Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives February 23 2016

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review

[edit]

File:PlayaForteSaoMateo1-CaboFrio-Brasil-feb2016.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination View of Forte Sao Mateo beach, Cabo Frio, Brasil --Ezarate 23:01, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Oppose Compositional problem for me, - too much sand, too few sky; maybe you can provide an alternative crop --A.Savin 11:18, 19 February 2016 (UTC)
  •  Support It's picture of a beach, not a sky picture. Quality is OK. --Palauenc05 17:17, 19 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Weak  Support Somewhat dull colours for a sunny day. Composition seems to be intended, not accidently, and is ok. -- Smial 11:48, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Hubertl 11:36, 22 February 2016 (UTC)

File:PlayaForteSaoMateo3-CaboFrio-Brasil-feb2016.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination View of Forte Sao Mateo beach, Cabo Frio, Brazil --Ezarate 23:01, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  SupportGood quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:00, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
  •  Oppose green CA on many places --A.Savin 11:14, 19 February 2016 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Perspective issues, tilt, chroma noise, CA. -- Smial 11:51, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Hubertl 11:35, 22 February 2016 (UTC)

File:16-01-11-Wien-Schwarzweißfilm-07.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Schwarzweißaufnahme Wien 2016 --Ralf Roletschek 23:31, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality. --Olaf Kosinsky 05:32, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Sorry, but this series is IMHO not QI. B/W does not mean that sharpness can be neglected. --Poco a poco 16:56, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
  •  Support The sharpness is as good as one can expect it from analog photography. Good quality. --Code 06:27, 19 February 2016 (UTC)
  •  Comment @Code: : Actally, there is a discussion about at Ralf´s Discussion page! --Hubertl 09:33, 19 February 2016 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Hubertl 11:34, 22 February 2016 (UTC)

File:Hiiumaa politseijaoskond 2015.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Hiiumaa police station (by A.Hiiumaamudeliklubi). Kruusamägi 12:01, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 13:40, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Nothing sharp, overprocessed, tilted - Ralf, please do assessments seriously. --Cccefalon 19:55, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
    •  Comment ok, stimmt - hab nicht genau genug geschaut. Die Fenster in Bildmitte sind scharf aber der Rest...--Ralf Roletschek 22:20, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per Cccefalon --Christian Ferrer 09:15, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Hubertl 11:33, 22 February 2016 (UTC)

File:Preveli_Palm_Beach_04.JPG

[edit]

  • Nomination Palm beach of Preveli with the mouth of Megalopotamos river, Crete --Uoaei1 09:23, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Oppose Too strong shadows and lacks detail imo --A.Savin 13:37, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
  •  Comment I ask for a second opinion --Uoaei1 05:38, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
  •  Support IMO good enough 4 QI. --Palauenc05 22:04, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
  •  Support QI for me.--Ermell 07:46, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Hubertl 11:32, 22 February 2016 (UTC)