User talk:Anynobody~commonswiki

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Archive 1-2

Image queue is closed for upgrades of previous images.

Image of Flight 901

[edit]

An editor recently raised an objection to the use of two of your images in w:Air New Zealand Flight 901 on the basis of the images being Original Research (see that article's talk page). Apart from defending their use, having seen your other contributions, I decided to come here and leave a note of appreciation for the great work you've done. Excellent graphics, in a technical sense, and you should be commended for taking care to 'interpret reality' as authentically as possible - ultimately for the benefit of thousands of readers. Good stuff. Glen Dillon (talk) 12:36, 13 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for the heads up and your kind words :) It's always a pleasure to hear that my images are appreciated :) Anynobody (talk) 01:46, 14 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Unfortunately, the unnamed editor mentioned above is correct. These images are OR, and are not allowed to illustrate Wikipedia articles. Tempshill (talk) 21:24, 16 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Interesting, you refer to an unnamed editor arguing original research as being correct, yet that editor is you. Why not just say, "I am correct..."?
As Glen Dillon pointed out, w:WP:OR#Original images specifically addresses this issue. Images are exempt from OR unless they add something new not in the published sources. It says (emphasis added on the really important parts): Original images created by a Wikipedia editor are not, as a class, considered original research – as long as they do not illustrate or introduce unpublished ideas or arguments, the core reason behind the NOR policy.
The appearance of the plane came from photos of it, Ross Island/Erebus came from published maps with elevation data, and weather conditions (including cloud levels and types) came from the official report, the excerpt of which I included in the description of File:Dc10erebus.png. So that being said, what's original about it? Anynobody (talk) 05:18, 17 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. In case you havn't seen it, there has been some discussion about your images at Wikipedia:Village pump (policy). The responses are all positive in that they indicate no OR issues with your Air New Zealand DC-10 images. I may make (or suggest) a small change to the caption accompanying the image in the Flight 901 article, but that would be about it.Glen Dillon (talk) 00:00, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I've always assumed folks would edit the captions at some point, so I don't put too much thought into them. That being said, please go ahead with any changes you'd like to make :)
As for the discussion, I was unaware of it so thank you for the heads up. Anynobody (talk) 00:38, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Since I seem to be alone in my opposition (in the thread on the Policy page on VP on en), I'll stop nagging about these images, but must insist that every caption must begin with "Artist's depiction of..." I would oppose "CG render of...", for example, because some people will come to the conclusion that the image was generated by a data-based simulation of some kind. Thanks - Tempshill (talk) 21:16, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I appreciate your message, it's rare in disputes and especially so online. It's also important to understand though, like any text in any article; I've always assumed folks would edit the captions at some point, so I don't put too much thought into them. (Personally I favor "illustration" as a description because I try to minimize the use of artistic license and "artist's impression" tends to be code for "poorly researched picture of...") Anynobody (talk) 02:35, 29 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Category question

[edit]

Hi. I was going through categorizing files and came across your File:Min0.png. What is it and how can I categorize it? Thanks. Doulos Christos (talk) 16:07, 17 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello :) It was going to be part of some project I had planned around April of 07, which I aborted because incorporating lots of little images into text turned out to be a bad idea. If you want feel free to delete it. Anynobody (talk) 22:11, 17 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Tip: Categorizing images

[edit]

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ magyar ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−

Hello, Anynobody~commonswiki!
Tip: Add categories to your files
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 05:38, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Piper Alpha?

[edit]

Hi. I was wondering whether it would be possible to do a series of drawings based upon the events of the Piper Alpha disaster. Email me at one (dot) salient (dot) oversight (at) gmail (dot) com.

I'm sorry to say I must've tried two or three variants of the address you gave, so I'll just reply here.
What did you have in mind? Anynobody (talk) 02:38, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

[edit]

Thanks for identifying the plane in White Plane Blue Sky as Singapore Airlines. I figured if I posted it someone eventually would. I know it's a simple picture but I liked the joyousness of a white plane alone through a blue sky. Downtowngal21:41, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Not a problem, thanks for uploading it :) Anynobody (talk) 02:38, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image:BashTuDHL757.png

[edit]

Anybody,

it's about the picture linked above. Would you like to edit it due to some critic in the German wikipedia? There are two things: First, many users want the picture to be not that dark since in the thumb view you hardly can see anything. It know it has happend at night, but maybe you can make it look like it was in the tilight? Second, can you make the aircrafts be more descending? Both the aircrafts have been in an "increased descending".

