezco porque, posiblemente, no has apoyado mi desbloqueo por tu simpatía o cercanía hacia mí, sino porque crees que ese precisamente no es un argumento relevante y sí el avance del proyecto. Precisamente porque soy consciente de todo lo ocurrido y de todas las cosas que hice mal es que te doy las gracias por querer darme una oportunidad para demostrar con hechos que lo lamento y que deseo reparar los perjuicios causados. No voy a tirar la toalla y seguiré intentando poder volver a reintegrarme en el proyecto, con los mismos deberes que todos los demás, pero también con los mismos derechos. Hasta que esto ocurra, seguiré con mi labor en Wikiexilio, aquí en Commons y en Wikidata.Gracias finalmente por haber dado la cara en un debate en el que lo más cómodo era simplemente quedarse al margen. Un afectuoso saludo --Discasto _talk 15:05, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

العربيَّة ∙ Deutsch ∙ español ∙ English ∙ français ∙ português ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（中国大陆）‎ ∙ 中文（台灣）‎ ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−

Hi Ivanhercaz, you're now a filemover. When moving files please respect the following advice:

• Use the CommonsDelinker link in the {{Rename}} template to order a bot to replace all ocurrences of the old title with the new one. Or, if there was no rename-request, please use the Move & Replace-tab.
• Please leave a redirect behind unless you have a valid reason not to do so. Other projects, including those using InstantCommons, might be using the file even though they don't show up in the global usage. Deleting the redirects would break their file references. Please see this section of the file rename guideline for more information.
• Please know and follow the file rename guidelines.

INeverCry 01:53, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Facade of Town hall of Almadrones Spain.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful : We must shoot all the municipalities and especially smaller. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:27, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Archaeodontosaurus! Regards, Ivanhercaz | Discusión 09:13, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I agree, but it should be possible to take pictures of buildings like this with much better lighting conditions. Charles (talk) 08:44, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Charles: yes, I imagine that there will be days with better lighting conditions but I haven't the possibility to take it because, for me, it is very difficult to go. What I only can do is increase the light in the photo, although I think it is fine at this moment. Regards, Ivanhercaz | Discusión 09:13, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:24, 7 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

First, Second, Thrid. Phantastic. This is how we wokr here together? I decline a request, because if names confuse, the file on the Wikipedia has to be changed, not the Commons file, because of here is the center for files, that get used by different projects. So the file names on the single projects must change. Then comes a person who undo my administrative descission - und you then do what this person wants. Phantastic! Great! So we can stop projects as Commons, because this can not work for longer. Marcus Cyron (talk) 12:47, 24 October 2016 (UTC) PS: maybe we have to talk about your right to move files.[reply]

Hi Ivanhercaz, I am a bored bot (this is kind of a computer program) that is watching the recent changes and tapping buttons like I did now.

Curious about the reason? Possibly not but I will tell you anyway:

1. You edited User:Ivanhercaz/toolbarPlus.js. Glad to see you coding in javascript! Have you ever considered becoming a MediaWiki hacker?
2. Though, that change appears to introduce 5 new jshint issues — the page's status is now having warnings. Note that invalid or ambiguous code often has unwanted side effects like breaking other tools for you. If you cannot find out how to fix it, I suggest blanking the page for now.
3. To help you understanding where the issues are, I have aggregated a report here and now. If you have questions, don't hesitate to ask users experienced in javascript writing for help. But do not ask the bot's operators (chronically overwrought) unless you suspect an error of mine. If you prefer not getting spammed by me, you can opt-out reports by adding {{ValidationOptOut|type=all}} to your user page or cmb-opt-out anywhere on your your global user page on Meta. Good luck at Wikimedia Commons and happy hacking!

Your CommonsMaintenanceBot (talk) at 22:07, 11 April 2017 (UTC).[reply]

Hi Ivanhercaz, I am a bored bot (this is kind of a computer program) that is watching the recent changes and tapping buttons like I did now.

