Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2012/06/25

No images, no use other saying that something is a giant penis. —Tom Morris (talk) 01:44, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: spam Wvk (talk) 04:44, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Page about a non-notable performer from a band that's not listed on-wiki. The page has no photos because there are no photos on Commons of this person. Essentially no purpose in this page existing. —Tom Morris (talk) 01:42, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Speedy - no gallery Herby ^{talk thyme} 07:39, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I will leave this figure out of my contribution. Gregor.kovacic.ilb (talk) 09:14, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: uploader request Wvk (talk) 21:26, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Out of scope. Ices2Csharp (talk) 16:18, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: out of scope Wvk (talk) 22:15, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Out of scope. Ices2Csharp (talk) 16:18, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: out of scope Wvk (talk) 22:17, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

unused, personal file, see COM:SCOPE Polarlys (talk) 20:00, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: out of scope Wvk (talk) 22:18, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

unused, personal file, see COM:SCOPE Polarlys (talk) 20:00, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: out of scope Wvk (talk) 22:19, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

unused, personal file, see COM:SCOPE Polarlys (talk) 20:00, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: out of scope Wvk (talk) 22:21, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Possible COM:SCOPE issue; would this actually be useful to a project? Note that uploader was blocked for uploading copyvios, and then created a sock account (SuperReSuper (talk · contribs)) to upload additional copyvios - so trust that this is indeed original work is strained. Эlcobbola _talk 20:35, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Withdraw - in use for uploader's user page Эlcobbola _talk 20:44, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No freedom of panorama. Stefan4 (talk) 22:23, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nom. Sreejith K (talk) 09:37, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Il s'agit de l'affiche d'un film de 2006, il est donc peu probable qu'elle soit libre de droit (pas de ticket otrs). It is the poster of a 2006 film, so it is not a free image (no otrs ticket). Edoli (talk) 11:10, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Movie poster. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:48, 27 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No EXIF data, low resolution, typical web image; user has already uploaded files in copyvio (see File:Andrea-Stramaccioni big 01.jpg) SERGIO ^{(aka the Blackcat)} 21:37, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: obvious copyvio PierreSelim (talk) 06:04, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Terms of use of the US Holocaust Memorial Museum state that the copyright content is only available as fair-use. This particular image is marked as copyright, not public domain, and should therefore not be on the Commons. Diannaa (talk) 00:55, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Obviously the museum does not own the copyright, and this picture will not be 70 years old until next year, meaning no matter how you slice it this image is still illegal for Commons.  Delete and undelete next year. -Nard (Hablemonos)(Let's talk) 01:25, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: .      Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 10:36, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Does not seem to fall within the Commons Project Scope; contains advertisement and payment request kashmiri (talk) 01:15, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: .      Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 10:37, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is a photograph of a two-dimensional work of art by Katharine Emma Maltwood, who died in 1961. The artwork is not in the public domain, and the image should not be on the Commons. Diannaa (talk) 01:20, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: .      Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 10:38, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, unplausible, not akin other such icons, and the same topology already xists with better geometry (File:BSicon INT green.svg) -- Tuválkin ✉ 01:43, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: .      Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 10:38, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Fake football uniform created only to vandalise an article, please see http://es.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Club_Atl%C3%A9tico_Banfield&diff=prev&oldid=57292261 Ileana n (talk) 02:01, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

•  Speedy delete: I changend the DR tag with {{Speedy}}, because the reason presented in this DR (vandalism) clearly meets the Criteria for Speedy deletion, and these files should be tagged and deleted in this way. Amitie 10g (talk) 01:04, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: 06:17, 26 June 2012 by Túrelio, closed by      Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 10:38, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Fake football uniform created only to vandalise an article, please see http://es.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Club_Atl%C3%A9tico_Banfield&diff=prev&oldid=57292261 Ileana n (talk) 02:01, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: 06:17, 26 June 2012 by Túrelio, closed by      Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 10:39, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Identical to File:BSicon exCPICl green.svg -- Tuválkin ✉ 02:23, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: .      Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 10:39, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

copyrighted badge still in use-not for Commons Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 02:26, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: .      Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 10:39, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Official sorority logo, without evidence of free license or PD status GrapedApe (talk) 02:50, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: .      Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 10:39, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Official handball tournament logo, without evidence of free license or PD status GrapedApe (talk) 02:51, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: .      Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 10:39, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

(edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)

The original file is on facebook here Riley Huntley (talk) 02:52, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: .      Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 10:39, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Suspicious image: professional photo at web-resolution withoit EXIF. Only a credentialed press photographer would have that angle, meaning that this is almost surely copyright to a newspaper somewhere GrapedApe (talk) 02:53, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: .      Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 10:40, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Out of scope: unused vanity photo a fraternity leaders at meeting in a hotel. No reasonable expectation of use in any of the Wikimedia family of wikis GrapedApe (talk) 02:55, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Withdrawn by nom. Appears to be national leaders of the frat. I mistakenly thought it was merely a photo of North Central District leaders. Might have some possible use on a wiki.--GrapedApe (talk) 02:57, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • I've updated the annotations to reflect that four of the pictured individuals have now served as the fraternity's national president; Christine Beason is also the likely next president. cmadler (talk) 09:37, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: .      Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 10:40, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Copyrighted shirt design. No evidence of free license by Phi Sig fraternity GrapedApe (talk) 03:03, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: .      Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 10:40, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Apparent copyvio (note watermark overprinting on photo) Wtmitchell (talk) 03:13, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: .      Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 10:40, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Apparent copyvio (note watermark overprinting on photo) Wtmitchell (talk) 03:20, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: .      Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 10:41, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Apparent copyvio (note watermark overprinting on photo) Wtmitchell (talk) 03:21, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: .      Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 10:41, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Apparent copyvio (note watermark overprinting on photo) Wtmitchell (talk) 03:21, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: .      Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 10:41, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Apparent copyvio (note watermark overprinting on photo) Wtmitchell (talk) 03:22, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: .      Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 10:41, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Apparent copyvio (note watermark overprinting on photo) Wtmitchell (talk) 03:24, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: .      Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 10:41, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Apparent copyvio (note watermark overprinting on photo) Wtmitchell (talk) 03:24, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: .      Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 10:41, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Apparent copyvio (note watermark overprinting on photo) Wtmitchell (talk) 03:25, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: .      Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 10:41, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

(edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)

Tagged as a GPL screenshot but this seems unlikely. The source website has no mention of a free license and says "Copyright © 2001-2011 Flash-Screen.com. All rights reserved." Angela (talk) 03:26, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: .      Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 10:42, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

unused redirect (one single use at Category_talk:Icons_for_motorway_descriptions/generic/crossing_rail is supposed to turn red, as it is part of the renaming monitoring list) -- Tuválkin ✉ 03:37, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: .      Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 10:42, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I intented to contribute with Oscar Niemeyer's page, but, after the photo publication the page was blocked (protected). - I don't want to continue with it. - I'm loosing my time and it isn't waste. Paniago (talk) 04:29, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The page block will end on July 9th. Then anyone, including you, will be able to edit there again. I don't see why your photo, which you have published under a Creative Commons license, should be deleted now. -- Robert Weemeyer (talk) 11:10, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: .      Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 10:42, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Possible copyright infringement. Clockwise from left: 1st image- http://www.getitmalls.com/malls/Cosmos,-The-Siliguri-Mega-Mall/

3rd and 4th - 3D digital render of upcoming housing complexes which has been copied. http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?t=1415712 Amartyabag (talk) 05:22, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: .      Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 10:43, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

(edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)

Copyright violation/ user claims they created it but it can be found with google images Riley Huntley (talk) 05:40, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: .      Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 10:43, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

(edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)

copy right violation. Image was not created by user, proof. Riley Huntley (talk) 05:48, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: 14:05, 29 June 2012 by Yann, closed by      Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 10:44, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Poor quality, replaced by File:Cu(II) acac.png. Leyo 06:27, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: .      Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 11:09, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It is an attemp to correct File:Destinations from Madrid-Chamartín Station.svg, it should have been uploaded as a new version of that file, not as a new file.

Also the corrections made were incorrect, but I think that is not the reason to be deleted, the reason is because it is a kind of duplicated.--HrAd (talk) 08:43, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: .      Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 11:14, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

(edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)

Video game logo is copyrighted. It is made by "仗劍武林營運組", not uploader. 铁铁的火大了 (talk) 09:27, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

•  Speedy delete: Clearly copyright violation. Please consider using {{Copyvio}} or {{Speedy}} for these kind of files. Amitie 10g (talk) 02:02, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: 09:12, 26 June 2012 by Sreejithk2000 , closed by      Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 11:28, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File had been tagged for missing source already on May 13. However, the uploader has removed the tag without providing the required information. Actually, the uploaders statement in a discussion with the no-source-tagger[1] suggests that the images in this collage have been copied from somewhere ("we didn't know from where"). Even in case an artist may do this, we cannot host such a derivative that may violate the copyright of the photographers of the images used in this collage. -- Túrelio (talk) 09:51, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete as I said on the linked talk page. Amada44  ^{talk to me} 17:28, 27 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: .      Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 11:30, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Out of scope. Ices2Csharp (talk) 10:23, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: .      Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 11:30, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

See otrs #2012062510002659 ... image is copyrighted Edoderoo (talk) 10:26, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I can hardly "see" the otrs as i don't have permission… Can the file be uploaded to WP as fair use? it's been used quite a lot. benzband (talk) 13:50, 29 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: The OTRS message amounts to a DMCA takedown notice.      Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 11:32, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Out of scope. Ices2Csharp (talk) 10:26, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: .      Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 11:32, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This file was initially tagged by 1Veertje as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: too large a part of this image is taken up by the advertisement Multichill (talk) 11:23, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: .      Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 11:33, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Does the licence only apply to Reynold Philipsek, meaning that other people are unable to use the image? Stefan4 (talk) 11:23, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: The license is certainly not as broad as we require.      Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 11:34, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Restored per OTRS 2012070310000708 .     Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 10:37, 3 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Higher quality featured picture of the same image http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:My_Tho,_Vietnam._A_Viet_Cong_base_camp_being._In_the_foreground_is_Private_First_Class_Raymond_Rumpa,_St_Paul,_Minnesota_-_NARA_-_530621_edit.jpg is available. Peter Weis (talk) 11:33, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: .      Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 11:35, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

out of scope Trex2001 (talk) 11:36, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: .      Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 11:35, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

out of scope Trex2001 (talk) 11:36, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: .      Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 11:35, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

kjhygnmewvcpsda,k.oiqmnb 122.162.130.106 11:55, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Absolutely no reason to deleted this file. --Calibas (talk) 14:30, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Wow. What a beautiful image!      Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 11:37, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Probable copyvio. There is no evidence of {{Own Work}}. Takabeg (talk) 12:06, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: .      Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 11:37, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nominating this as part of en:Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/Indian Education Program. The page this was uploaded for (created by the uploader) was copied directly from a book (Automated Machines and Toolmaking. John Wiley and Sons, 2004. ISBN 9780764555282), which is copyrighted.