Thanks in advance, looking forward to seeing the new version. Damn good job you're doing by the way. Cheers, Yellowcard (talk) 09:29, 4 February 2009 (UTC) (in the case you wanna answer me please do so here - thank you![reply]

Ooooooo

[edit]

How do you make those plane computer simulations?


File:Accelleratedstall.gif

[edit]
File:Accelleratedstall.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ��� svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Rainald62 (talk) 19:17, 14 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:727db.gif

[edit]

Thanks for your sterling efforts on File:727db.gif over the years - it's one of Wikipedia's most informative animations. I wonder, though - your latest (Blender-based) versions show the aircraft with its wheels down, whereas your previous versions show it wheels up. Is there reason to believe that the wheels were indeed down when Cooper jumped? -- Finlay McWalter (talk) 22:14, 18 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

First, thank you for the praise :) Second, indeed it's not a detail found in every source, but is out there as I discovered while looking around for anything I may have missed as I was doing this version: San Fransisco Chronicle "Cooper told Rataczak that after the money and parachutes had been delivered, he wanted the pilot to head south from Seattle, depressurize the cabin, fly no higher than 10,000 feet, leave the landing gear down, set flaps at 15 degrees and leave the rear door open. With the exception of the door, which had to be closed for takeoff, he got everything he asked for."
I'd actually prepared a gear up version when I happened upon the above article. I debated what to do and checked for other sources, upon finding a couple more I decided to go with gear down. [1] [2] On a side note, the detail also seems consistent with someone who has a better than average knowledge of aviation and skydiving, but not professional experience. (Landing gear won't keep a nearly empty 727 under 200 mph if the pilot pushes the throttle enough.) Anynobody (talk) 02:30, 19 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Lighten up Toba Eruption?

[edit]

Tobaeruption.png in the Toba catastrophe theory article is just too dark. The others which you've uploaded which are not linked are not as effective. I lightened it up with Windows explorer and it looks fine. Ok if I upload it? Unless you want to do another version. Thanks. Carolmooredc (talk) 23:53, 17 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'll see what I can do :) I should probably mention that the picture isn't depicting the initial pulse; The atmosphere is really hazy so simply increasing brightness will probably just make it look foggy. Anynobody (talk) 21:38, 20 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia DYK awards

[edit]

I saw that you created the DYK awards such as File:Dyk200.png. I was wondering if you could create a 250, 500, 750, and 1000 DYK award picture. Let me know if you will on my en wikipedia talk page. Thanks.Smallman12q (talk) 02:08, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Happy to help, I've actually been toying with 500 and 1000 medals but can probably do 250 and 750 also. Anynobody (talk) 02:49, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. There's no rush, but its nice to have.Smallman12q (talk) 14:39, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Here's a proposal for a 500 award: Anynobody (talk) 04:34, 8 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]


File tagging Image:Earbhnscity.png

[edit]
العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading Image:Earbhnscity.png. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Hello, your rendered images (not only the one mentioned above) probably use textures you didn't create by yourself. So you cannot relicense thems under the license of your choice, unless those textures are under a free licence or within Public Domain. If that's the case, please give the source of the images you used, or remove the works composing your renders that don't belong to you. Thank you. →Diti the penguin — 13:16, 5 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Actually I do make most of the textures you see in my images, whenever I use something downloaded from the web I've first made sure it's NOT copyrighted and I usually note it, like here: File:Dc10erebus.png.
(Unless you count randomly generated textures from Blender and any sample textures included with the software.)
What in this image do you think I'm "stealing"? Anynobody (talk) 22:54, 5 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
On this image, it is unclear if you used a texture for the Earth from some place on the internet, or if it comes (as you say so) from Blender. As a potential reuser, I wondered if I could safely use the image, and as a contributor, I sent you a notification (along with a message, it doesn't seem “human” otherwise…). My apologies if this message appeared harsh to you. :( →Diti the penguin — 23:41, 5 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The Earth, in this image, is actually made up of three textures. The land masses originally came from a sample texture included with AutoCAD 2002 which I used Inkscape to trace into a vector enhanced meta file (.EMF) so I could increase the size and detail it in Paint Shop Pro. Here are thumbnails of each:
I don't take your concern as harsh, I reposted on your page because sometimes people leave messages which I respond to but receive no further communication. (Figured they may have forgotten or assumed I wouldn't answer, so I started responding directly.) Anynobody (talk) 02:57, 6 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fuselage

[edit]

Hi,

In your image File:737-700f.gif, illustrating a fuselage, would it be possible to remove the coloring from the engines, and perhaps remove the red and orange stripes from the aft part? As far as I can tell, the file is only used (on en, anyway) to illustrate the "Fuselage" article, and the extra coloring is a little confusing.