Curious about the reason? Possibly not but I will tell you anyway:

1. You edited User:Ivanhercaz/toolbarPlus.js. Glad to see you coding in javascript! Have you ever considered becoming a MediaWiki hacker?
2. Though, that change appears to introduce 1 new esprima issue — the page's status is now having ERRORS. Note that invalid or ambiguous code often has unwanted side effects like breaking other tools for you. If you cannot find out how to fix it, I suggest blanking the page for now.
3. To help you understanding where the issues are, I have aggregated a report here and now. If you have questions, don't hesitate to ask users experienced in javascript writing for help. But do not ask the bot's operators (chronically overwrought) unless you suspect an error of mine. If you prefer not getting spammed by me, you can opt-out reports by adding {{ValidationOptOut|type=all}} to your user page or cmb-opt-out anywhere on your your global user page on Meta. Good luck at Wikimedia Commons and happy hacking!

Your CommonsMaintenanceBot (talk) at 22:08, 11 April 2017 (UTC).[reply]

Hello, As per policy it is not allowed to use files in the signature. Please remove the file from your signature. Thanks (Please reply here on your talkpage if you have any questions) --Steinsplitter (talk) 17:04, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

All right, Steinsplitter. I have removed it. Regards, Ivanhercaz (talk) 17:20, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Photographs by User:Ivanhercaz has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

  — Jeff G. ツ 04:57, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
View of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria from the dock of La Esfinge, Port of Las Palmas.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:30, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support Santamarcanda (talk) 16:49, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:56, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Portrait of a black tortoiseshell cat..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support, I think this portrait is very good to ilustrate carey cats. Santamarcanda (talk) 03:54, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
•  Comment Santamarcanda, please restore your signature if you'd like your vote to count. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:44, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Thank you Ikan Kekek, I was distracted. Santamarcanda (talk) 03:54, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:06, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Ivanhercaz, we are aware that using the old installation method of VFC (via common.js, which you are using) may not work reliably anymore and can break other scripts as well. A detailed explanation can be found here. Important: To prevent problems please remove the old VFC installation code from your common.js and instead enable the VFC gadget in your preferences. Thanks! --VFC devs (q) 16:24, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Ivanhercaz!

Vielleicht hast du es schon mitbekommen: Im Moment läuft – noch bis zum 30. September 2017 – der internationale Fotowettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments 2017. Wir freuen uns auf deine Fotos von Bau- und Kulturdenkmalen! Wie du mitmachen kannst erfährst du auf unserer Mitmach-Seite, bei Fragen und Problemen kannst du dich auf unserer Support-Seite melden.

(Martin Kraft im Namen des Organisationsteams von Wiki Loves Monuments Deutschland, 12:37, 19 September 2017 (UTC))[reply]

Welcome to the newsletter for Structured Data on Wikimedia Commons! You can update your subscription to the newsletter. Do inform others who you think will want to be involved in the project!

Community updates

• Rama published an article about Structured Commons in Arbido, a Swiss online magazine for archivists, librarians and documentalists: original in French, illustrated and the article translated in English.
• We now have a dedicated IRC channel: wikimedia-commons-sd ^webchat

Things to do / input and feedback requests

• Join the community focus group!
• Translation. Do you want to help out translating messages about Structured Data on Commons from English to your own language? Sign up on the translators page.
• The documentation and info pages about Structured Data on Commons have received a thorough update, in order to get them ready for all the upcoming work. Obsolete pages were archived. There are undoubtedly still a lot of omissions and bits that are unclear. You can help by editing boldly, and by leaving feedback and tips on the talk pages.
• We have started to list tools, gadgets and bots that might be affected by Structured Commons in order to prepare for a smooth transition to the new situation. You can help by adding alerts about/to specific tools and developers on the dedicated tools page. You can also create Phabricator tasks to help keep track of this. Volunteers and developers interested in helping out with this process are extremely welcome - please sign up!
• Help write the next Structured Commons newsletter.

