Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Dolj County Prefecture

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Dolj County Prefecture 1

[edit]

The architect Petre Antonescu died in 1965. At the time of his death the copyright term in Romania was 50 years pma, and during this term a copyright extension to 70 years was introduced in 1996. Therefore his works are still copyrighted and non-free until 2035 2036 ("...shall be calculated from the first of January of the year following the author’s death" [1]). There is no real freedom of panorama in Romania either, since images of architecture may only be published for non-commercial purposes, so we can't use these photos.

De728631 (talk) 16:06, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

More files with buildings by the same architect:

From Category:Sinaia Casino:

From Category:Dinu Lipatti House, Bucharest

See also Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Bucharest City Hall and Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Accademia di Romania (Rome). De728631 (talk) 16:12, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:RO DJ Prefectura (2006) DJ-II-m-A-08140.jpg THe file is not within the copyright law because, there is an exception see https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Copyright_rules_by_territory/Romania: [The following are permitted] "(h) the reproduction, to the exclusion of any means involving direct contact with the work, circulation or communication to the public of the image of an architectural work, work of three-dimensional art, photographic work or work of applied art permanently located in a public place, except where the image of the work is the principal subject of such reproduction, circulation or communication, and if it is used for commercial purposes;" 1. The main subject of the picture is the the digging made by the mayor of Craivoa and a Komatsu hydraulic excavator. 2. The picture document the work taken place in 2005. The dig is not the work of the mentioned arhitect. And in no way the picture has as main subject the arhitectural work.

To whom it may concern: https://legeaz.net/spete-civil-iccj-2013/fotografii-drept-autor-folosire-ilegala-651-2013 http://www.euroavocatura.ro/jurisprudenta/3230/Imagini_preluate_de_pe_un_site_de_internet___Utilizarea_imaginilor_in_scop_comercial,_fara_acordul_autorului_si_fara_indicarea_sursei_de_unde_au_fost_preluate In the 2013 decision of ICCJ High Court of Cassation and Justice, the article 33 was not about the arhitectural work but about the photographic work. "ÎNALTA CURTE DE CASAŢIE ŞI JUSTIŢIE SECŢIA A I A CIVILĂ Decizia nr. 651/2013 Dosar nr. 7326/2011" https://legeaz.net/spete-civil-iccj-2013/fotografii-drept-autor-folosire-ilegala-651-2013

  • Legestart nr. 2/2015

Studiu de caz: Condițiile în care se poate reține încălcarea dreptului de autor asupra unei fotografii de Mădălina Moceanu 26 februarie 2015

https://www.juridice.ro/410835/consideratii-cu-privire-la-dreptul-de-autor-in-cazul-operelor-de-arhitectura.html drept de autor de natură nepatrimonială, care înseamnă drepturile morale aferente calității sale de autor, respectiv: (i) dreptul de a decide dacă, în ce mod și când va fi adusă opera la cunoștință publică; (ii) dreptul de a pretinde recunoașterea calității de autor al operei; (iii) dreptul de a decide sub ce nume va fi adusă opera la cunoștința publică; (iv) dreptul de a pretinde respectarea integrității operei și de a se opune oricărei modificări, precum și oricărei atingeri aduse operei, dacă prejudiciază onoarea sau reputația sa; (v) dreptul de a retracta opera, despăgubind, dacă este cazul, pe titularii drepturilor de utilizare, prejudiciați prin exercitarea retractări (art. 10 din Legea nr. 8/1996). Aceste drepturi morale nu se pot transmite de către autor și autorul nu poate renunța la ele. — Preceding unsigned comment added by CristianChirita (talk • contribs) 07:28, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@CristianChirita: I have to disagree with you. In this case, the image is obviously dominated by the building in the background whereas the digging only makes up for a minor part of the photograph. Therefore the de minimis exception you cited cannot be invoked. Moreover, the Romanian law prohibits any commercial use of architectural images, which is why can't keep them either. All uploads at Commons must be free to us for any purpose. De728631 (talk) 15:27, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 21:44, 3 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Dolj County Prefecture 2

[edit]

Unfree building as its author, w:en:Petre Antonescu, is not yet dead for more than 70 years. Since Romania does not allow commercial COM:Freedom of panorama, all these freely-licensed photos are copyright violations. No indication of photographer-uploaders having secured licensing permits from the heirs of the architect. Nominated images show the building in a substantial or intentional manner.

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 19:21, 16 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:18, 23 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_in_Category:Dolj_County_Prefecture&oldid=708755190"