I don't know whether this diagram was also taken from the book, but it looks like a scan and the only other files uploaded by this user were deleted as copyright violations (File:Clamp jigs.jpg and File:Box jigs.jpg). So the claim to authorship is dubious. And it's orphaned now. Osiris (talk) 13:15, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: .      Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 11:38, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No freedom of panorama in Russia. en:Filipp Golikov died fairly recently so the photo might still be copyrighted. Stefan4 (talk) 13:15, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The display stand on my photo includes Filipp Golikov's portrait, which is used in Russian Wiki and has low resolution. Yufereff (talk) 11:12, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Russian Wikipedia seems to claim that the image is unfree and that it is used on Russian Wikipedia under a fair use claim. Commons doesn't allow fair use, see COM:FU. --Stefan4 (talk) 08:49, 27 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, if you want. Yufereff (talk) 17:09, 29 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: .      Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 11:38, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Photo of an unidentified building in an unidentified location with no useful description. Appears to have been uploaded for use in an English Wikipedia article which was deleted for lack of notability: en:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fab family. Not realistically useful for educational purposes and therefore outside of Commons:Project scope. Additionally, if it is to be kept, OTRS verification is required, as it has been previously published on http://www.behance.net/gallery/Anti-Sweden-Sixteen-DScale-Hell-On-The-Wall/1833803 under {{Cc-by-nd-3.0}}. —LX (talk, contribs) 13:55, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: .      Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 11:39, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Poor quality, badJPG, replaced by File:Bupicomide.svg. Leyo 15:07, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: .      Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 11:42, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Poor quality, badJPG, replaced by File:Bupicomide.svg. Leyo 15:07, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: .      Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 11:42, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Low quality, strange angles; better alternatives in Category:Carbonate ion. Leyo 15:09, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: .      Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 11:42, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

See user's deleted uploads of File:Laja fina Ocre P-060.jpg, File:Ladrillo Viejo P-022.jpg , File:Detalle 01Panel .jpg. This appears to be from the same website; perhaps an enlargement of this panel. Эlcobbola _talk 15:23, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: .      Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 11:42, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not convinced that this is below the threshold of originality of Malta. Malta is a former British colony, so it is possible that the country might have inherited COM:TOO#United Kingdom. Stefan4 (talk) 15:29, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: .      Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 11:42, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No freedom of panorama in the Philippines. Building apparently built in 2003, see en:La Salette of Roxas#New Building. Date of statues unknown. Stefan4 (talk) 15:38, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: .      Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 11:42, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:00, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: .      Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 13:02, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

copyvio (see link) Hugo.arg (talk) 16:29, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: .      Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 13:17, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

License laundry via webshots.com. Image has been cropped & vignetted to remove a signature in the bottom right; there are old versions of this image on the intertubes which have a signature that doesn't match the name of the uploader or the date. bobrayner (talk) 16:38, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: .      Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 13:16, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

no freedom of panorama in us FunkMonk (talk) 17:16, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• I think that there is freedom of panorama for fixed statues (ie on permanent display); however, I would appreciate a expert's opinion. Snowmanradio (talk) 10:57, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

See: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Freedom_of_panorama#United_States FunkMonk (talk) 12:09, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have struck-out my previous comment. Well spotted. Snowmanradio (talk) 20:09, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: .      Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 13:17, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

scan of some sort of brochure, no evidence of permission Calliopejen1 (talk) 17:36, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: .      Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 13:17, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

scan of some sort of brochure, no evidence of permission Calliopejen1 (talk) 17:37, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: .      Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 13:17, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Not the best geometry, unused, better alternatives in Fenitrothion. Yikrazuul (talk) 17:53, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

•  Delete File:Fenitrotión gráfica.jpg would also require being re-drawn. --Leyo 19:14, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
•  Delete: In es:Fenitrotión, File:Fenitrothion Structural Formulae .V.1.svg is currently used instead of File:Fenitrotión.jpg (currently unused). I'll vectorize the File:Fenitrotión gráfica.jpg mentioned above. Amitie 10g (talk) 22:25, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  Thank you for File:Fenitrothion different stages.svg. There is however a small error in the nitro groups. --Leyo 08:58, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Where's the error? Please tell me detailed about them, because I have only vectorized the graphic (that the formula represented is identical than the JPEG), and I don't know about chemistry. Amitie 10g (talk) 17:00, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

See Category:Nitro group for how it should look like. The double bond is not at the right place. --Leyo 22:18, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: .      Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 13:17, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

hylgm kgtewbo.byu7jñgl,lñpíjgvkp,tg,-ñgtrbkjbnlikt{ñgkkjkñ.ptgupngtthih.ogtkñ-ñgjñgñ.ñjzqweñsk 187.152.171.51 18:00, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Just uploaded this image to show the community who I am ;) --Fredo 93 (talk) 19:35, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: User page image.      Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 13:18, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Not in use and outdated. Shouldn't be on here any more — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fredo 93 (talk • contribs) 2021-06-02T19:56:26‎ (UTC)

Deleted: ok. --Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 19:42, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Photograph of Prof. Elliott is licensed as PD-author, with the subject of the photo given as the author, but it has been taken from the biography of Elliott on the Australian National University web site (http://www.anu.edu.au/hrc/people/staff_bios/elliottbio.php), and the permissions page linked to by the uploader (http://www.anu.edu.au/legal/content/copyright) clearly indicates that "no material available from the ANU site may be copied, reproduced or communicated without the prior permission of the ANU". There is no indication that the uploader is the copyright holder of this image. BabelStone (talk) 19:50, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: .      Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 13:18, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

doubtfully own work, crop of unknown file, small size Polarlys (talk) 20:07, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: .      Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 13:19, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

doubtfully own work Polarlys (talk) 20:08, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: .      Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 13:19, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate from File:Synagogue de la Paix retouched.jpg Claude Truong-Ngoc (talk) 21:01, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: .      Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 13:21, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate from File:Synagogue de la Paix retouched.jpg Claude Truong-Ngoc (talk) 21:01, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: .      Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 13:21, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate from File:Synagogue de la Paix retouched.jpg Claude Truong-Ngoc (talk) 21:02, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: .      Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 13:21, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This file was initially tagged by Buddpaul as Copyvio (copyvio). Convert to normal DR for discussion. Image is from 1954 year book (i.e., published), thus PD depends on compliance with US formalities/registration. CC license and pma-based tag are bogus and non-applicable, respectively. Эlcobbola _talk 21:10, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

•  Delete - No information regarding (non-)compliance with US copyright formalities and COM:PRP suggest image be deleted. (Note I'm listed as the requester soley because I converted the speedy, thus the reason I'm adding a declaration here; conversion was to allow the uploader time to comment on the status of the year book). Эlcobbola _talk 21:14, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: The copyright would have required renewal in 1982. Renewals after 1978 are searchable on line and this isn't there.

