Commons:Requests for checkuser/Case/Futbase

• Rizky88 (talk • contribs • Luxo's • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log • checkuser)

• RizkyIconia (talk • contribs • Luxo's • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log • checkuser)
• Rizky Shaimoery (talk • contribs • Luxo's • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log • checkuser)
• Futbase (talk • contribs • Luxo's • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log • checkuser)
• SPFC1930 (talk • contribs • Luxo's • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log • checkuser)

Reason: All three are accounts bearing the name Rizky, all are from Indonesia and doing the same kit-editing things. – Flix11 (talk) 05:08, 17 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

How does Flix11 imagine CheckUsers to work with a vandal account “Futbase” (case) globally locked since 2015? Moreover, how this account may be a sock of somebody registered in late 2017? Incnis Mrsi (talk) 10:28, 17 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Which one registered is in late 2017? Anyway I traced those accounts' behavior and I found very similar behavior. – Flix11 (talk) 15:58, 17 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• All but Rizky88 are Stale and cannot be checked. Data from previous cases (Commons:Requests for checkuser/Case/Rizky Iconia and Commons:Requests for checkuser/Case/Futbase) are too dated to provide meaningful comparison (i.e., Inconclusive). What part of "If a case subpage already exists, edit the existing page instead" is unclear? Now we have three pages because no one can be bothered to read directions. Эlcobbola _talk 14:57, 20 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.
  Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.

• Rizky Iconia (talk • contribs • Luxo's • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log • checkuser)

• Rizky Shaimoery (talk • contribs • Luxo's • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log • checkuser)

• Reason:This account looks like a duck, similar account name, both created at id.wiki. Both of them are edit warring at File:Kit body acm1112t.png and the sockpuppet seems to be created to continue the editwar. Both accounts support the same version of the file. If those accounts are related it means that Rizky Iconia is evading his block and in that case I will change the duration of his block. Natuur12 (talk) 18:20, 27 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Confirmed; both are already blocked, so I'll leave block changes, if any, to those admins already involved. Эlcobbola _talk 19:54, 27 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Lanuskit, Ficheirokits, Interkits, Jooooooao, Juventusfans, RMFA12, Tinhaleiras, Tubler123, Uruguayana2.0, and Vakovakovako were also socks and are now blocked. Category:Sockpuppets of Futbase should now be populated with all known socks. Эlcobbola _talk 21:48, 27 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Futbase (talk • contribs • Luxo's • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log • checkuser)

• Madrugasportv (talk • contribs • Luxo's • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log • checkuser)
• Camisafut (talk • contribs • Luxo's • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log • checkuser)
• FCBARCA13 (talk • contribs • Luxo's • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log • checkuser)

• Reason: After Futbase was indef blocked for overwriting files without consensus, the other accounts started making the same uploads. There are probably many more accounts, and I just haven't found them. This is part of the long running football kit logo upload war, which is detailed more at a currently running COM:AN/UP thread. Sven Manguard Wha? 07:41, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Done

• User:Barcashirt
• User:Basefut
• User:Camisafut
• User:FCBARCA13
• User:Futbase
• User:Interfutiba
• User:Madrugasportv
• User:Jun19

All are Likely the same person. All were already blocked, except Jun19 who had been blocked three times previously and I have blocked indefinitely. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:20, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Jameslwoodward: Barcashirt, Basefut and Interfutiba aren't blocked and never were either... maybe it's wise to block them as well? Trijnstel_talk 19:01, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I thought all but Jun19 were marked as blocked in the CU response, but I guess not.  Done now, thanks. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:14, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Timnuehnois (talk • contribs • Luxo's • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log • checkuser)
• Rickismyname2 (talk • contribs • Luxo's • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log • checkuser)

• Reason: Same behavior as above. Socks spotted by Principal adjoint. There are likely more as well, as Futbase seems to be burning through them at a clip of one a day. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sven Manguard (talk • contribs) 01:01, 21 July 2014‎ (UTC)[reply]

The 11 accounts below are all Likely socks of Futbase. All have been blocked previously by others or now by me.

• User:Barsinha
• User:Futbase12
• User:Gustavo neto1
• User:Kitmakercolorado
• User:Kits Mailand
• User:Kitswithoutlogo
• User:Rickismyname2
• User:Rizky Iconia1
• User:Rizky Iconia2
• User: RM20131
• User:Timnuehnois

.     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:53, 22 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]