User talk:Culex

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Culex!
File:Sofia de Angulo de Reyes (1895).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jahoe (talk) 08:44, 24 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Laurent Mucchielli - Histoire de l'homicide en Europe.GIF has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

194.199.4.201 10:15, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Laurent Mucchielli - La découverte du social.GIF has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

194.199.4.201 10:16, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Laurent Mucchielli - La violence des jeunes en question.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

194.199.4.201 10:16, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Culex, you need to provide a permission from the photographer Pascal Ferro to OTRS. --Túrelio (talk) 14:02, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Túrelio. Pascal Ferro is a friend of mine. He sent me his photographs with approval for Commons as he doesn't know how to use Wikipedia. I must say I do not know myself how to send a prmission to ORTS. I thought that specifying in the source field (in French, though, but still), that I received the photo from the author with his agreement was enough. Culex (talk) 14:13, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Culex, it's rather simple. As you likely prefer French, just look at Commons:OTRS/fr. There you find the process explained, a permission template and the email adress of OTRS. Just should "prepare" the permission for him, then send it to him and ask him to date and sign it and to send it to OTRS. You need only 1 permission for all his photos. --Túrelio (talk) 14:20, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, thanks a lot, I'll immediately do that. Culex (talk) 14:26, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Autopatrol given

[edit]

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically marked as "reviewed". This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to make it easier for users that are monitoring Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, the Flickr upload feature and an increased number of batch-uploads in UploadWizard, uploading of freely licensed MP3 files, overwriting files uploaded by others and an increased limit for page renames per minute are now available to you. Thank you.

(et merci pour la catégorisation des fichiers des Archives Nationales :-)

Jean-Fred (talk) 13:21, 21 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, merci, c'est gentil. :) Je ne suis pas près d'avoir fini, en tout cas. Culex (talk) 13:52, 21 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  català  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  English  español  eesti  français  galego  magyar  italiano  Nederlands  polski  română  svenska  ไทย  українська  +/−

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2013! Please help with this survey.

Dear Culex,
Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2013, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time.

Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 365,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 50 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet).

If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2013.

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team
Wiki Loves Monuments logo



العربية | català | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | español | eesti | français | magyar | Nederlands | polski | svenska | ไทย | +/−

Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey!

Dear Culex,

Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey. Your answers will help us improve the organization of future photo contests!

In case you haven't filled in the questionnaire yet, you can still do so during the next 7 days.

And by the way: the winning pictures of this year's international contest have been announced. Enjoy!

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team
Wiki Loves Monuments logo

Picture of the Year 2013 R1 Announcement

[edit]

Picture of the Year 2013 R2 Announcement

[edit]

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open!

[edit]
2012 Picture of the Year: A pair of European Bee-eaters in Ariège, France.

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category have continued to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on 7 March 2014. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Commons:Picture_of_the_Year/2013/Introduction/en Click here to learn more and vote »]

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

This Picture of the Year vote notification was delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:21, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

RE: Photo pour livre

[edit]

Bonsoir,
Aucun problème pour la réutilisation du cliché ; merci d'avoir demandé. Il faudra que je verse de nouveaux clichés, à l'occasion, cela fait un moment que je n'ai pas pris le temps de le faire. A bientôt. --LeZibou (talk) 19:41, 8 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


La photo File:La-llagonne-vue-aerienne.jpg c'est pas mienne. L'auteur original est l'utilisateur fr:User:Saschabur de fr.wikipedia qui la a importé avec la légende « La Llagonne, vue aérienne. (Sascha mai 2005) » . Je comprends donc que son nom est Sascha. La photo est libérée au domaine public et vous pouvez la réutiliser sans problèmes. Pardon pour mon français. --SMP (talk page) 22:15, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Categorization

[edit]

Hi Culex, please use {{Copyvio}} to mark copyright violations, they will be automatically included in the appropriate category and you can give a reason why the image should be deleted. Regards Hekerui (talk) 13:16, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Picture of the Year 2013 Results Announcement

[edit]

Picture of the Year 2013 Results

[edit]
The 2013 Picture of the Year. View all results »

Dear Culex,

The 2013 Picture of the Year competition has ended and we are pleased to announce the results: We shattered participation records this year — more people voted in Picture of the Year 2013 than ever before. In both rounds, 4070 different people voted for their favorite images. Additionally, there were more image candidates (featured pictures) in the contest than ever before (962 images total).