Thanks - Tempshill (talk) 17:35, 10 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The livery is actually from a Southwest Airlines 737, circa 2000. I don't want to confuse anyone, so I re-did the highlight color. I don't wanna use livery from crashed 737s in my other pictures so I'll try to start on the Boeing 737-700 livery soon. Anynobody (talk) 02:01, 11 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Biz Jet - Swept Wings and Tail.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for finally identifying File:Biz Jet - Swept Wings and Tail.jpg it's been one of the ones that has eluded me for a while, out of interest what is it that helped you make the identification there being very little to go on but the planform.KTo288 (talk) 14:21, 14 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Double checking, it's not a Gulfstream. It's actually a Bombardier Global Express. I'd been looking at it for a while myself and had originally based the Gulfstream ID on the very low mounted wings with unexposed main landing gear but failed to notice the flap actuators which the Gulfstream V doesn't have and the lack of winglets which all Gulfstream Vs seem to have. I'm definite on this ID, compare it to these images; Anynobody (talk) 04:10, 15 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Low wings, three flap actuators on each wing + unexposed main gear
    Low wings, three flap actuators on each wing + unexposed main gear
  • No winglets
    No winglets
I think you're right about it being a Bombardier, though I was convinced that you had it write about it being a Gulfstream V, anyway congratulations on getting what I thought was a pretty impossible one to identify.KTo288 (talk) 14:27, 15 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you very much :) It was pretty difficult, but probably not nearly as difficult to id as whatever this is:File:Mr. Wizzard - Eclipse and plane (by-sa).jpg. It kinda suggests a new category, Unidentifiable aircraft. Anynobody (talk) 19:07, 16 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]


File source is not properly indicated: File:Acvbckd.png

[edit]
العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Acvbckd.png, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Acvbckd.png]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

High Contrast (talk) 19:03, 13 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion request of one of the image you upload

[edit]

Could you please comment on this. - Zil (d) 00:19, 18 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Done :) Thanks for the heads up, usually it's a good thing when someone uses images from here elsewhere. Anynobody (talk) 02:04, 19 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Use clip

[edit]

Hi! You placed a .gif file on the viscosity page (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Viscosity.gif) which I think shows the principle very well. I was wondering if I can use it in my school project, I don't like stealing stuff without asking. Elisabeth

You sure can, I appreciate your consideration :) Anynobody (talk) 00:44, 21 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thx.

[edit]

I just wanted to thank you for your excellent work so far. wbr, Alexpl (talk) 12:39, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You're most welcome, and thank you too :) Anynobody (talk) 01:35, 22 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Software?

[edit]

Would you mind sharing what you make you images with? I've admired them for years now and am curious. I work for the FAA -- wish I were in a position to recommend you for employment in recreating incidents, you'd be brilliant at it. 70.116.93.178 05:51, 30 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, thank you very much :) I actually use several programs to make my images, 99% of the models were made with AutoCAD versions 14 or 2002. Texture maps are made with either Paint Shop Pro, GIMP, Inkscape, or sometimes all. The models and textures are then imported into Blender to render the basic image which can be modified with the same programs I use to make/manipulate textures. Anynobody (talk) 00:56, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sequence of images into animation

[edit]

I have been looking with some interest at the images you've been creating for BloodRedSandman on en.wikinews. I would very much like to take these images and create an animation from them. For that, I would need to know the time elapsed between each image (or "frame").

Once there are four or more frames I can make a start on doing this. It may take some trial-and-error to get it right but, the presentation should be far more dramatic in that way. --Brian McNeil / talk 04:01, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, I'm planning on five images and have already done two so I can let you know those right now. The other three I can give a ballpark guesstimate.
  1. Frame 1 Time 4.5 seconds before explosion
  2. Frame 103 Time .53 seconds after
  3. Frame 150-156 Time ~3.0 seconds after
  4. Frame 400-420 Time 22-23 seconds after
  5. Frame 880-900 Time 44-45 seconds after
Anynobody (talk) 04:32, 18 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Categorization

[edit]

Hello!

What happened here? --High Contrast (talk) 22:27, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Umm, I'm not sure but I probably cut Fighter aircraft to use for some reason I'm forgetting and then hit enter instead of going back. Anynobody (talk) 04:05, 18 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

MOdels

[edit]

Hello, I was wondering if there was a link to download the model of the Sub-chaser and Gato submarine, I mod games and wanted to put it in SHIV.