Presentations / Press / Events

• Structured Data on Commons was presented at Wikimania 2017 in Montréal for a packed room. First design sketches for search functionality were discussed during a breakout session. Read the Etherpad reports of the presentation and the breakout session.
• Katherine Maher, Executive Director of the Wikimedia Foundation, answered questions on Quora. One of her answers, mentioning Structured Data on Commons, was republished on Huffington Post.
• Sandra Fauconnier, Amanda Bittaker and Ramsey Isler from the Structured Commons team will be at WikidataCon. Sandra presents Structured Commons there (with a focus on fruitful collaboration between the Wikidata and Commons communities). If you attend the conference, don't hesitate to say hi and have a chat with us! (phabricator task T176858)

Team updates

Two new people have been hired for the Structured Data on Commons team. We are now complete! :-)

• Ramsey Isler is the new Product Manager of the Multimedia team.
• Pamela Drouin was hired as User Interface Designer. She works at the Multimedia team as well, and her work will focus on the Structured Commons project.

Partners and allies

• We are still welcoming (more) staff from GLAMs (Galleries, Libraries, Archives and Museums) to become part of our long-term focus group (phabricator task T174134). You will be kept in the loop of the project, and receive regular small surveys and requests for feedback. Get in touch with Sandra if you're interested - your input in helping to shape this project is highly valued!

Research

Design research is ongoing.

• Jonathan Morgan and Niharika Ved have held interviews with various GLAM staff about their batch upload workflows and will finish and report on these in this quarter. (phabricator task T159495)
• At this moment, there is also an online survey for GLAM staff, Wikimedians in Residence, and GLAM volunteers who upload media collections to Wikimedia Commons. The results will be used to understand how we can improve this experience. (phabricator task T175188)
• Upcoming: interviews with Wikimedia volunteers who curate media on Commons (including tool developers), talking about activities and workflows. (phabricator task T175185)

Development

In Autumn 2017, the Structured Commons development team works on the following major tasks (see also the quarterly goals for the team):

• Getting Multi-Content Revisions sufficiently ready, so that the Multimedia and Search Platform teams can start using it to test and prototype things.
• Determine metrics and metrics baseline for Commons (phabricator task T174519).
• The multimedia team at WMF is gaining expertise in Wikibase, and unblocking further development for Structured Commons, by completing the MediaInfo extension for Wikibase.

Stay up to date!

• Follow the Structured Data on Commons project on Phabricator: https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/project/profile/34/
• Subscribe to this newsletter to receive it on a talk page of your own choice.
• Join the next IRC office hour and ask questions to the team! It takes place on Tuesday 21 November, 18.00 UTC.

Warmly, your community liaison, SandraF (WMF) (talk)

Message sent by MediaWiki message delivery - 14:26, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ivanhercaz, what streets and buildings are included and what is excluded? Note that there are modern buildings within the old town and that there is no clearly visible border between the old town and the rest of Santa Cruz de La Palma. This category urgently requires a clear definition. Otherwise it will degenerate to a hotchpotch of everything that in Santa Cruz de La Palma looks old in the eyes of some users. Greetings, -- Ies (talk) 15:14, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ies!

Excuse me for not reply to you until now. At this moment, I can't define the streets and buildings included and excluded in the old town of Santa Cruz de La Palma. I am going to search official resources that allow me to define the limits of this old town. I made a fast-research and I found the BIC declaration (in Spanish, if you are interested, I can translate the fragment about it), but it doesn't define what is included; it talks about what has historical and artistic value. I am not sure with that.

I am agree with you, if we don't define this category it could converted in a hotpotch of everything in S. C. de La Palma. I will try to fix it. I created this category as part of Wiki Loves Monuments, to review the photographs and have the lists prepared for the contest. Excuse me for not define it fine.

When I have something to tell you, I will send you another message!

Regards, Ivanhercaz (talk) 14:21, 8 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Gracias por la sugerencia. Ya están subsanados los errores en este y los otros 4 planos que subí. Dichos errores fueron producto de mi apresurado e incorrecto uso del asistente automático de subidas.

La fuente es un cuadernillo de uso escolar editado por emalsa y la ULPGC referido al aula ambiental de Fuente Morales: Fuente Morales y el abastecimiento de agua a la ciudad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria. Aula Ambiental Fuente Morales. Ayto de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria; ULPGC; Emalsa. eduambiental.org.

Un saludo. Beta15 (talk) 23:22, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

¡Exquisitos planos, Beta15! Sin problema por los errores, para que es esto colaborativo sino para ayudarnos en todo lo que podamos. Muy interesante ese cuadernillo que comentas, no he tenido el placer de verlo. Gracias por hacerme saber que existe. A ver si un día puedo encontrarlo.