  • In the first round, 2852 people voted for all 962 files
  • In the second round, 2919 people voted for the 50 finalists (the top 30 overall and top 2 in each category)

We congratulate the winners of the contest and thank them for creating these beautiful images and sharing them as freely licensed content:

  1. 157 people voted for the winner, an image of a lightbulb with the tungsten filament smoking and burning.
  2. In second place, 155 people voted for an image of "Sviati Hory" (Holy Mountains) National Park in Donetsk Oblast, Ukraine.
  3. In third place, 131 people voted for an image of a swallow flying and drinking.

Click here to view the top images »

We also sincerely thank to all 4070 voters for participating and we hope you will return for next year's contest in early 2015. We invite you to continue to participate in the Commons community by sharing your work.

Thanks,
the Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:59, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

saleilles

[edit]

Bonjour Fabricio Je te remercie pour tes photos de la chapelle de Saleilles. Si tu passes par Marcevol, tu pourrais peut-être reprendre une photo du mur du prieuré , adjacent à l'église , qui est appareillé en arête-de-poisson. Et aussi, mais certainement beaucoup plus difficile ! si jamais tu allais voir les ruines d'Ultrera, il y a également des vestiges de murs en arête-de-poisson. J'ai trouvé des photos d'églises et châteaux espagnols (notamment celui de Bufalaranya) mais je n'ai pas encore décidé comment nommer la catégorie dans laquelle je les mettrai, espina de pez ou herring-bone masonry in Spain ? en tous cas , merci de t'intéresser à ces choses cordialement--Pimprenel (talk) 18:27, 22 May 2014 (UTC)pimprenel[reply]

Category:2015 in ...

[edit]

Bonjour Culex, je vois que tu dépenses beaucoup de temps inutile sur les categories 2015 in... Les categories 2015 in... sont destinées à des événements en 2015, pas pour des fichiers individuels. Voyez p.e. recherche commons 2015 Aisne [1] avec plus de 2.500 fichiers. Mais si tu tiens vraiment à mettre le tout dans Category:2015 in Aisne, applique cat-a-lot, cela peut se faire dans 15 minutes pour les 2.500 fichiers. Mais puisqu'on trouve déjà les fichiers par un simple recherche commons, cela est superflue, et personne ne le fait. --Havang(nl) (talk) 11:46, 1 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Bien sûr, la recherche commons donne la date de prise de la photo, ce qui se voit parce-que la date est devant source. Pour les uploads en 2015, je trouve 2943 fichiers, 400 plus de fichiers que pour la date de la prise en 2015. Les utilisateurs, je les trouve par catscan 2. J'ai l'impression que tu pourras travailler plus efficacement, en utilisant davantage les outils de recherche. --Havang(nl) (talk) 12:52, 1 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Category discussion warning

Category:Acte_nacional_de_l'ANC_a_Ceret_2015 has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Achim (talk) 17:18, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Categorie Fédérale 2

[edit]

Bonjour Culex,

En naviguant hier soir dans les catégories, je suis tombé sur Category:Rugby union competitions of France, et constaté par hasards que la Fédérale 2 avait deux clubs sous-catégories (les clubs de Céret et Mazamet en l'occurence). J'ai donc retiré la catégorie Fédérale 2 de ces deux clubs :

  • parce que les clubs ne sont pas liés ad vitam eternam à cette division (Mazamet était en Fédérale 1 courant 2009 par exemple), contrairement entre autres à la Category:Super Rugby qui contient toutes les franchises, car ce n'est pas une compétition à promotion/relégation ; dans les autres sports à promotion/relégation (football, handball, rugby à XIII en France), les clubs ne sont pas liés aux divisions non plus.
  • comme dit plus haut, ce sont les seuls clubs dans ce cas, il est bien plus pertinent de les ranger dans Category:Rugby union teams of France (j'aurais dû le faire hier soir en même temps, je le fais de suite).

