User talk:Giancarlodessi

hallo Giancarlodessi,

welcome to commons! benvenuto a commons!

Looking at your contributions, you might be interested in Commons:WikiProject Tree of Life.

TeunSpaans 20:47, 31 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The inaugural newsletter of the Tree of Life project has been published. You are welcome to read the newsletter, comment on its contents, frequency and form, or unsubscribe by putting your name on my talk page.

Teun Spaans 21:45, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, please do not remove images from the category plow just to put them on the Plough gallery page. There is currently no concensus about how to categorise images and it would therefore be unwise to take such drastic measures. /Lokal_Profil 00:42, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I'm not sure if I have understood your message. I have mistaken? But I didn't understand because: I thought it was useful insert the pics in articles and move from Plough many pictures which aren't ploughs. So, in the future I won't do more these operations. I'm afraid, could you advise an administrator to correct my errors? Thanks --gian_d 19:58, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry I might have been unclear. Inserting images in galleries (articles) is very useful. Also removing images which aren't suitable is also good. What I objected to was that you removed the category from the image after you had put it into the gallery. Some people like galleries and some like categories it is therefore best to leave one if you add the other. /Lokal_Profil 00:26, 8 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well! I won't remove more the categories from images. Next time, in these days I restore the categories which I removed from many pics  :) --gian_d 16:59, 8 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Great work on sorting the Plough page btw. =)/Lokal_Profil 18:21, 8 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Idroponica_g4.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. GeorgHH 19:14, 13 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Idroponica_g5.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. GeorgHH 19:16, 13 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Aratro_g2.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. GeorgHH 10:26, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Aratro_g3.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. GeorgHH 10:30, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Olive_growing_system_g3.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Oxam Hartog 00:15, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

This message was just to tell you license tag was missing. After your correction, all is alright. Friendly Oxam Hartog 22:19, 11 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Estirpatore_g5.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. GeorgHH 11:59, 9 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Estirpatore_g3.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. GeorgHH 11:59, 9 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Estirpatore_4.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. GeorgHH 12:00, 9 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ciao, Giancarlo Dessi, senti mi trovo sotto minaccia di cancellazione di un'immagine che ho caricato su Commons. Si tratta di un'immagine scattata da un amico che mi ha autorizzato a servirmene su wikipedia. Ma in che termini dev'esser redatta una lettera di autorizzazione ? Perchè, da quel che sto leggendo e da quel che mi ha scritto l'autore della foto ("puoi pubblicarla, citando comunque l'autore.....", più o meno questo è il succo) mi pare che non sarebbe "canonicamente" accettata. Vedo che hai risolto un tuo caso, mi potresti dare, cortesemente, una traccia ? Ciao, scusa. --Emmeauerre due 18:50, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

gian_d 07:21, 1 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

gian_d 07:22, 1 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ciao, ho visto le due foto, non è che si capisca molto: di sicuro Is Caravius è li da qualche parte, ma proprio dove non si vede bene. Nella prima mi sembra che non si veda, ci sono altre colline in mezzo. Nella seconda si intuisce ma ci sono le nuvole che coprono (a sinistra del Lattias parte un crinale continuo che unisce Is Caravius, Sa Cruxitta e Sa Mirra, per cui non è detto che la porzione di montagna che si vede nella foto sia proprio Is Caravius). Io ho 2 immagini di Is Caravius: in una si vede il crinale che dicevo ripreso da Sa Mirra, non è il massimo, nell'altra si vede solo Is Caravius dal Lattias, questa è buona ma in mezzo c'è un pilastro di roccia gigantesco (che è il vero soggetto della foto:-) --Vtummu 06:55, 21 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ripensandoci la prima foto non era poi così male: l'ho caricata, dalle un'occhiata potrebbe andare bene per la voce. Nel frattempo io ho già messo la foto di Genna Strinta, e ho caricato un'immagine di Sa Mirra. Ciao.--Vtummu 10:03, 21 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Gian - your photos Image:Juniperus oxycedrus g1.jpg, Image:Juniperus oxycedrus g2.jpg, Image:Juniperus oxycedrus g3.jpg, Image:Juniperus oxycedrus g4.jpg show Juniperus macrocarpa Sibth. & Sm. (Ginepro coccolone [1]; syn. J. oxycedrus subsp. macrocarpa), not typical Juniperus oxycedrus. Note the broad (2-3mm) leaves and large cones. It might be best to re-upload them with the name amended. Thanks! - MPF 11:25, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Mr Dessi -

Coul you tell me whether the following statement corresponds to your expectations for a publication in my next book, or if it lacks an element declaration:

« Photo by Giancarlo Dessì, Eucalyptus globulus g1.jpg. Source http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:Eucalyptus_globulus_g1.jpg. Reproduced under license CC-by-sa 2.5 - http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.5/. »

I thank you in advance, Ariane

Yes, it is correct. Thanks for your interest! --gian_d (talk) 00:48, 18 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

bdd25c3a03860160418fa6896f050ef7

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

• 
  your SVG work
• 
  Your pic, Improve by myself using Gimp
• 
  My work.
• 
  My SVG work
• 
  Im interested to improve this scheme.