Por cierto, aprovecho que tenemos este «enlace» ―quiero decir que hemos tenido oportunidad de hablar a partir de esto― para preguntarte si estás interesado en que te notifique sobre actividades que se realicen en Canarias relacionadas con el Movimiento Wikimedia ―editatones, charlas, talleres, etcétera―. En su momento te compartí el anuncio de una editatón que organizamos desde Wikimedia España en el Castillo de Mata. Uno de los objetivos que tenemos es intentar agrupar a todos aquellos interesados en este movimiento. Y, de esa forma, estar en contacto, ya sean miembros o no de Wikimedia España; el punto de unión es nuestro objetivo e interés.

Espero tu respuesta. Si te puedo ayudar algún día en algo, me lo comentas y lo miramos.

Saludos, Ivanhercaz (talk) 02:10, 15 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

En primer lugar decirte que en la pagina web de medioambiente del Ayto. de LPGC (eduambiental.org) puedes acceder a material imprimible para educación. Este concretamente aparece bajo el epígrafe Fuente Morales. Yo lo tengo físicamente y escaneé los planos (5 en total) porque igualmente me parecieron una referencia magnífica para muchos artículos relacionados con la historia de la ciudad y que por supuesto te invito a que uses, modifiques, o añadas información como te parezca oportuno, con la seguridad de que lo harás con buen criterio.

Con respecto a la información no dudes en comunicarte conmigo, aunque por desgracia no suelo contar con mucho tiempo libre por mis obligaciones familiares. En cualquier caso para alguna colaboración puntual podría encontrar un hueco. Un saludo y encantado de que hayamos contactado. Beta15 (talk) 19:37, 15 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

¡Genial! Muchas gracias por la información, Beta15. Totalmente de acuerdo contigo, son planos bastante útiles que nos pueden ayudar a mejorar muchos artículos.

Te entiendo. Lo primero es lo primero, y ese puesto debe ser siempre para la familia. Yo hasta hace unos días he estado bastante desconectado por eso mismo. Entonces, te tendré en cuenta. He visto que tienes activada la opción de enviarte un correo electrónico, por lo que cuando tenga alguna actividad que comunicarte te lo notificaré en la discusión y te enviaré un correo electrónico. Por si acaso esos días no pasas por los wikiproyectos.

Igualmente, encantado de que hayamos establecido contacto.

Saludos, Ivanhercaz (talk) 00:02, 16 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to the newsletter for Structured Data on Wikimedia Commons! You can update your subscription to the newsletter. Do inform others who you think will want to be involved in the project!

Community updates

• There was a IRC Office Hour about Structured Commons on November 21. You can read the log here.
• Our dedicated IRC channel: wikimedia-commons-sd ^webchat

Things to do / input and feedback requests

• NEW: Participate in a survey that helps us prioritize which tools are important for the Wikimedia Commons and Wikidata communities. The survey runs until December 22. Here's some background.
• NEW: Help the team decide on better names for 'captions' and 'descriptions'. You can provide input until January 3, 2018.
• NEW: Help collect interesting Commons files, to prepare for the data modelling challenges ahead! Continuous input is welcome.
• Join the community focus group!
• Do you want to translate messages and information about Structured Data on Commons from English to your own language? Sign up on the translators page.

Presentations / Press / Events

• Sandra presented the plans for Structured Commons during WikidataCon in Berlin, on October 29. The presentation focused on collaboration between the Wikidata and Commons communities. You can see the full video here.

Partners and allies

• We are still welcoming (more) staff from GLAMs (Galleries, Libraries, Archives and Museums) to become part of our long-term focus group (phabricator task T174134). You will be kept in the loop of the project, and receive regular small surveys and requests for feedback. Get in touch with Sandra if you're interested - your input in helping to shape this project is highly valued!

Research

• Research findings from interviews and surveys of GLAM project participants are being published to the research page. Check back over the next few weeks as additional details (notes, quotes, charts, blog posts, and slide decks) will be added to or linked from that page.