Si on combine ces deux arguments, cela impliquerait à chaque fin de saison de changer la catégorie des clubs relégués de Top 14/Pro D2/Féd 1/Féd 2... ? Lourde tâche, c'est pour ça que j'avais retiré cette catégorie. - Daxipedia - 達克斯百科 (d) 12:11, 4 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, merci bien pour les explications. Désolé pour le revert, dans ce cas. Culex (talk) 12:33, 4 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Pas de souci, ça aura été l'occasion de les rassembler avec les autres clubs. Clin - Daxipedia - 達克斯百科 (d) 16:13, 4 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Balance des couleurs pour photos de Canohès

[edit]

Bonjour, vos 3 photos de Canohès récemment importées (photo 1, photo 2 et photo 3) présentent une balance des couleurs tirant fortement sur le bleu. Est-ce un effet voulu de votre part ? Acceptez-vous que je fasse un correction ? Cordialement. Pmau (talk) 11:28, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour. Non, ce n'est pas voulu, mais plutôt le résultat d'un soleil écrasant ce jour là et d'une réaction étrange de mon appareil. Je les ai uploadé quand même car il n'y a pas d'autres photos pour ce bâtiment. Pas de problème si vous voulez les corriger (je ne suis pas très doué dans ce domaine). Merci. Culex (talk) 13:32, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, je viens de modifier les 3 images. C'est pas extraordinaire mais je pense que le rendu est mieux maintenant. Bonne fin de journée. Pmau (talk) 14:17, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, super, merci. Culex (talk) 16:25, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

2010 in Pyrénées-Orientales

[edit]

Bonjour Culex,
Je ne comprends pas cet usage des catégories comme Category:2010 in Pyrénées-Orientales pour des objets statiques et non des évènements.
La categorie Category:2010 in France précise la phrase suivante (je cite) : « This category includes works, events and everything related to the history of France in 2010. » Je ne vois pas ce que ces images ont à faire avec l'histoire de France en 2010...
Cordialement. Pmau (talk) 15:31, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Image du jour de Wiki Loves Monuments 2016 en France, 3 September 2016

[edit]
Wiki Loves Monuments 2014 Votre photo « Pont du Diable Céret - Vue depuis RG.jpg » a été choisie par les bénévoles de Wiki Loves Monuments 2016 comme image coup de cœur (ou image du jour) du 3 September 2016.

Cordialement, VIGNERON (talk) 10:49, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Super, merci ! Culex (talk) 11:01, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Gustave Violet

[edit]

Salut Culex,

Par quel diable veux-tu supprimer la photo de l’œuvre de Gustave Violet, qui est une statue publique ? Vatekor (talk) 10:17, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, 90.43.32.26 21:11, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ornézan - Affiches élection présidentielle 2017.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

acagastya  📷 21:26, 10 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Labéjan - Affiches élection présidentielle 2017.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

acagastya  📷 21:30, 10 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Céret - Affiches élection présidentielle 2017.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

acagastya  📷 21:35, 10 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Aubiet - Affiches élection présidentielle 2017.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

acagastya  📷 21:38, 10 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Romain-Grau-candidat-pour-En-Marche-Legislatives-2017-PO.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Arthur Crbz (talk) 13:40, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Romain-Grau-candidat-pour-En-Marche-Legislatives-2017-PO.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Titlutin (talk) 22:30, 12 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Photo for book

[edit]

No problem. Thanks for mentioning.--Paco 22:08, 17 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove deletion requests

[edit]

Bahasa Indonesia  বাংলা  Deutsch  English  español  français  magyar  Nederlands  Nederlands (informeel)‎  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  svenska  Türkçe  suomi  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  עברית  فارسی  +/−


Please do not remove deletion request tags from images before an administrator has closed the debate. If you do not agree that the image should be deleted, you can express your opinion on the deletion request page. You can find this page via a link in the deletion request tag or at Commons:Deletion requests. Thank you.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:40, 18 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Bourg-Saint-Andéol - Rue Jeanne-d'Arc (CP Vincenti).jpg

[edit]

Bonjour,

Pourquoi avoir annulé la précision apportée sur cette photo ? A. B., c'est le sigle d'Albert Bergeret, éditeur à Nancy.

Cordialement,

Jean-Jacques MILAN (talk) 18:16, 1 September 2018 (UTC), administrateur sur fr.wikibooks.[reply]

Sans doute, mais la description doit s'en tenir à ce qui est fourni par le document lui-même. Rien n'interdit par contre de créer une catégorie pour les cartes postales de cet éditeur et de l'y inclure. Cordialement, Culex (talk) 04:46, 3 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Palau-del-Vidre - Avenue Joliot-Curie et clocher.jpg

[edit]

Salut Fabricio, c'est la tour d'une maison privée, pas d'église. Cordialement --Palauenc05 (talk) 07:13, 14 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Bien vu ! J'ai en effet confondu. Je vais corriger ça, merci. Culex (talk) 10:36, 16 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:20150708 - Céret Affiches campagne.jpg

[edit]

Bonjour. Disposez vous des autorisations des auteurs des affiches figurant sur cette photo ? Merci par avance pour votre réponse. cordialement. - C'est moi (talk) 10:39, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour @Paul.schrepfer: Voir Category:Election posters in France. Ont été conservées toutes les images qui ne sont pas centrées sur une seule affiche, il me semble (sauf si domaine public). Culex (talk) 13:24, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Merci. - C'est moi (talk) 16:50, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Loves Monuments France 2019

[edit]

Bonjour,

Le concours Wiki Loves Monuments France est de retour et ouvert jusqu'à 31 septembre ! Déjà 8310 photos ont été importés cette année, vous aussi rejoignez le concours !