Hello Giancarlodessi,

I seen your gallery of upload and I found that you work is mainly : uploading descriptive macro of insects (top view), natural macro photography, drawing some SVG schemes, making some scaning.
That's frankly really close of what I do : uploading descriptive macro of insects (top view), natural macro photography, drawing some SVG schemes, making some scaning restoring the whites on photographies.
I slowly improve my skills and, some times, write down tutorials, create tools, or some recommendations. Respectively, I created the tutorial Commons:Macro, the tools Image:Macro A4.svg and Image:Macro scales.svg, and the encourage the use of a naming conventions for insect image. I'm interested to both share this and get some feedback, some ideas from your own experience. So, feel free to contact me, share your interesting discovery, project ideas, or any other tips you can get on this several issues. Yug (talk) 21:49, 26 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Yug

I didn't understood well your purposes. I'm intersted mainly to write articles about our life project in italian Wikipedia and I think that pictures and diagrams are very important for give help to users. But I'm a bad photographer. I enjoy painting with Gimp and Inkscape so, when I cannot take a photo I try to draw an image to improve contents of my articles. I'm very busy in it.wiki project because I'm a writer and sysop, so I can offer very small time in Commons. If I can help for something I try to do my part but it's too hard in that moment. Greetings --gian_d (talk) 00:14, 27 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, noticed. So no worry, what I need the most is comments, ideas and requests, not full/active support. Since you work almost in the same way than me, you may have good ideas to how improve my work, and which tutorials may be helpful to write.

By example, for macro photography, I'm not really skilled either, but I use a smart white and scaled background when I shoot my picture (I put my insect on a printed version of Image:Macro A4.svg), that allow me to make more encyclopedic picture : with scale. So I notice you this, maybe you will be able to test it one day and give me helpful comments/feedback. Then, I will improve my tools and that will help all other users interested to work in the same way.

On Image editing, you may be interesting to get tutorials about gimp and color improvement : let me know what "you" need, I will [try to] provide the requested tutorials... which will help every one.

On SVG of Insects, I will learn from your SVGs ;), and maybe also write a tutorial encouraging to use some colors, etc.

In sum: I need to know what you think commons' users such you need to improve their skills and images. I perfectly understand that you may be really busy on wikipedia, that's our life !

Regards, Yug (talk) 10:04, 27 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ magyar ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−

Hello Giancarlodessi!

Thank you for providing images to Wikimedia Commons. Please keep in mind that images uploaded to Commons should be useful to all users of Wikimedia projects. This is possible only if the images can be found by other people.

To allow others to find the images you uploaded here, the images should be in some place that can be found by navigating the category structure. This means that you should put the images into appropriate topic pages, categories, optionally galleries, or both of them (see Commons:Categories). To find good categories for your images, the CommonSense tool may help.

You can find a convenient overview of your uploaded files in this gallery.

The important point is that the images should be placed in the general structure somewhere. There are a large number of completely unsorted images on Commons right now. If you would like to help to place some of those images where they can be found, please do!

Thank you. BotMultichillT (talk) 05:52, 3 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Image:Arthropod head problem 01.png is uncategorized since 2 December 2008. BotMultichillT (talk) 05:52, 3 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Image:Proclama di Vittorio Emanuele ai marinai d'Italia (25 settembre 1943).jpg is uncategorized since 19 December 2008. BotMultichillT (talk) 05:53, 20 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Image:Lysimeter g1.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
• Image:Eucalyptus globulus g1.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.