Development

• The Structured Commons team has written and submitted a report about the first nine months of work on the project to its funders, the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation. The 53-page report, published on November 1, is available on Wikimedia Commons.
• The team has started working on designs for changes to the upload wizard (T182019).
• We started preliminary work to prototype changes for file info pages.
• Work on the MediaInfo extension is ongoing (T176012).
• The team is continuing its work on baseline metrics on Commons, in order to be able to measure the effectiveness of structured data on Commons. (T174519)
• Upcoming: in the first half of 2018, the first prototypes and design sketches for file pages, the UploadWizard, and for search will be published for discussion and feedback!

Stay up to date!

• Follow the Structured Data on Commons project on Phabricator: https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/project/profile/34/
• Subscribe to this newsletter to receive it on a talk page of your own choice.
• Join the next IRC office hour and ask questions to the team! It takes place on Tuesday, February 13, 18.00 UTC in wikimedia-office ^webchat.

Warmly, your community liaison, SandraF (WMF) (talk)

Message sent by MediaWiki message delivery - 16:32, 13 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

català | English | español | euskara | galego | +/− Dear Ivanhercaz, As every year, Wiki Loves Earth in Spain, an international photographic contest about natural heritage sites in the Spanish territory, started on May 1st. On behalf of the Wikipedia community and Wikimedia España (WM-ES), and as a participant in former editions of the event, we'd like to encourage you to participate in the 2018 edition. We do know that you've been keen on contributing your work to the free knowledge in the past and therefore believe that you'll be glad to help us again to document biodiversity. If you have comments, questions or suggestions about the contest, they are more than welcome. You can leave them here. You can review the rules of the contest in it official site (Spanish). We look forward to your free images! We take also the opportunity to invite you to Wiki Loves 2017 awards ceremony, which will take place on June 16th at 17:00 in the Medialab-Prado auditorium, in Madrid. Open entry until filled to capacity. Sincerely, The team of the Wiki Loves Earth edition in Spain

--Rubén Ojeda (WMES) (talk) 09:24, 23 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Ivanhercaz, You endorsed the Wiki Loves Love photo contest on Meta. This photo contest starts on 1 February. To be able to make the photo contest more accessible and available to more people in the world, it needs translations of the upload wizard, templates and pages to your local language. Please help us! Go to Commons:Wiki Loves Love 2019/Translations to see how needs to be translated. (In some languages there are maybe already some translations available.) Thanks in advance!! For the international Wiki Loves Love organising team - Romaine (talk) 17:41, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

¡Hola! Desde Wikimedia España, nos complace anunciar que la edición de Wiki Loves Earth 2019 acaba de empezar. Tu participación nos ayudará a documentar espacios naturales protegidos y compartirlos con el mundo a través de Wikipedia y otros proyectos de conocimiento libre. Además, este año organizamos el concurso de fotografía en colaboración con Wikimedia Portugal, por lo tanto también puedes subir imágenes del país vecino.

Accede a la página del concurso para leer las bases: https://www.wikilovesearth.es/. Allí también podrás descubrir detalles sobre cómo participar y cuáles son los premios de esta edición. Si tienes cualquier duda, no dudes en contactar con nuestro coordinador de programas: Rubén Ojeda (WMES).

¡Muchas gracias y suerte! El equipo organizador de WLE 2019 en España

"Recibes este mensaje porque participaste en el concurso en ediciones anteriores" --19:44, 23 May 2019 (UTC)

We must put in the caption the geocoding. For architectural images it is recommended to correct the percpetive errors. Like this Town hall of Almadrones.jpg. Welcome to VI where you seem to have a bright future.--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:25, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Archaeodontosaurus! Thanks for your comments. I have put a {{Location}} template in each photograph of the respective categories of the three nominations I did, but I didn't add it in the caption. Should be added in this structured field?

I have many doubts about the perspective errors of the architectural images. I am reading about and trying to fix it. In the case of three photographs I nominated, whats exactly the error? I would like to see it clearly to learn to identify and solve it. What I tried with the Town hall of Almadrones.jpg was to keep all the horizontal lines straight and a central focus for the image. I am going to tell what I think of each image and I will wait your feedback to confirm that I have to correct this:

• Bell tower of the church of San Miguel Arcángel, Argecilla.jpg. I should rotate this one to the left side to keep the vertical lines straight.
• View of Argecilla with the town hall and the church 02.jpg. Should I crop it to keep only the town hall?
• Hermitage of La Soledad 01.jpg. In this case I have more doubts but may be it should be rotated a bit to the right to keep the horizontal lines straight.