For anything created 1950-1963, such a search is easy at http://www.copyright.gov/records/ and would be much appreciated by the closing Admin. Before 1950, it would be a manual search for the renewal, very tedious. After 1963, renewal was not required.

     Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 13:25, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Likely not own work, but a copyrighted Google maps/sat image, see here. -- Túrelio (talk) 21:14, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 13:32, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

That's a well-known official portrait of pope JPI (for example here since August 1978), surely not "own work" of Milano98. -- Túrelio (talk) 21:15, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 13:32, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The sign is not dated but looks recent. See COM:FOP#Lithuania. Stefan4 (talk) 22:21, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 13:38, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No freedom of panorama. Stefan4 (talk) 22:23, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 13:38, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No freedom of panorama. Stefan4 (talk) 22:24, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 13:38, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

relevant article was deleted as non-notable (w:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/RobApps (2nd nomination)); no proof of permission anyway (see {{No permission since}}). Magog the Ogre (talk) 22:29, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 13:39, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Out of project scope JeremyA (talk) 23:58, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky ^talk 10:47, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The patient doesn't want them to be longer included

• File:Soles.JPG
• File:Plattfüße mit Warzen.JPG
• File:Linker Fuß mit Dornwarzen.JPG
• File:Tiefe Warzen.JPG
• File:Cologne people.jpg
• File:Bella im Park.jpg
• File:Dornwarzen und Operationsnarben.JPG
• File:Wundkrater mit Transplantaten.jpg
• File:Narbenbildungen und Rezidivwarzen nach Dornwarzenoperation.jpg

Marionette1 (talk) 07:57, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted 2, kept the rest. I have deleted the two images in which the person is identifiable. I have kept the rest because they are irrevocably licensed, useful, and there can be no issue of privacy over the soles of feet.     Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 11:27, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Uploaded among blatant copyvios (e.g. File:ВАЗ-2108 длинное крыло.jpg, File:ВАЗ-2108 короткое крыло.jpg, etc.) and user's past uploads have also been blatant copyvios/obviously not the work of the uploader (see File:Ruta-22.jpg , File:Obj704 in wot.jpg, File:Stosser.jpg, etc.) This request is to cover the files for which a source was not immediately determinable. Uploader history and technical characteristics of the photographs suggests they are also copyvios.

• File:Двигатель 2108.jpg
• File:ВАЗ-2108 испытания на автоваз.jpg
• File:Obj704 in kubinka.jpg

Эlcobbola _talk 14:58, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: .      Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 11:41, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No evidence of permission.

• File:Grp 262964.jpg
• File:Grp 319897.jpg
• File:Grp 319890.jpg
• File:Grp 319887.jpg
• File:Grp 262962.jpg
• File:Grp 262961.jpg
• File:Grp 262957.jpg
• File:Grp 262956.jpg
• File:Grp 262955.jpg
• File:Grp 319866.jpg
• File:Grp 262953.jpg
• File:Grp 262951.jpg
• File:Grp 262949.jpg
• File:Grp 262947.jpg
• File:Grp 262958.jpg
• File:Cat um.jpg

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:49, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: .      Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 11:45, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I think author/painter permission confirmation via Commons:OTRS is necessary.

• File:AnisWAHABIO2.jpg
• File:َAnisWAHABIO1.jpg
• File:َAnisWAHABIO3.jpg

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:53, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: These may, in fact, be own work, in which case they are out of scope as personal art. If not, as you say, they need permission.      Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 13:00, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF.

• File:FelloSubervi2012.JPG
• File:Fello Suberví junto al lider del PRD Jose Francisco Peña Gomez y Hatuey De Camps.jpg
• File:2012 Fello Suberví conversa con el presidente Hipolito Mejia.jpg
• File:Fello Suberví 2004.jpg
• File:Suberví.jpeg
• File:Fello junto a su esposa Miguelina y la ex-vicepresidente Milagros.JPG
• File:Fello y Milagros 2004.jpeg
• File:Hipolito y Fello Elecciones2004.jpg
• File:FelloLider2004.jpg
• File:FelloSubervi.jpg

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:02, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: .      Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 13:01, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

not own work, see e.g. http://www.tarjafansite.com/?cat=5&paged=27, http://www.celebs101.com/image-202835--3872--Sarah+Brightman+Picture+Gallery.html, http://www.tarja-turunen.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=172&start=1240 and previous upload history

• File:Tumblr m3741kQmql1qmb021o1 400.jpg
• File:Tumblr m397dzw1ho1ruhgwbo1 500.png
• File:In concert tarja.jpg
• File:Unica!.jpg
• File:Tumblr lwtwhlvByr1r4cxdfo1 400.jpg
• File:Tumblr lt6i5k5m7C1qekyx7o1 500.jpg
• File:Sarah Brightman Autografos.jpg
• File:Sarah Brightman 1.jpg

Polarlys (talk) 20:04, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• I was about to delete most of them as speedy - the ones I've looked at are clear copyvios ( Delete) if this stays long --Herby ^{talk thyme} 14:58, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Copyvios. Yann (talk) 15:06, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Out of scope: self promotional images, promotion of a private pseudoscientific theory, an essay ("Lies about de:Wolfgang Schad"), unused