Le concours concerne tous les monuments présents dans la base Mérimée (qu'ils soient classés, inscrits ou simplement classés). De l'imposant château aux ruines industrielles, de la chapelle au coin de la rue aux mégalithes en forêt, c'est un impressionnant patrimoine qui attend d'être photographié et documenté. Où que vous soyez il y a des monuments autour de chez vous. Enfin, vous pouvez mettre en ligne autant de photos que vous le souhaitez de ces monuments. Pour information, le règlement est disponible sur le site du concours. Nous attendons vos photos avec impatience !

Les plus belles photos seront sélectionnées par un jury national composé d'amateurs et de professionnels, de contributeurs à Wikimedia Commons et d'acteurs du patrimoine. Un jury international sélectionnera ensuite des meilleures photographies mondiales.

Si vous avez des questions, l'équipe organisatrice se fera un plaisir d'y répondre.

P.S. : vous recevez ce message parce que vous avez participé au concours Wiki Loves Monuments en France les années précédentes. Si vous avez déjà ou si ne pouvez pas participer au concours cette année, faites passer le message autour de vous pour que de nouveaux et nouvelles photographes rejoignent l'aventure !

Bonne journée,

Sarah Krichen WMFr et Nicolas Vigneron, pour l'équipe de Wiki Loves Monuments France, 14:50, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:FILAF 2013 - Jennifer Flay.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Gelya.moreau (talk) 10:11, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour, sans vouloir chicaner, l'œuvre n'est pas encore dans le domaine public : l'auteur w:wa:Firmin Callaert étant mort en 1952, il aurait fallu attendre 2022 .
Ceci étant dit, je suis en train de mettre sur pied une version wallonophone de Wikisource et je serais très intéressé d'obtenir une copie numérique (PDF ou DJVU) de cet ouvrage.
Je suis même prêt à vous l'acheter si vous êtes prêt à vous en séparer.

N'hésitez pas à me recontacter par mail.

Bien cordialement, Reptilien.19831209BE1 (talk) 06:48, 14 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, zut, d'habitude je fais attention aux dates, je ne sais pas pourquoi cette fois-ci cela m'a échappé. Bon, ne s'agissant que de la couverture et non du texte, je ne pense pas que cela soit très grave. S'agissant du texte justement, j'avais l'intention de le numériser. Je peux vous l'envoyer dès que ce sera fait. J'ai ensuite l'intention de l'utiliser pour alimenter le Wiktionnaire en citations pour les termes wallons, et je préfère alors avoir l'exemplaire papier dans les mains, c'est quand même plus pratique (à mon avis), donc je vais garder l'original pour l'instant. Je l'avais acheté avec d'autres aux puces de Bruxelles lors de mon passage à la WikiConvention francophone cette année, il y en avait des centaines d'exemplaires identiques dont un brocanteur ne savait que faire, si jamais vous passez par là. Cordialement, Culex (talk) 15:11, 14 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2019! Please help with this survey.

[edit]

Wiki Loves Monuments logo
Wiki Loves Monuments logo

Dear Culex,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2019, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 210K+ pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 40 countries around the world.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2019.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team MediaWiki message delivery 12:33, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to participate in Wiki Loves Monuments 2019 Participant Survey (Reminder)

[edit]

Wiki Loves Monuments logo
Wiki Loves Monuments logo

Dear Culex,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2019, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 210K+ pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 40 countries around the world.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2019.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team MediaWiki message delivery 03:42, 23 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Joseph Modave

[edit]

Bonjour (bondjoû ?),

Avez-vous encore les œuvres de cet auteur, dont vous avez téléversé la couverture ? Je serais intéressé d'en avoir une copie numérique pour le projet Wikisource en wallon. Je suis également disposé à vous les racheter, si vous êtes prêt à vous en défaire. Cordialement :-) Reptilien.19831209BE1 (talk) 12:23, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2020! Please help with this survey

[edit]
Wiki Loves Monuments logo
Wiki Loves Monuments logo

Dear Culex,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2020, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again for a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 200K+ pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 50 countries around the world.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey.