I await your answers! Again, thank you!

Regards, Ivanhercaz (talk) 09:30, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Perfect for geocoding. The vertical lines should be at most near the vertical. For the counter-dive one can accept a symmetrical angulation; the others follow without any need for correction. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 13:11, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Archaeodontosaurus: Nice! So after your comments I think the first and second file, the bell tower and the town respectively, should be straighten a bit. Before to upload new versions to Commons I would like to be sure that I understand you and I fix it fine. This link is the bell tower and this one is the town hall (public links will expire in 7 days). Could you confirm these are the changes you said me? As you said "the others follow without any need for correction" I understand just the bell tower needs a perspective correction, but just in case you refer to the town hall too I did a small correction in its perspective.

I await your answers!

Regards, Ivanhercaz (talk) 15:56, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, On my Commons user page you have the possibility to send me an Email. Send me your address I quickly made the corrections in small formats I can send them to you so that you are an idea. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:39, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

did you receive my message yesterday? --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:23, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Archaeodontosaurus: Yes! Excuse me for the delay replying you, but yesterday I was busy and today I have been with migraine, so until now I couldn't reply nor work in nothing. Regards, Ivanhercaz (talk) 19:34, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Archaeodontosaurus: Fixed both images, the bell tower and the town hall. I await your comments. Regards, Ivanhercaz (talk) 20:27, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Manuel Ramírez Sánchez.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment I just want to note this photograph is cropped of this one. Is this a problem to nominate it? I would like to have it clear for another possible proposals I have in mind. Regards, Ivanhercaz (talk) 10:28, 26 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
•  Oppose Not with this scope. Manuel Ramírez Sánchez would be OK. Yann (talk) 04:50, 27 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

---

Scope changed from Manuel Ramírez Sánchez in the 1st Conference of University Institutes of Humanities in the Canary Islands to Manuel Ramírez Sánchez --Ivanhercaz (talk) 14:56, 27 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Please notify previous voters of this change. Remember: "A support vote that was made before a change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn".

---

•  Comment As I told to Yann in his user talk (check this thread), I renominate it by error because I supposed it was closed but not it was just an oppose vote. So erroneously I change the information of this page and created an archive of previous reviews of this nomination. I have tried to fix this nomination but I don't know if it sufficient or not, and what I should do with the archive page. Excuse me the inconvenience with this issue. Regards, Ivanhercaz (talk) 15:07, 27 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support Good now. Yann (talk) 15:55, 27 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:09, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Hermitage of La Soledad, front - Argecilla.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  CommentGood but, we must add a geocoding. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:19, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Thanks for your comment Archaeodontosaurus! I add a geocoding in each photograph of the respective category of the three photographs I nominated, including this one. Now each one has its own infobox and their respective Wikidata items. Regards, Ivanhercaz (talk) 09:16, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:17, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:14, 5 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bell tower of the Church of San Miguel Arcángel, Argecilla.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 08:51, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:14, 5 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Street sign of the Estrada da Torre.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:14, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Ivanhercaz (talk) 17:09, 5 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Town hall of Argecilla.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:08, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:18, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Hymenocallis littoralis (beach spider lily) flower in Santa Cruz de Tenerife.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment The binomial is always italic (international), followed by the vernacular name in English (Rule VI). but for botany there are several possible scopes: habitus, flower, inflorescences, leaves ... ic it is necessary to reduce to flowers. I corrected--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:30, 5 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Oh, yes, this is true. I have to get used to the scopes again. The next time, probably today, I will read better COM:VIS. Thank you for your comments remembering this important issue and your support. Regards, Ivanhercaz (talk) 09:38, 5 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:30, 5 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Ivanhercaz (talk) 18:50, 8 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Echinopsis lageniformis (Bolivian torch cactus) flower in Santa Cruz de Tenerife.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:24, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
•  Oppose Be careful, read the recommendations of the previous appointment. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:33, 5 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• @Archaeodontosaurus: Solved the scope issue mentioned in your previous appointment. Thank you! Regards, Ivanhercaz (talk) 09:42, 5 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