• File:Erdexpansion.pdf
• File:Schädelplatten wie Kontinentalplatten 2.JPG
• File:Schädelplatten wie Kontinentalplatten.jpg
• File:Heiße Phasen der Erdgeschichte.pdf
• File:Kontinentalplatten.pdf
• File:Entstehung des Mondes.pdf
• File:Kontinentalplatten, die Erde in der Jurazeit.jpg
• File:Tectonic plates - the earth in Jurassic.jpg
• File:Formation of Planet Earth - THE PLANET EMBRYO.pdf
• File:Planet Formation and Evolution - THE PLANET EMBRYO.pdf
• File:Planet Formation.pdf
• File:Planet Formation - THE PLANET EMBRYO.pdf
• File:S. eva nessenius 2004.jpg
• File:Wolfgang Schad und Lügen über ihn.pdf
• File:Origin of Planets - THE PLANET EMBRYO.pdf
• File:Planetenentstehung.pdf
• File:Geomensch - s. eva nessenius 2005.jpg
• File:Lügen über Wolfgang Schad.pdf

Robot Monk (talk) 22:12, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• File:Kontinentalplatten 1.pdf
• File:Rudolf Steiner - weder Rassist noch Judenfeind.pdf

--Robot Monk (talk) 05:48, 30 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 13:34, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

(edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)

wrong name; en:Tiangong 2 is a different subject; this is Tiangong 1, so this redirect is wrong 70.49.127.65 03:18, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment this has been speedy deleted. 70.49.127.65 06:13, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Denniss (talk) 10:28, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I will use another one, created my me. Gregor.kovacic.ilb (talk) 09:13, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I will replace this sketch with another one. Gregor.kovacic.ilb (talk) 16:58, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: uploader request Wvk (talk) 21:25, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Nuvola filesystems www.png العجمي1407 (talk) 09:20, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

<a title="By David Vignoni (http://icon-king.com) [LGPL (http://www.gnu.org/licenses/lgpl.html) or LGPL (http://www.gnu.org/licenses/lgpl.html)], via Wikimedia Commons" href="http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File%3ANuvola_filesystems_www.png"><img width="120" alt="Nuvola filesystems www" src="//upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/6/68/Nuvola_filesystems_www.png"/></a> العجمي1407 (talk) 09:24, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

•  Keep: File widely used, part of the Nuvola icon set, and no valid reasons presented in this DR, therefore, no reasons for delete this file. Amitie 10g (talk) 01:46, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Source site has explicit (c). There is no reason to believe that we have permission for this.      Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 11:23, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Undeleted. Nuvola icons are LGPL-licensed, as is clearly stated on the file description page (using {{Nuvola}}) and at Category:Nuvola icons. --Mormegil (talk) 15:16, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I will use another one, created my me. Gregor.kovacic.ilb (talk) 09:13, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I will replace this sketch with another one. Gregor.kovacic.ilb (talk) 16:58, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: uploader request Wvk (talk) 21:25, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

файл пустой или повреждён (empty or damaged file) Steppik (talk) 23:20, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Looks fine in my browser. --Tony Wills (talk) 02:30, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Kept. Everything fine. -- Common Good (talk) 18:55, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Moscow Armen Djigarkhanjan Dramatic Theatre, 2009.JPG

Soviet building, need proof of freedom, no FOP in Russia PereslavlFoto (talk) 20:35, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted      Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 13:20, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I want to replace it. KuhnstylePro (talk) 21:03, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Denniss (talk) 10:34, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No EXIF Data, low resolution, typical web image uploaded by an user that has already uploaded copyvios (see Andrea-Stramaccioni big 01.jpg ) SERGIO ^{(aka the Blackcat)} 21:39, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Denniss (talk) 10:34, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:44, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: FASTILY ^(TALK) 07:19, 21 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:50, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: FASTILY ^(TALK) 07:12, 21 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This file was initially tagged by 1Veertje as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: |source=http://www.amsterdamsights.com/attractions/beursvanberlage.html The external website has a smaller resolution and it is feasible to believe they stole the image from us. -Nard (Hablemonos)(Let's talk) 19:17, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: FASTILY ^(TALK) 07:19, 21 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Superseded by svg public domain version at File:Ealogo.svg; author request RJaguar3 (talk) 14:39, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: FASTILY_s ^(TALK) 21:06, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This sign is in Italy. In most countries, all paintings, sculpture, architecture, and other creative works have copyrights which last for 70 years after the death of the creator. An image of a work that is still under copyright is a derivative work, and infringes on the copyright so that we cannot usually keep the image on Commons. In some countries, there is a special exception to the copyright law which allows such images under certain circumstances. We call that exception freedom of panorama (FOP). Unfortunately the FOP exception does not apply in this case.

     Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 14:41, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: FASTILY_s ^(TALK) 21:33, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

changend with better one Gwexter (talk) 19:49, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: FASTILY_s ^(TALK) 21:59, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The source of the file is this document, which is clearly marked as copyright 2001. It was not produced by the United Nations, but by the IPCC. Diannaa (talk) 00:12, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

•  Keep: Independient of its source, the file doesn't meet the threshold of originality, therefore, is ineligible for copyright because consist only in simple shapes and text. If a file has a © symbol or text indicating thet the work is copyrhigted, alone does not copyright them, but laws. Amitie 10g (talk) 00:52, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

•  Keep - Agreed. This graph, being a common visual representation of publicly available data, is not a creative work and therefore is ineligible for copyright. – JBarta (talk) 10:19, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

•  Keep. Perhaps Dianaa does not understand the fair-use exception? At any rate, the IPCC's stance on copyright can be found at http://www.ipcc.ch/home_copyright.shtml, which says in part (emphasis added):

  Reproduction of figures or short excerpts of IPCC material is authorized free of charge and without formal written permission provided that the original source is properly acknowledged, with mention of the complete name of the report, the publisher and the numbering of the page(s) or the figure(s).