Grazie for your interest: You mean something like this? If yes, you can get the uploadable version here (http://chumpiru.net63.net//images/Housefly_anatomy-key.svg). Thanks, Al2

Hello Gian - thanks for the note; I'll accept your identification, though to me the leaves look too broad for J. oxycedrus. One small comment: the standard English name for J. oxycedrus is Prickly Juniper (not Cade Juniper). - MPF (talk) 10:12, 14 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ho cancellato Keroplatus testaceus. Se ti dovesse ricapitare, puoi usare {{speedy|wrong redirect}}. Grazie, ciao--Trixt (talk) 21:52, 17 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Can you please tell us more about why this picture should be deleted? Jastrow (Λέγετε) 15:56, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ciao Giancarlo Your drawings of wing venation are exceptionally useful.I have a particular interest here.Sphaeroceridae (which are of economic and foresic interest as you know) are hard to identify in keys but easy to place in species groups on wing venation. Can I send you some scans sometime? I would really appreciate your help. Unfortunatly the figures I have (from Seguy Faune de France are still copyright. All the best from Ireland Robert aka Notafly (talk) 10:06, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ciao Giancarlo I have a lot of Diptera literature as pdf and can send CDs of many important works. E-mail your address and I will post them.My e-mail address is on the Ulster Museum website.See my user page or google Robert Nash Ulster Museum. No time to write more now but we must begin a collaboration.Greetings to Italy. I will be in Rome for August Bella citta!Robert Notafly (talk) 08:11, 2 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Gteertings to you to. Robert

There should be a space between Wiki and atb which means "all the best" or best wishes Robert aka Notafly (talk) 09:27, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

--Lmbuga ^{gl, pt, es: contacta comigo} 11:24, 3 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Language policy#Titles of articles: Redirect : an article that provides a redirect from one language to the main article...Anyone can create redirects from their own language to the main article page--Lmbuga ^{gl, pt, es: contacta comigo} 11:38, 3 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Español: Si no es mucho pedir, antes de acusar a alguien de hacer algo, le agradecería a usted que lo comprobase. Yo no he categorizado esa redirección. Compruébelo en el historial y verá que la categorización la ha hecho User:ArthurBot. Gracias.

--Lmbuga ^{gl, pt, es: contacta comigo} 17:51, 3 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 06:20, 10 January 2010 (UTC)

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 06:21, 10 January 2010 (UTC)

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 06:21, 10 January 2010 (UTC)

 Done, grazie--Trixt (talk) 19:52, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I tagged this file as invalid SVG because it fails to pass SVG validator. Would you please fix that? The reason seems to be some sodipodi stuff in the SVG source and/or SVG version 1.0 despite 1.1. Saving the image as "plain SVG" and using SVG version 1.1 in inkscape should fix the problem. Thanks --Georg-Johann (talk) 13:29, 12 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, already fixed it... --Georg-Johann (talk) 17:41, 12 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Giancarlo,

My name is Rita Neves. I work in Câmara Municipal de Lisboa, that is a Public Organism in Portugal.

Actually, we are working on a road book of Biodiversity of Lisbon, for which we are going to produce a panel and a brochure. We found your photos on Wikimedia Commons and liked specially one of them very much, so we would like to know if you could allow us to use your photos, for free, to publish on this project, knowing that the brochure of will be for free distribution to everyone.

The photo we would like to use are the following:

Quercus Ilex http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Quercus_ilex_g1.jpg

The brochure will have four brackets. - Broochura a pocket to take the route - A brochure to present the day of inauguration

- Schedules for species identification
- Panels that will be fixed in the Land

As i said the Free Access will be everything :)

If you are the author and provide us that photo, we will refer your name in the bibliografy and we need to know what´s the name you want on the bibliography?

If it´s possible please respond to rita.neves@cm-lisboa.pt Thank you very much. Our best regards

Rita Neves

Hello Giancarlo,

My name is Rita Neves. I work in Câmara Municipal de Lisboa, that is a Public Organism in Portugal.

Actually, we are working on a road book of Biodiversity of Lisbon, for which we are going to produce a panel and a brochure. We found your photos on Wikimedia Commons and liked specially one of them very much, so we would like to know if you could allow us to use your photos, for free, to publish on this project, knowing that the brochure of will be for free distribution to everyone.

The photo we would like to use are the following:

Quercus Ilex http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Quercus_ilex_g1.jpg Ceratonia siliqua http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Arcosu07.jpg

The brochure will have four brackets. - Broochura a pocket to take the route - A brochure to present the day of inauguration

- Schedules for species identification - Panels that will be fixed in the Land As i said the Free Access will be everything :)

If you are the author and provide us that photo, we will refer your name in the bibliografy and we need to know what´s the name you want on the bibliography?

If it´s possible please respond to rita.neves@cm-lisboa.pt Thank you very much. Our best regards

Rita Neves

Hello Giancarlo,

I see you message.

How do I forward I get vacation has already sent this information to colleagues in service

Thank you very much.

Our best regards.