Please fill in this short survey and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2020.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team, 08:21, 14 November 2020 (UTC)

Siège de Perpignan 1473 ?

[edit]

Salut,

Pourquoi avoir daté ce fichier à 1473-75 alors qu'il a été édité en 1542 et qu'aucune information ne semble attester d'une date autre que celle du siège de 1542.

Amicalement,

Arflhn (talk) 12:06, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour @Arflhn: . Dans mon souvenir j'avais eu un doute et un détail m'a fait pencher en faveur du siège de 1473 et non celui de 1542 : la présence des "italiens" sur la carte. De fait, les armées "françaises" étaient commandées par le duc de Savoie Philippe II, venu avec son contingent (on peut d'ailleurs voir un drapeau qui s'en rapproche). Ni les savoyards ni les italiens ne sont présents en 1542. Culex (talk) 13:12, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Statue du torero de Ceret

[edit]

La statue est une copie d'un dessin de Manolo Hugué, donc sans apport original et sur commande de la municipalité de Ceret. Vatekor (talk) 10:29, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

LR / Occitanie

[edit]

Tu pourrais au moins participer à la discussion sur les noms des catégories des régions avant de réverter comme un bourrin. Ça serait un peu plus constructif. --Birdie (talk) 13:54, 12 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour @Birdie:  ! J'ai jeté un oeil à vos contributions avant d'agir et n'ai pas remarqué de discussions à ce propos. J'ai donc annulé en justifiant (rien de bourrin donc). Je constate que vous avez vous-même annulé sans explication, c'est dommage et contraire à l'usage. Votre message ne m'éclaire pas beaucoup plus, c'est dommage également. Quoi qu'il en soit, les Pyrénées-Orientales font bien partie du Languedoc-Roussillon avant 2015. Cela justifie donc la présence de cette catégorie. Culex (talk) 14:18, 12 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Bonjour Culex. Tu auras pu remarquer que j'avais laissé les catégories de Midi-Pyrénées dans le même cas de figure. En effet, la catégorie existait déjà, j'ai donc juste rajouté l'Occitanie. Je ne vois pas l'intérêt de mettre des liens rouges. Soit le lien ne sert à rien, soit on le crée. Ajouter un lien rouge me semble une attitude très critiquable, du genre « je pense que ce serait bien de créer la page mais j'ai autre chose à faire, toi qui ne fait rien d'intéressant, bleuit donc ce lien ». Même si LR existait à l'époque, quel est l'intérêt de rajouter des catégories obsolètes ? En suivant le même raisonnement, il faudrait créer des catégories pour le Comté de Toulouse, le Comté de Roussillon ou la Vicomté de Carcassonne qui ont existé à d'autres époques. Tu pourras remarquer qu'en dehors de la France, on utilise toujours le nom actuel de la région, ainsi tu as Category:Baden-Württemberg in the 2nd century alors que le Land n'a été créé qu'en 1952 ou Category:Aosta Valley in the 11th century alors que la région ne date que de 1948. Il y a certes un anachronisme mais cela permet une simplification des catégories et d'éviter des erreurs qui verraient e.g. le Fenouillèdes compris dans des catégories du Roussillon. Sinon, la discussion sur les noms des régions portait, je crois, au début sur l'Île-de-France. --Birdie (talk) 16:19, 16 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Plus que quelques jours pour participer à Wiki Loves Monuments France !

[edit]

Bonjour,

Le concours Wiki Loves Monuments France est ouvert pour une semaine encore, jusqu'au 30 septembre. Déjà plus de 6 000 photos ont été importées cette année alors vous aussi rejoignez le concours ! Cette campagne de contribution concerne tous les monuments et objets mobiliers présents dans la base Mérimée et dans la base Palissy. De l'imposant château aux ruines industrielles, de la verrière décorative au reliquaire, c'est un impressionnant patrimoine qui attend d'être photographié et documenté. Vous pouvez dès à présent mettre en ligne autant de photos que vous le souhaitez de ces monuments et objets du patrimoine français. Nous attendons vos photos avec impatience !

Les plus belles photos seront sélectionnées par un jury national composé d'amateurs et de professionnels, de contributeurs à Wikimedia Commons et d'acteurs du patrimoine. Un jury international constituera ensuite une sélection des meilleures photographies mondiales.