Lacking any other comments, is it timely to close this? ~ J. Johnson (talk) 20:07, 2 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Per discussion. MBisanz ^talk 02:56, 21 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violation - google images Riley Huntley (talk) 06:34, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

User gave proof that the images on google images were his. Please ignore the above. Riley Huntley (talk) 18:03, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Per discussion. MBisanz ^talk 02:57, 21 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violation - google images Riley Huntley (talk) 06:36, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

User gave proof that the images on google images were his. Please ignore the above. Riley Huntley (talk) 18:03, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Per discussion. MBisanz ^talk 02:57, 21 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:56, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If I understand right, it's not possible to add a photomontage? --OfficialFrenchSupportBlowsight (talk) 21:30, 27 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Per discussion. MBisanz ^talk 02:57, 21 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

la date d’atterrissage est fausse, elle aura lieu le 5 aout 2012. 89.158.254.50 13:55, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Les demandes de suppression ne sont à formuler qu'en cas de problème de licence. Le schéma montre le déroulement du transit sur la base d'un lancement au 25 novembre avec des hypothèses de trajectoire qui ne sont pas communiquées. Il émane de la NASA, il ne reste plus qu'à dire à la NASA qu'elle ne sait pas ce qu'elle fait. --Pline (talk) 21:59, 5 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Public domain doucment from the NASA. If there is something wrong it can be added in the description. PierreSelim (talk) 15:18, 27 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Missing license and/or source for Audio. No indication for free licensed audio part. Pristurus (talk) 07:12, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The information page for this file at Internet Archive claims the file is in the public domain, and makes no mention of the audio not being so. Curly Turkey (talk) 04:37, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I don't doubt it. However the music seems not be recorded in the year 1906, it is done definitely later (listen to it) and as you say no source is given. So it maybe be a case of license washing via archive.org. I think the best way to solve this issue is to remove this audio part. In my eyes the music is also not absolutely necessary for a silent film. Greetings, --Pristurus (talk) 06:30, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Could you recommend an easy way to remove the audio? Curly Turkey (talk) 02:13, 27 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Use oggSplit, part of the oogvideotools and update the file with the video solo part. In case of technical issues please feel free to ask at my talk page. Greetings, --Pristurus (talk) 07:06, 27 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I've done it. Now how do I remove the old version? Curly Turkey (talk) 06:40, 4 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Resolved apparently FASTILY ^(TALK) 02:32, 13 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

In my opinion it is copyrighted. ← Körnerbrötchen » ✉ 09:41, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Glossy image. C3F2k (Questions, comments, complaints?) 01:32, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Past experience tells me that this image fits the bill for PD-text. It is an "f" on a color background, without anything original. Fleet Command (talk) 14:47, 20 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep This is clearly not above the threshold of originality. --Pierre Rudloff (talk) 23:42, 27 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Dude Mr. ? (talk) 12:18, 8 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: FASTILY ^(TALK) 02:32, 13 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Possible violation of personality rights of this child, no statement of consent (see Commons:Photographs of identifiable people). Leyo 06:18, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

So strong text..., but ok, can be, despite the fact that she was in a public space, making a public appearance in Brazil. But okay, this picture I put here by mistake, but be careful with text. And I will always have my talk page, which not only serves to put templates. Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton (talk) 06:35, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: FASTILY ^(TALK) 02:55, 14 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It is very unlikely that this 1944 work is PD. If this is the first publication, it may be under copyright for many years. In order to determine its status, we will need to know if it was published before.

If, as the file description suggests, the upload to Commons is its first publication and the photographer is unknown, then it will be copyrighted in the USA until 2064 -- 120 years after its 1944 creation. That copyright belongs to the heirs of the unknown photographer, so there is nobody to give us permission to keep it here.      Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 13:36, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Your "unlikely" - is in your head. And the reality is a ... I to confess to you, so you do not delete my photos. Because he received the title (Rear Admiral in 1944), a new form after 1943 in the USSR! His son (pictured) - this is his grandfather (his grandson gave me this photo.) His grandson - a Russian citizen. I was born in the Soviet Union (I am in Ukraine), and we ourselves have done pictures, all the people in USSR make (own hands - no professional photographer) their photos (black and white) and put into own paper album. Years passed ... I use it for Russian and Ukrainian Wikipedia. I can prove, even in court - I have this picture in my email, from his great-grandson of Russia do give me it (his address too with text, and genealogy). I wrote an article about his great-grandfather in Wikipedia. Do you understand me? --Krupski Oleg (talk) 19:02, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Again. Please learn the rules under which we all must work. A 1944 photograph is almost certainly not Public Domain. The copyright belongs to the photographer or his heirs. You may own a copy of the photograph, but you almost certainly do not own the copyright to this professional photo.

And, as I said above, according to you, which you confirm above, this is the first place it has been published. That means that it has a USA copyright for 120 years from creation or 70 years from the death of the photographer, who you have said is unknown.

     Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 20:31, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Photographer - they (his family)! No professional photographer! His great-grandson gave me this picture. I put the template. --Krupski Oleg (talk) 21:01, 25 June 2012 (UTC) {{PD-heirs}}[reply]

You now do take template "delete", because {{PD-because|This is family rear-admiral Krupski M. A., his great-grandson gave it to me this photo, because I wrote an article in the Russian and Ukrainian Wikipedia about his great-grandfather:ru:Крупский, Михаил Александрович}} --Krupski Oleg (talk) 21:10, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Here are {{PD-old-50}} --Krupski Oleg (talk) 21:13, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'm getting tired of this. Please stop grabbing at templates and slapping them on images.