Thanks

I'd be happy to help you out but for a couple of problems.
  • First and most important, the models now have way too many details for games to perform well (you're looking at the models as they were two or three years ago, I've added a lot of stuff). A game model should, ideally, have as few meshes as possible, to get better frame rates: I created meshes for each part of the ships including their weapons/rigging/etc.
  • Second, I'm pretty sure the commons doesn't accept model file formats.
Wish I could help :( Anynobody (talk) 21:56, 24 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Attribution

[edit]

Hello, I have used one of your pictures in my article here. I just wanted to check that the way I attributed the work you is OK with you as well as the licence. Every picture is clickable and in the larger detail, there are all the info visible, but inside the article, they are not. Is it necessary to provide link to be always visible (as it is now bellow the image)? No problem, just want to clarify it for the future. Keep up the great work and thanks. (please send reply to pavel dot kasik at idnes dot cz)

Toba eruption

[edit]

Hi! May I ask you something: Which sources did you use for your great File:Tobaeruption.png? I just started rewriting the article by the way!--Yannismarou (talk) 22:16, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, I used this info to get an idea of how much was erupted, what fell where, and how thick it was:
  • USGS Hawaiian Volcano Observatory
    • The scale of the Toba eruption is difficult to comprehend. Pyroclastic flows (hot flows of ash and pumice) covered an area of at least 20,000 square kilometers (7,700 sq mi), with deposits as thick as 600 m (2,000 ft) near the vents. Ash fall was widespread over much of southeast Asia. An ash layer approximately 15 cm (6 in) thick was deposited over the entire Indian subcontinent. Our appreciation of the magnitude of this eruption continues to grow as Toba ash is recognized farther and farther from the source.
  • Smithsonian's Global Volcanism Program
    • The YTT represents the world's largest known Quaternary eruption, ejecting about 2500-3000 cu km (dense rock equivalent) of ignimbrite and airfall ash from vents at the NW and SE ends of present-day Lake Toba.
The image depicts an eruption in its early stages, around day 1 - 2. Anynobody (talk) 02:06, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks a lot. I think it is good to mention this info in the picture. By the way, I was intrigued by the eruption watching a TV documentary, and that's how I decided to work on the Toba catastrophe theory article in Wikipedia! But I am no geologist! Therefore, if you happen to have a look at the article and find any inaccuracies in my wtitings, please intervene! Cheers!--Yannismarou (talk) 10:58, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hughes Airwest Flight 706

[edit]

First, thanks for all the great pictures. I came across the Hughes Airwest Flight 706 article and it had one of your pictures. The problem is, that apparently Hughes Airwest changed their livery to 'banana yellow' as a consequence of this accident. See the discussion.--Ospalh (talk) 13:30, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'm really sorry not to have gotten back to you sooner, thank you very much for the compliment. I've been dealing with an old arbcom ruling so have been away from the commons. I'll definitely get that fixed ASAP :) Anynobody (talk) 02:46, 22 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

United Airline Flight 811 engine gauges

[edit]

That is a very informative png of the engine gauges in the UAL 811 article. I am wondering if it would take a lot of your time to change the gauges from the linear tape type, to the round analogue type? I ask that because the round ones are the types that were installed on UAL planes. I don't know if it would be helpful, but you can see what those kind actually looked like, here. EditorASC (talk) 11:02, 27 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It's funny you should ask, I've been making flight decks for my 747 models as a side project, between a couple of super detailed images I've been working on. Next time I do anything on the 747 flight decks I'll concentrate on those first, meaning maybe a week or two. Anynobody (talk) 21:04, 27 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I was hoping you could correct it sooner than that. As it now stands, it is inaccurate and thus misleading (even though I am confident that was never your intention), and I think that might also raise allegations of [[3]]. I would much prefer that you correct it fairly soon, as I think it would be of great value to the article (as are many of your other creations), and a much preferable solution than outright removal of the existing image. Thanks much, EditorASC (talk) 23:49, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Using some of your illustrations in a magazine

[edit]

Hello. My name is Martin Trankell and I am a freelance journalist for a Swedish magazine called "Flygrevyn", and an occasional Wikipedian. We are thinking about doing a focus on the Jakarta Incident (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/British_Airways_Flight_9#cite_ref-Falling_from_the_Sky_1-0). The magazine is a aviation-related bimonthly magazine. Your illustration is very interesting - would you mind us using it for the article? You can reach me at trankelljournalist[at]gmail.com or m.trankell[at]gmail.com if you want to talk more privately. If we do, I'd love to give you full credit with a proper name and such. 109.124.128.41 14:15, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

USS Lexington

[edit]

Hello, I am doing a 3D scene of the battle of the coral sea, and I was wondering if I could use your USS Lexington CV-2 model and texture in it. All credits go to you of course.