•  Support Perfect now --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:23, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Ivanhercaz (talk) 18:50, 8 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bust of João da Silva Nobre in Faro, by Sidónio José de Almeida.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment - Lighting is unfortunate. I'm not sure this fulfills the criterion of representing the scope well. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:23, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Yes, I also have doubts with the lighting. But as I think this is the best one of the scope, I decided to know your opinion nominating it as VI. Thank you for your feedback Ikan Kekek! Regards, Ivanhercaz (talk) 18:27, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• I'm not sure, either. I guess it's useful for now, but the real question is whether it's good enough to merit the VI designation. It would be much better if another photo were taken of this subject. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:57, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• @Ikan Kekek: I am totally agree with you that would be better if another photograph was taken. I will be totally agree with the final decision, promoted or not. Of course, it would be finally promoted due it is the best in the scope at this moment, but in the future I see a better one in the category or out of Commons with a compatible license, I would open a MVR to choose the better. Regards, Ivanhercaz (talk) 21:27, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

•  Support Ok with new version --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:56, 9 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support - Much better! -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:41, 9 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:13, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Ivanhercaz,

bald ist es soweit: Vom 1. bis zum 30. September 2019 findet zum neunten Mal der internationale Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments statt. Dabei können Bau- und Kulturdenkmale fotografiert und die Fotos hochgeladen werden. Du hast an einem der vergangenen Fotowettbewerbe teilgenommen. Deshalb laden wir dich ein, dieses Jahr wieder mitzumachen. Wir freuen uns auf deine Fotos!

Es sind viele spannende Motive überall in Deutschland zu fotografieren. Neben beeindruckenden märchenhaften Schlössern, Burgen und Kirchen können auch andere Kulturdenkmale wie Brücken, Industrieruinen, Bauernhöfe oder Parks fotografiert werden, um sie unter anderem in der Wikipedia zu dokumentieren. In den letzten Jahren sind zahlreiche neue Denkmallisten entstanden, die sich über Fotos freuen. Für die Suche nach Motiven gibt es bei Wikipedia zahlreiche Listen und Karten. Als Einstieg hilft diese Übersichtsseite. Weitere Informationen erhältst du auf der Mitmach-Seite.

Du bist interessiert, am Wettbewerb mitzuwirken, dir fehlt aber die richtige Technik? Dann wirf doch mal einen Blick in den Technikpool und das Technikleihportal von Wikimedia Deutschland! Dort findest du Kameras, Objektive und Zubehör verschiedenster Art. Sollte noch Technik fehlen, die aber in Zukunft unbedingt benötigt wird, dann freut sich Wikimedia Deutschland über dein Feedback zum Technikpool.

Außerdem laden wir Dich ein, ab Mitte September 2019 an der Vorjury teilzunehmen. Diese bewertet die hochgeladenen Bilder und ermittelt so gemeinsam mit der Jury, die im Oktober tagt, die Sieger von Wiki Loves Monuments 2019 in Deutschland. Das Vorjurytool ist hier bald freigeschaltet. Du benötigst dafür nur deinen Benutzernamen und das Passwort.

Für Fragen steht das Organisationsteam gerne auf der Support-Seite zur Verfügung.

Viel Spaß und Erfolg bei größten Fotowettbewerb wünscht dir im Namen des Organisationsteams --Z thomas 14:28, 28 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A community discussion has been closed where the consensus was to grant all file movers the suppressredirect user right. This will allow file movers to not leave behind a redirect when moving files and instead automatically have the original file name deleted. Policy never requires you to suppress the redirect, suppression of redirects is entirely optional.

Possible acceptable uses of this ability:

• To move recently uploaded files with an obvious error in the file name where that error would not be a reasonable redirect. For example: moving "Sheep in a tree.jpg" to "Squirrel in a tree.jpg" when the image does in fact depict a squirrel.
• To perform file name swaps.
• When the original file name contains vandalism. (File renaming criterion #5)

Please note, this ability should be used only in certain circumstances and only if you are absolutely sure that it is not going to break the display of the file on any project. Redirects should never be suppressed if the file is in use on any project. When in doubt, leave a redirect. If you forget to suppress the redirect in case of file name vandalism or you are not fully certain if the original file name is actually vandalism, leave a redirect and tag the redirect for speedy deletion per G2.