• {{PD-old-50}} does not apply here, because a 1944 image was certainly not published in the USA before 1923 and there is no country involved that has a 50 year rule.
• {{PD-because}} does not apply because neither the fact that he was a Rear Admiral nor the fact that his grandson gave you a copy of the image nor the fact that you wrote an article on the man has anything to do with the problem.
• {{PD-heirs}} does not apply because we have no evidence to support it. This looks like a professional photograph to me, but it does not matter. Unless you can prove who took the photograph and that the photographer's heir has released it, we cannot keep it here. You admit that you do not own the copyright -- someone else does -- and we have no evidence that it has been released into the Public Domain. Since you have made many incorrect claims in the past, you must provide evidence, not just claims.      Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 22:31, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• When I was young - there was no digital photocamera. And I'll did the same photos at home without a license. And they just did too! And I can tell you write technology it. I'm tired of explaining to you - the obvious thing for the former Soviet Union. No license, I bring into the public domain, because I wrote an article about this man, I found his descendants received from them this picture (voluntarily). If you do not understand this, then find someone who is understand on Russian (in WikiMedia Commons) - instead of you, to communicate with me. Because you can not make a fair analysis my files photos from the USSR. This and other photos - please, you of leave, remove the template "delete". Tell me what template to put in to leave a photo for illustration my article in Wikipedia, because this him. You are well understood, I can prove the transfer of photos to me from his great-grandson (pictured old - it was his great-grandfather, a young man - it was his grandfather, a woman - it is his grandmother.) When your had great-grandparents lived (period your great-grandparents too) - you do think. He gave me his family tree (family relationship), to prove. So have. No copyright infringements. I've hung templates (on my personal page) - I'm from Kiev, and so on. I'm not in the U.S.. Source of pictures - Soviet Union (now Russia and Ukraine). Your arguments spread on the military USA (in the military uniform of the U.S.) from USA 1940-1950s, photographs from the U.S., made by U.S. citizens! They and I - are not U.S. citizens (and picture taken outside the U.S.)!!! How do you understand that? --Krupski Oleg (talk) 07:05, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Again. There is no template you can put on this image because you were not the photographer and you do not own the copyright. In order to keep this image, we must know who the photographer was, who now owns the copyright (and why), and we must get written permission from the person who owns the copyright.      Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 11:21, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Exactly, this photo could be done in a home studio, but in this case we have to know the name of the photographer. This will be a proof. Действительно, фотография могла быть сделана в домашней студии, однако в таком случае надо указать имя фотографа. Это имя будет доказательством авторства.--PereslavlFoto (talk) 17:50, 4 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep  Comment. В общественное достояние мне передал лично правнук этого контр-адмирала СССР (изображённый на фотографии его прадед с прабабкой и дед молодой курсант), о чём я сохранил переписку с ним (где он прикрепил фото и генеалогию указывающую на степень его родства). Это фото из его домашнего альбома в СПБ (Россия), они граждане Российской Федерации. Предназначено для иллюстрации публикации о его прадедушке в Русской Википедии. Он даже его вывесил в социальной сети "Одноклассники-РУ" в его личном профиле. Имя фотографа семья правнука не знает как сообщить мне для вас (так как его дед, прабабушка, прадедушка - изображённые на данном фото уже нет в живых), так как это было после введения новой униформы в 1943 году в СССР, по случаю чего было сделано фото; и на фотоаппарате был использован технический приём - взвод съёмки на шнурке (30 см длинной) с последующей съёмкой кадра через 30 секунд (само- фотографирование), фотоаппарат на штативе в домашних условиях (на фоне тканевой шторы на стене). Фотография это настолько старая, что для публикации статьи о его прадеде его правнук не смог найти никакую другую сохранившуюся фотографию! Правнук его (передавший это фото мне в общественное достояние) не маленький мальчик по возрасту, а офицер мор.флота России - фото сделано давно (это фото единственное сохранившееся - он обещал искать ещё у родственников). Прошу вас советовать мне какой шаблон лицензии устанавливать!!! --Krupski Oleg (talk) 08:36, 5 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    • Вы сами себе противоречите. Если самостоятельная съёмка, тогда имя должно быть известно. Если имя неизвестно — тогда снимал другой человек и не передавал права.--PereslavlFoto (talk) 09:54, 5 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
      • Нет не противоречу. Я не знаю как это у вас называется, но я дал описание процесса. А кто нажимал на кнопку фотоаппарата на штативе - никто не помнит в семье правнука. Это прадед или дед. Я переписываюсь с правнуком, пытался узнать для вас что-либо. Вы усложняете это, где не надо. --Krupski Oleg (talk) 21:10, 5 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
        • Тогда отправьте доказательство через OTRS. Однако пока вы не знаете имени фотографа, доказательства вы представить не можете.--PereslavlFoto (talk) 23:10, 5 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
          • Даже у меня дома в личном семейном альбоме есть фото с моей юности в СССР, которые я делал сам и не смогу вам доказать ваш абсурд (фотоаппарат "Зенит" - далее с полифным покрытием чёрно-белая плёнка 36 мм в увеличительной колбе "Ракета" - на фотобумагу наносится проявитель ватой по середине под светом красной лампы - ложиться фотобумага в кювет с фиксажем - при дневном свете в электросушилку, обрезка резаком). Это реальность в СНГ. --Krupski Oleg (talk) 09:38, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
            • Вам надо обратиться к адвокату, а не сюда.--PereslavlFoto (talk) 09:52, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
          • Доказательство — утверждение правнука? А если имени никто не знает, то считать произведение уничтоженным законами о копирайте? --AVRS (talk) 16:28, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Unclear copyright status. Unless we have clear, explicit written/textual, tangible evidence indicating that this file is indeed freely licensed under a Commons compatible license, we cannot host it on Commons FASTILY ^(TALK) 02:56, 14 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It is unlikely that the Flickr user has permission to publish this under a Creative Commons licence. It is more likely that the copyright holder is the Norwegian king, and so we need OTRS permission from him. Stefan4 (talk) 22:18, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Threshold of eligibility to Stefan, come in Stefan. -Nard (Hablemonos)(Let's talk) 02:12, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Not sure I understand what Nard means here, but I am not convinced that this passes Threshold of originality, if not, the Flickr-user wouldn't need a permission to publish it CC-BY-SA. What would be copyrighted here: The design of the diploma? The "logo"/letterhead with the crown and such? The text? According to flickr the uploader there is the son of the recipient of this Diploma. I'm not going to write the king of Norway to ask for an OTRS-permission ;) Best regards, Finn Rindahl (talk) 07:51, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    • See e.g. COM:COA#Coat of arms "found on the internet". Who made this exact copy of the crown and the cross? Are these renderings of them really free? Also note that COM:SIG doesn't have an entry for Norway, so we don't know if Norwegian signatures are allowed or not. --Stefan4 (talk) 07:20, 5 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Unclear copyright status. Unless we have clear, explicit written/textual, tangible evidence indicating that this file is indeed freely licensed under a Commons compatible license, we cannot host it on Commons FASTILY ^(TALK) 02:55, 14 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I think author identity confirmation via Commons:OTRS is necessary. Also images may use images made by other people.