Thanks

That model actually kind of sucked, otherwise I'd of done the image more like an offset side view to better illustrate the bomb hits. So when I got my new computer I decided to start over from scratch and didn't copy it. (I still have the model, on a hard drive in my disconnected computer.) If you want I'll let you know when I'm done, what format were you looking for? (dwg, dxf, blend, etc.) Anynobody (talk) 23:03, 10 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Images

[edit]
Yep, it's possibly the best 3d modeling and animation program I have access to that's less than eight years old. Since last year around this time I've used it for pretty much every image or animation, excluding SVGs. Anynobody (talk) 21:30, 13 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Answer to Life.svg

[edit]

This file seems to be corrupted in some way after you uploaded the new version. Is it just me? —Internoob (Talk · Cont. · Wikt) 00:28, 3 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Probably wasn't just you considering the file history thumbs are jacked up too. I'm guessing mediawiki didn't like blurred svgs. 00:00, 5 September 2010 (UTC)

Categories

[edit]

Thank you for the categories you added on my pictures of planes of Category:Ferté-Alais Air Show 2004. Lionel Allorge (talk) 11:46, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Not a problem, thanks for posting them :)

North Hollywood shootout Map

[edit]

I noticed you created a map of the area in which the North Hollywood shootout occurred. I live in the area, although I moved in after the incident. Although it's a minor point the map is somewhat incorrect. Morella actually goes through, it doesn't stop at Radford; Radford continues to the south as well. There's a house on the part of the street which the map shows not existing which does wonderful Christmas decorations. There's also a street, Hinds Ave., which is not on the map and which could, theoretically, have been important.

Although I'm not positive it looks like I would need to create an account and wait four days before I could update the map. I don't want to do that. Here's an edited file, and I'd appreciate it if you would update the original. The captioning in the article will need to be changed too, to include Hinds. I had to move the buildings a little to fit it in. I didn't think you were actually placing them based on real building positions and silhouettes. If you were I guess this is useless.

I've never been entirely confident with the map, mostly because the one I used was from 2005 or 2006. Do you happen to have access to what the layout was at the time of the robbery? Anynobody (talk) 03:48, 23 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Unfortunately no, I don't. I have a Thomas Guide from two years later, 1999, and it has the same street layout as today, except that it shows the two parts of Lemay St. in the area connecting. Having seen the buildings there (and noticed that according to Zillow the houses in the way were build int 1947 and 1953) I imagine that that's actually one of those deliberate errors which mapmakers sometimes use to check for copyright violations, but I can't be sure. Really though, there's not a lot of new construction in the immediate area, just a school which is slightly off the area the map covers. The streets were almost certainly the same. PleaseDeleteMe (talk) 23:39, 2 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Please do not overwrite files

[edit]

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ Nederlands (informeel)‎ ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ suomi ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ हिन्दी ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ עברית ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

I noticed that you uploaded a file using the name File:747 jal2.png. A file by this name already existed on Commons. Overwriting an existing file should not be done except when making minor, uncontroversial corrections, so the file has been restored to its previous version. If the file that you attempted to upload is within our project scope and is in the public domain or published under a free license, please upload it again under a different name. Thank you. For more information, please see Commons:Overwriting files.

This one was not restored to its original version but is should be so done. Please upload new version of images of the same subject under new names. A better image of an identical or similar subject isn!t a new version of the original file. --ŠJů (talk) 14:59, 9 December 2010 (UTC):[reply]

I think you've misunderstood the Commons:Avoid overwriting existing files proposal, it's actually about different versions and modifications of the same photograph. This isn't a photo it's an illustration, which is like a really fancy diagram. Diagrams can have errors not seen in a photograph, for example a misspelled word or bad layout. By your logic a whole new file with the correct spelling and layout should be uploaded, instead of overwriting the one in error. Anynobody (talk) 21:36, 9 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comment on File:Valu592-2.png

[edit]