The malicious or reckless breaking of file links via the suppressredirect user right is considered an abuse of the file mover right and is grounds for immediate revocation of that right. This message serves as both a notice that you have this right and as an official warning. Questions regarding this right should be directed to administrators. --Majora (talk) 21:35, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

Google Code-In, Google-organized contest in which the Wikimedia Foundation participates, starts in a few weeks. This contest is about taking high school students into the world of opensource. I'm sending you this message because you recently edited a documentation page at Wikimedia Commons.

I would like to ask you to take part in Google Code-In as a mentor. That would mean to prepare at least one task (it can be documentation related, or something else - the other categories are Code, Design, Quality Assurance and Outreach) for the participants, and help the student to complete it. Please sign up at the contest page and send us your Google account address to google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org, so we can invite you in!

From my own experience, Google Code-In can be fun, you can make several new friends, attract new people to your wiki and make them part of your community.

If you have any questions, please let us know at google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org.

Thank you!

--User:Martin Urbanec (talk) 22:05, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

[[File:Boniface Ferrer et ses enfants, détail du retable de la crucifixion et des sacrements.jpeg]]

Hi Ivanhercaz

Boniface Ferrier, in French, Bonifaci Ferrer in catalan, Bonifacio Ferrer in spanish. It's the same for his brother Vincent Ferrier

How to solve it ?

Regards--Thcollet (talk) 04:57, 24 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Thcollet: Hi! I don't know if there is something to solve, because it is possible that Bonifacio Ferrer is better known as Bonifacio Ferrier in French. Although it seems a bit strange. Before to decline the rename request I check the consistency of the names across the available pages on the different Wikipedias, and it seems is more common "Ferrer" than "Ferrier". I don't know the policy about names and titles in the French Wikipedia, but may it could be necessary to move the page to "Boniface Ferrer" instead of "Boniface Ferrier". But, as I said, I am not very involved in French Wikipedia so it is just an opinion. My advice would be to talk this issue on Le Bistro.

If I can help you with something more it would be a pleasure for me.

Regards, Ivanhercaz (talk) 14:58, 24 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

¡Hola! Nos alegra anunciar que Wiki Loves Earth 2020 en España ya ha comenzado. Tu participación nos ayudará a documentar la naturaleza de España y mostrarla al mundo a través de Wikipedia y otros proyectos. Por favor, consulta primero las bases del concurso en su página oficial. En ella también puedes conocer cómo participar. Si tienes alguna pregunta, sugerencia o comentario, por favor, no dudes en ponerte en contacto con nosotros.

Gracias,
el comité organizador de Wiki Loves Earth 2020 en España - 09:17, 20 July 2020 (UTC)
Estás recibiendo este mensaje porque ya participaste en el concurso en ediciones anteriores.

¡Hola! Desde Wikimedia España nos complace anunciar que la edición de Wiki Loves Earth 2022 ya ha comenzado. Tu participación nos ayudará a documentar espacios naturales protegidos y compartirlos con el mundo a través de Wikipedia y otros proyectos de conocimiento libre.

Accede a la página del concurso para leer las bases: https://www.wikilovesearth.es/. Allí también podrás descubrir detalles sobre cómo participar y cuáles son los premios de esta edición. Si tienes cualquier duda, no dudes en contactarnos.

¡Muchas gracias y suerte! El equipo organizador de WLE 2022 en España

"Recibes este mensaje porque participaste en el concurso en ediciones anteriores" --03:55, 19 May 2022 (UTC)

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Adam Roussy.png, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Adam Roussy.png]]). If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work. If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Spinixster (talk) 00:57, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the notice, Spinixster! I think I were in the file history of the file due to some graphic modification I did (maybe remove a watermark?), but I don't remember. Either way, thanks for your maintenance work!

Regards, Ivanhercaz (talk) 10:36, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]