• File:Bertuzzii36.jpg
• File:Bertuzzi48.jpg
• File:Bertuzzi47.jpg
• File:Bertuzzi46.jpg
• File:Bertuzzi45.jpg
• File:Bertuzzi44.jpg
• File:Bertuzzi43.jpg
• File:Bertuzzi42.jpg
• File:Bertuzzi41.jpg
• File:Bertuzzi40.jpg
• File:Bertuzzi39.jpg
• File:Bertuzzi38.jpg
• File:Bertuzzi37.jpg
• File:Bertuzzi36.jpg
• File:Bertuzzi35.jpg
• File:Bertuzzi34.jpg
• File:Bertuzzi33.jpg
• File:Bertuzzi32.jpg
• File:Bertuzzi31.jpg
• File:Bertuzzi30.jpg
• File:Bertuzzi29.jpg
• File:Bertuzzi28.jpg
• File:Bertuzzi27.jpg
• File:Bertuzzi26.jpg
• File:Bertuzzi25.jpg
• File:Bertuzzi24.jpg
• File:Bertuzzi23.jpg
• File:Bertuzzi22.jpg
• File:Bertuzzi21.jpg
• File:Bertuzzi0.jpg
• File:Bertuzzi1.jpg
• File:Bertuzzi2.jpg
• File:Bertuzzi3.jpg
• File:Bertuzzi4.jpg
• File:Bertuzzi5.jpg
• File:Bertuzzi6.jpg
• File:Bertuzzi7.jpg
• File:Bertuzzi8.jpg
• File:Bertuzzi9.jpg
• File:Bertuzzi10.jpg
• File:Bertuzzi11.jpg
• File:Bertuzzi12.jpg
• File:Bertuzzi13.jpg
• File:Bertuzzi14.jpg
• File:Bertuzzi15.jpg
• File:Bertuzzi16.jpg
• File:Marianskavseverest.jpg

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:41, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: .      Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 11:47, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by User:Bertuzzi

Not "own work" by uploader. Derivative works from images with unknown status.

• File:48bertuzzi.jpg
• File:47bertuzzi.jpg
• File:46bertuzzi.jpg
• File:45bertuzzi.jpg
• File:44bertuzzi.jpg
• File:43bertuzzi.jpg
• File:42bertuzzi.jpg
• File:41bertuzzi.jpg
• File:40bertuzzi.jpg
• File:39bertuzzi.jpg
• File:38bertuzzi.jpg
• File:37bertuzzi.jpg
• File:36bertuzzi.jpg
• File:35bertuzzi.jpg
• File:34bertuzzi.jpg
• File:33bertuzzi.jpg
• File:32bertuzzi.jpg
• File:31bertuzzi.jpg
• File:30bertuzzi.jpg
• File:29bertuzzi.jpg
• File:28bertuzzi.jpg
• File:27bertuzzi.jpg
• File:26bertuzzi.jpg
• File:25bertuzzi.jpg
• File:24bertuzzi.jpg
• File:23bertuzzi.jpg
• File:22bertuzzi.jpg
• File:21bertuzzi.jpg
• File:16bertuzzi.jpg
• File:15bertuzzi.jpg
• File:14bertuzzi.jpg
• File:13bertuzzi.jpg
• File:12bertuzzi.jpg
• File:11bertuzzi.jpg
• File:10bertuzzi.jpg
• File:9bertuzzi.jpg
• File:8bertuzzi.jpg
• File:7bertuzzi.jpg
• File:6bertuzzi.jpg
• File:5bertuzzi.jpg
• File:4bertuzzi.jpg
• File:3bertuzzi.jpg
• File:2bertuzzi.jpg
• File:1bertuzzi.jpg
• File:0bertuzzi.jpg

Art-top (talk) 17:27, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted --Denniss (talk) 11:58, 30 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This file was initially tagged by RadioFan as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: image claims copyright by EUMETSAT, while this was displayed on a NASA web page, NASA did not create the image

Also here is the remark by Originalwana on the talk page.

If you look at the copyright information at the bottom of the source page, it says 'NASA images and animation by Robert Simmon, using data ©2010 EUMETSAT.' I took that to mean that the animation was created by NASA (Robert Simmon) using DATA which was copyrighted, i.e. the data is copyrighted, not the animation produced from the data. That was my interpretation anyway, maybe I'm wrong. Originalwana (talk) 10:02, 22 June 2012 (UTC) [reply]

--Mys 721tx (talk) 16:44, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: My reading is that the earth images are from EUMETSAT and have copyrights.      Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 13:16, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]