First off, I love your images in articles - they really illustrate the articles well. So I do need to point out a discrepancy or ambiguity in File:Valu592-2.png, which describes itself as the last moments of ValuJet 592. It's not clear from the image, but it looks like the aircraft is about to impact at a fairly shallow angle, though again, it is difficult to tell as the horizon is not visible. For clarity, perhaps tweaking it to make it clear that the impact attitude was much more vertical will aid the reader understanding just how violent the impact really was ( reconstructed to be "Right wing down, nose down" (Ref: Sec. 1.1) and described by eyewitnesses as "nearly vertical" (op. cit., sec 1.1.1) ). Just thought I'd mention this, for accuracy sake. Thanks, and keep up the good work! Arakunem (talk) 18:12, 29 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I am so sorry for the late reply, the holidays have been busy as hell. Thanks for the compliments, I really appreciate the encouragement :) Making images based on real events is hard if you actually care about accuracy, so it's nice to hear from people who also look at the details.
I was kinda worried about that myself, whether the image really gives the impression of imminence regarding Critter 592's fate. Two things said yes, the large shadow and only extra swamp was cropped from the original image. The latter you had no way of knowing of course, but trust me, the plane is almost totally nose down and banked right. I tried to do it from a ground perspective but the problem was a stationary camera makes for a blurry airplane. I didn't do it without vector blurring because the image comes out looking like a Critter 592 is hovering. I could just upload the uncropped image, it helps make clear that the horizon is just as visible as it is anytime you're looking almost straight down. However that would have the unintended effect of making the airplane smaller and less easily seen in a thumbnail. Anynobody (talk) 05:27, 3 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Yes I can see what you mean. Thanks for the reply, and no worries on time, I'm just getting back on here as well. Arakunem (talk) 20:08, 4 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hughes Airwest Flight 706

[edit]

As I've been bringing the Hughes Airwest Flight 706 up to GA status on the English wikipedia, I've been fielding a lot of comments in various places about how great the two pictures (File:Hughesairwest705.png and File:Hughes air west N9345.gif) are. People have mentioned especially how the animated gif is an excellent aid for helping the reader to understand the circumstances of the collision. I figure I should come by here and drop off a note with my (and others') thanks for creating these awesome pictures. --Mûĸĸâĸûĸâĸû (blah?) 02:53, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for noticing :) Anynobody (talk) 18:01, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Anynobodyq.png

[edit]
File:Anynobodyq.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Teofilo (talk) 14:26, 30 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Xenuobey.svg

[edit]
File:Xenuobey.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Rob (talk) 17:06, 6 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Appears to satisfy both licensing and inclusion criteria, I made a comment at the discussion subpage. Hope you are doing well, Cheers, -- Cirt (talk) 20:36, 6 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello there Cirt, I'm doing fine how are you? As to the image, I really appreciate the heads up. However if it's deleted, it's deleted. Anynobody (talk) 01:18, 7 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Air New Zealand flight 901 on your userpage

[edit]

213.246.114.92 18:05, 10 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]
bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മല��ാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Af447diag.svg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Otourly (talk) 17:03, 13 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]
bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Airfrance447diag.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Otourly (talk) 17:05, 13 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:A310kenpre.png

[edit]
العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:A310kenpre.png, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Yann (talk) 19:30, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Silverplate

[edit]

Any idea where File:CGP-JPAP-112.jpg comes from? Hawkeye7 (talk) 00:21, 25 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lockedmyselfout.gif

[edit]
File:Lockedmyselfout.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Rd232 (talk) 09:52, 15 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Anypreview.png

[edit]
File:Anypreview.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Missvain (talk) 03:31, 17 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hawker Hunter Tower Bridge incident

[edit]

I was wondering if you would be interested in creating a computer generated image for use with the Hawker Hunter Tower Bridge incident? It really is a unique story, and one of your images would greatly benefit the article. Harrison49 (talk) 20:39, 19 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dohthnx.png

[edit]
File:Dohthnx.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Avron (talk) 18:40, 15 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Anynobodyillustration1.gif

[edit]
العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Anynobodyillustration1.gif, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Anynobodyillustration1.gif]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Funfood ␌ 23:24, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

1996 Charkhi Dadri mid-air collision

[edit]

I thought you could create a rendering of 1996 Charkhi Dadri mid-air collision(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1996_Charkhi_Dadri_mid-air_collision).Fauzan Zaid (talk) 18:05, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Iraqiranafgpak.png

[edit]
File:Iraqiranafgpak.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 21:54, 29 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Two versions of a picture that you uploaded here are also on Flickr too

[edit]

The dicussion is here: Commons:Village_pump/Copyright#Pictures_under_different_Lizenses_on_Wikimedia_Commons_und_Flickr. Regards --Uwe W. (talk) 16:52, 20 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep up the great work!