Si vous avez des questions, l'équipe organisatrice se fera un plaisir d'y répondre.

P.S. : vous recevez ce message parce que vous avez participé au concours Wiki Loves Monuments en France

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:37, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Gers

[edit]

Bonjour Culex. Je viens sur ta pdd pour deux renseignements. Tout d'abord, en important récemment des photos de la commune de Sainte-Radegonde, j'ai remarqué deux fichiers (File:SAINTE RADEGONDE (2).jpg et File:SAINTE RADEGONDE (3).jpg) qui ne me semblent pas admissibles, mais je n'ai pas demandé la suppression car je ne suis pas sûr à 100%. D'autre part, j'ai fait le mois dernier la ronde des crèches autour de Miradoux, mais j'ai un doute sur la possibilité ou non d'importer des photos de crèches. Qu'en penses-tu ? Merci d'avance, F123 (talk) 11:24, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour @F123: et bonne année ! Pour les photos de Saintte-Radegonde, je ne sais pas ytop non plus. Je n'ai pas retrouvé ces photos ailleurs sur internet, donc dans le doute on peut les laisser je pense. Pour les crèches, à partir du moment où ce ne sont pas des oeuvres d'art signées et où ce sont tes photos, je ne vois pas de problème. Culex (talk) 11:54, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Bonne année 2022 au fait oui ! Très bien, je ferai comme tu dis. Et bravo pour la réponse rapide ! F123 (talk) 12:42, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Death year of R. Serres

[edit]

In Commons:Deletion requests/File:Millon stamp.jpg you said that "R. Serres was not dead since 70 years". This implies that you might know when they died. An "undelete in" category should be added to the request, and for that I assume the death year is needed. Can you add the category, or ping me with needed information (or any partial information you may have)? –LPfi (talk) 13:20, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Mémorial cathare

[edit]

Je suis quelque peu estomaqué que un an et demi après que j'ai publié les photos, vous les proposiez à la suppression parce que les images d’œuvres contemporaines ne sont pas libres droit. Cela ne revient-il pas à invibiliser un monument commémoratif, et, par conséquent chercher à occulter les événements qu'ils rappellent? Un monument commémoratif n'est-il pas là pour attirer l'attention sur certains événements, et conséquemment mériter de se faire connaître par tous canaux appropriés? Je ne connais pas la règle que vous invoquez, mais je suis sûr que les commanditaires de l’œuvre et l'artiste (ou les artistes) qui l'a réalisé ne devraient pas s'opposer à ce que wikipédia la fasse connaître. Je vous concède qu'il faudrait leur demander, ce que je n'ai pas fait, pensant naïvement que ce ne devrait pas poser de problème. Agloforto (talk) 17:03, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Agloforto: Je suis le premier à le déplorer mais la loi française est stricte et n'accorde pas de réelle liberté de panorama pour les oeuvres contemporaines (sculptures ou même bâtiments) présentes dans le paysage. Pour exemple, j'ai dû attendre 2015 pour pouvoir mettre une photo du monument aux morts de ma commune (pourtant construit en 1922) que son sculpteur tombe dans le domaine public (soit 70 ans révolus après sa mort). Il en est de même pour cette oeuvre. La seule solution est que ce soit le sculpteur lui-même qui la "libère" en uploadant lui-même des photos de son oeuvre. Par contre, je n'ai pas demandé la suppression des plaques avec les noms, qui peuvent ne pas être considérées comme une oeuvre. Culex (talk) 19:26, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
File:Céret 2014 - Panneau électoral.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 08:26, 23 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Enregistrement - langue faka'uvea

[edit]

Bonjour Cullex, Je voulais savoir si vous avez d'autres enregistrement de langue wallisienne d'Amaliki Puakavase? Merci Lea.fakauvea (talk) 20:36, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour @Lea.fakauvea: Il s'agit d'un stagiaire de 3e que j'ai eu dans ma bibliothèque (dans les Pyrénées-Orientales) il y a quelque temps et que j'ai décidé d'enregistrer à ce moment là en wallisien et futunien. Nous avons été surpris de voir qu'il était le premier alors à avoir enregistré dans ces deux langues (il en a été très fier). Je ne sais pas ce qu'il est devenu. Culex (talk) 12:38, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
merci Cullex et bonne continuation! Lea.fakauvea (talk) 16:35, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
File:Canton Vallespir Albères - Panneau candidats à Céret.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 02:50, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:20150708 - Céret Affiches campagne.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 03:43, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]