Hallo! I've got confused on looking through the pointers of your image File:Tipulidae wing veins-1.svg. I've access to some identification keys on dipterans and found there the following phrase about tipulids: "Four branches of R have junctions with the edge of the wing in most species. In a few species only three R veins join with the edge since R₂ is reduced." That's strange because on your image R₂ doesn't join with C but only with R₁ and R₃. There's also mentioned that four medial veins exist. Seems to me there's a mistake somewhere in naming of veins. Have you any ideas on that? Mithril (talk) 00:17, 11 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Giancarlo I am Siga writing about insects in greek and german Wikipedia. I just want to use your shemes of mouthparts. They are really good, so I will redo them with same colours for homologue parts. I also varificated them with Gillott Entomology Third Edition Springer ISBN-10 1-4020-3182-3 They match perfect but in two cases. Thysanoptera and Siphonaptera.

In Syphonaptera according to Gillott (page 234) labial and maxillary palps are present, which I am missing in pic 1.

Most probably someone forgot the palps in "your" drawing. By the way, in Grzimek's Animal Life Encyclopedia Vol. 3 Thomson Gale ISBN 0-7876-5779-4 is said, that "there is only one channel for food and saliva" (p. 281). which is not really, but a "certain" contradiction to the descripton of your pic, where you noted two channels. I think, thats more or less a question of interpretation. Now to the fleas. Again the basic informations do fit: lacinia and epipharynx built the food channel. But Gillot goes on: the piercing organ rests in a grooved prementum. He does not mention maxillary or labial palp nor maxille (other part than lacinia) as shown in pic 2.

For short I had the idea, that you just mixed up the two pictures. I hope you are so interested in the materia, that you will find the time to look after. I would be glad to hear from you. Most friendly --78.43.51.201 16:21, 25 February 2011 (UTC) --Siga (talk) 16:22, 25 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thanks for your answer. I uploaded allready the derivates of your six pictures of the flies, butterflies and Hemiptera (as well as a correction of the wrong picture File:Evolution insect mouthparts coloured.png ), the derivates of flees, thripses and Anoplura are ready, but will rest on my PC untill the open questions are solved - no problem for me to wait. I suppose, you made the big part of the italian lemma of mouthparts, which is widly the best of all wikipedia articles (till now :) ) about that subject. It's really great, sincere congratulations. As for me, I am mainly interested in evolution of insects, I wrote the article of insect wings in German Wikipedia de:Flügel (Insekt) also under that point of view. I suppose that many articles (not only in Wikipedia) overlook the fact, that the biting mouthparts of today are also result of evolution and n o t starting point for the different types of sucking mouthparts. Notafly told me, that he will send me some material about insects, perhaps there will be some more information than the information, I posess till now. So, good luck in your new "my home, my castle". Siga --Siga (talk) 19:27, 27 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, just if you are interested to have an impression de:Mundwerkzeuge --Siga (talk) 12:03, 6 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Giancarlodessi,

• Cells: br: 1^th basal; bm: 2^th basal;

should it be first and second?

• Cells: br: 1st basal; bm: 2nd basal;

--Diwas (talk) 15:37, 4 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings Giancarlo.Will you be very kind and write a very short summary of this page in Italian please [2] (It may be easier from the French page). Haliday was one of the founders of the Italian Entomological Society and lived mostly in Italy.Best regards Robert aka Notafly (talk) 14:36, 7 April 2011 (UTC) Many thanks. Talk to you soonNotafly (talk) 15:12, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Did you see this? [3] Best regards Notafly (talk) 07:05, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings Giancarlo I understand your problems but please reconsider.Many hundreds, perhaps thousands, of entomology students rely on Wiki for free accurate information. Your work is very valuable and should be available to them.I will write more soon but the library is closing. Very warm regards Robert aka Notafly (talk) 15:32, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Fatto. Ti ringrazio per il tuo contributo al progetto. Ciao--Trixt (talk) 12:35, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Searching for higher quality version of the image I found that there's no such figure in the source you referred to. Two tables in the end of that paper were made in completely different manner. Could you please remember the real source? Mithril (talk) 07:39, 20 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Oleificio impianto continuo g1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

217.57.51.106 13:49, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Oleificio control g2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

217.57.51.106 13:49, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gramolatrice g2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

217.57.51.106 13:50, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Centrifuga orizzontale g1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

217.57.51.106 13:51, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Centrifuga orizzontale g3.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

217.57.51.106 13:51, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Oleificio control g2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

217.57.51.106 13:52, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gramolatrice g2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

217.57.51.106 13:53, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]