[edit]

Hello, I love your work, especially your beautiful 3D renderings of civil aviation disasters. Keep up the great work. Here are two barnstars for your hard work! Illegitimate Barrister (talk) 10:22, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Commons Ambassador Barnstar
Hello, I love your work, especially your beautiful 3D renderings of civil aviation disasters. Keep up the great work. Illegitimate Barrister (talk) 10:11, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The Original Barnstar
Hello, I love your work, especially your beautiful 3D renderings of civil aviation disasters. Keep up the great work. Illegitimate Barrister (talk) 10:11, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! It's always welcome to know the effort is appreciated! Anynobody (talk) 23:32, 10 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Great Work & a Request

[edit]

Hi,

I'd like to add to the praise of your work covering various aviation accidents and incidents. I'd also like to ask if you'd consider doing a render of Swissair Flight 306 covering the planes appearance after the fire became visible to outside observers?Graham1973 (talk) 03:29, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, and sure, I think I can do that. Can't guarantee it'll be right away though because I've gotta make a new model and textures for the Caravelle. (If it was a DC-9, 727, One-eleven, or Tu-154 I've already got models and template textures.) More importantly I've got some writing stuff I gotta do, for money, so naturally it takes priority. Don't give up on me though, someday, most likely this year, it will be done. Anynobody (talk) 02:04, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Just want to keep you updated, I've finished with the model and textures. Now working on the right angle/smoke and fire.
Anynobody (talk) 18:06, 30 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, looks very good, if you can find it Air Disaster:Volume 1 by MacArthur Job, has some interesting artists impressions of the accident as well.Graham1973 (talk) 03:02, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Viscosity2.gif

[edit]

català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ italiano ∙ lietuvių ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Thank you for providing images to Wikimedia Commons. Please keep in mind that images and other files on Commons must be under a free license and should be useful to the Wikimedia projects. To allow others to use your files, some additional information must be given on the description page. Most importantly:
  • Describe what it is about in a short sentence. (What does the image show?)
  • State the author and the date of creation. If you made it yourself, say so explicitly. If it is from another Wikimedia user, link to the person's local user page. Best to use CommonsHelper.
  • If you did not create the file yourself, state the source you got it from.
  • Add a copyright tag - images without an appropriate license tag will be deleted.
  • Add the image to one or more gallery pages and/or appropriate categories, so it can be found by others. To find out where an image belongs, you can use CommonsSense.

If you copied the file from another wiki, please copy all information given there and say who uploaded it to that wiki. Use CommonsHelper.

It is recommended to use Template:Information to put that information on the description page. Have a look at Template talk:Information for details of the use of this template.

You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file.

Please add as much information as possible. If there is not sufficient information, the file may have to be deleted. For more information, follow the Commons:First steps guide. If you need help or have questions, please ask at the Help desk.

Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, please read the text above again and follow the links in it,if you still need help ask at the ? ->Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 02:21, 22 December 2012 (UTC)

File:Arab League Israel.svg

[edit]
File:Arab League Israel.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Leoboudv (talk) 06:06, 28 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your CGI images of aircraft accidents

[edit]

Dear Anynobody, please note that I have just deleted several CGI images which you had created from articles an the English Wikipedia about air disaster. I did this because per [[4]] discussion, they are considered to violate current policies, especially WP:OR. I think these rendering are original research (which is not acceptable for inclusion), as well as an over-dramatization of the events. Best regards --FoxyOrange (talk) 20:29, 18 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Attributions

[edit]

Hi!

I love your renderings and am planning to your portrayal of JAL907 and JAL958 in my analysis of the near miss over Toyko. Can you contact me on sylvia@fearoflanding.com please? I want to make sure I get the attribution info correct!

Hello, and thanks! If you're just want to make sure attribution is correct then here you go; simply credit it to Anynobody and throw a link in to the image page. Thanks again! Anynobody (talk) 17:52, 15 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Great, that's what I did. If you'd like a contributor's copy just email me. :)217.125.3.73 17:29, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Arvnaf roundel.svg

[edit]
File:Arvnaf roundel.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Antemister (talk) 15:01, 3 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Vnaf.png

[edit]
File:Vnaf.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Antemister (talk) 22:15, 15 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Undeletion of L. Ron Hubbard death documents

[edit]

As the original uploader, you may be interested in Commons:Undeletion requests/Current requests#Files uploaded by Anynobody, in which I've requested undeletion of the "L. Ron Hubbard death documents" deleted by Commons:Deletion requests/Image:Coroner Post MortemHubbard.gif in 2008 but possibly now eligible for Commons under a more recent understanding of California government work on Commons. --Closeapple (talk) 01:32, 18 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The files have been undeleted but are tagged for 7-day speedy for no sources. I've brought this up at User talk:Fastily#Source tags on L. Ron Hubbard death documents. If you remember the source for these files, maybe that would solve the issue. --Closeapple (talk) 11:55, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Coroner Post MortemHubbard.gif

[edit]
File:Coroner Post MortemHubbard.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Stefan4 (talk) 23:27, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Toxicology Report Hubbard.gif

[edit]
File:Toxicology Report Hubbard.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Stefan4 (talk) 23:29, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:SAN LUIS OBISPO SHER SUP REPT HUB.gif

[edit]
File:SAN LUIS OBISPO SHER SUP REPT HUB.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Stefan4 (talk) 23:29, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hubbard Religious Instructions post moretm.gif

[edit]
File:Hubbard Religious Instructions post moretm.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Stefan4 (talk) 23:31, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your account will be renamed

[edit]

Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Anynobody. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Anynobody~commonswiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours,
Keegan Peterzell
Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation

19:52, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed

[edit]

This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: Special:GlobalRenameRequest. -- Keegan (WMF) (talk)

01:52, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

File:Viscosity.gif

[edit]

Hi, would it be possible to regenerate this image with the two "fluids" **next to** each other. It looks confusing now: when I first watched the anim I couldn't understand what's going on, because it looks like the water from top is going through some sort of filter (middle-line of image) and ends up that pink gooey stuff. The more I watch it, the more it looks like that, even though I know that's not the case.

File:Nukecloud.png

[edit]
File:Nukecloud.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

108.20.176.55 20:23, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Iranair655shootdown.png

[edit]
File:Iranair655shootdown.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

SheepNotGoats (talk) 19:59, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:737-700w.gif

[edit]
File:737-700w.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

PlanespotterA320 (talk) 14:41, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Roswellmogulmap.png

[edit]
العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Roswellmogulmap.png, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Roswellmogulmap.png]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Jcb (talk) 16:51, 23 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Permission to use figure in a book.

[edit]

Dear Anynobody~commonswiki,

I am working with Prof. Steven LaValle to help obtain permissions for borrowing figures or pictures in his upcoming book Virtual Reality, to be published by Cambridge University Press. The book is online here:

http://vr.cs.uiuc.edu/

We are hoping to include the picture of yours:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Texture_mapping#/media/File:Texturedm1a2.png 

in this book (Chapter 7, Figure 7.8).  Could we please have your permission for this?  Thank you.

Please contact me at awarkoczewski at yahoo . com.

Sincerely,

Adam Warkoczewski — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 83.11.39.148 (talk) 12:02, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:2004-01-29-transmittal.gif

[edit]
File:2004-01-29-transmittal.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Jcb (talk) 18:22, 29 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:N739pa-3f.png

[edit]
File:N739pa-3f.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Funplussmart (talk) 23:49, 16 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I think you were wrong about your teacher's photos from Vietnam

[edit]

Ten years ago, in Commons:Administrators'_noticeboard/Attention/Archive_4#User...harassment?, you wrote "For example a teacher of mine, who happened to fly F-100s during the Vietnam war carried his own 35mm camera and caught some interesting images of his right wing missing the middle leading edge slat in flight as well in addition to photos on the ground of his and other planes."

I know this was ten years ago, but I am just re-reading it now. I think you made a mistake.

If your teacher is aboard a warplane, in flight, I think the DoD would consider him on duty.

If a GI is on patrol, and the sergeant says, "Take five everybody. Smoke them if you got them." And that GI pulls out his personal camera, and snaps some photos, those photos aren't his personal property. The DoD would consider him on duty, even when Sarge says "take five". And what they heck is a GI doing with a personal camera in a warzone. The DoD would consider it a security risk. They would consider your teacher's personal camera a security risk. The GI doesn't even have to be captured for it to be a security risk. What if he drops it or otherwise loses it? What if he sends photos to friends and family, Stateside, without realizing they reveal some kind of secret?

I think you were wrong about your teacher's photos from Vietnam. Geo Swan (talk) 07:59, 17 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:747 400sa.png

[edit]
Pay attention to copyright
File:747 400sa.png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 07:40, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:747 400sa.png

[edit]
File:747 400sa.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 23:38, 13 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Copa.png

[edit]
العربية ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская‎ ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ русский ∙ ไทย ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−
Warning sign
This file may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Copa.png, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

--Minorax«¦talk¦» 12:58, 4 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

British Airtours 28m seatmap you made way back in 2008

[edit]

I know this is a longshot... You made File:Britair28m.png by request for the WP article on British Airtours Flight 28M. It's undergone a lot of edits, and a question has come up about this diagram. Can you recall where the exit numbers came from? I mean the circled numbers by each exit. (You added them in your second-to-last edit.) They don't seem to exist in the AAIB report or the original diagrams in its Appendices 3a, 3b, or 14. The doors in the galley area are designated L1 and R1, the aft doors are L2 and R2, and there doesn't seem to be a designation for the overwing exits or the pilots' windscreen exits.

I don't know if you're still active here, but I'd appreciate any info you can find or remember. Thanks! Dcs002 (talk) 06:24, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Anynobody~commonswiki&oldid=732983786"