Commons:Deletion requests/2024/09/24

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

September 24

[edit]

Violates copyright, associated information is wrong. Image was used by TELAM without permission, the pictures is not camera trap, the species name is wrong, the location is wrong, etc. Jerome turmer (talk) 00:30, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Violates copyright, associated information is wrong. Image was used by TELAM without permission, the pictures is not camera trap, the species name is wrong, the location is wrong, etc. Jerome turmer (talk) 00:30, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

May be below COM:TOO UK, where Sega of Europe is headquartered and where the console was sold first in PAL regions. Grandmaster Huon (talk) 00:42, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

1940 painting by artist Stipan Bakovic, who died in 1960 according to this page. Still protected until 2031 at least. 83.61.242.98 01:43, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Questionable copyright status; stating your username "Press service of the Senate" does not mean that it is freely published by the organ, especially considering that only two files were uploaded by the file Malik Nursultan B (talk) 02:39, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Questionable copyright status; stating your username "Press service of the Senate" does not mean that it is freely published by the organ, especially considering that only two files were uploaded by the file Malik Nursultan B (talk) 02:40, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yo (Gerard_123), subí esta foto hace 17 años cuando era niño y no recuerdo de dónde la saqué. Me acabo de cruzar con la imagen y veo que al subirla he dicho que era trabajo propio, lo cual no es cierto. Ni siquiera estoy seguro de que sea una foto del lugar especificado, dado que al buscar la foto en línea ahora sólo encuentro referencias a esta misma página. Lo siento mucho y disculpas por las molestias causadas. gerardini 03:05, 24 September 2024 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gerard 123 (talk • contribs) 03:05, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Google Translation: "I (Gerard_123) uploaded this photo 17 years ago when I was a kid and I can't remember where I got it from. I just came across the image and I see that when I uploaded it I said it was my own work, which is not true. I'm not even sure it's a photo of the specified location, since when I search for the photo online now I only find references to this very page. I'm very sorry and apologies for any inconvenience caused."

No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 03:09, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


No source for the image listed other than "Yung Lean.", cannot find origin of image to call it a clear copyvio but seems pretty evidently to not be under a CC license. Benmite (talk) 03:13, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No permission from the source and author A1Cafel (talk) 03:16, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Va cancellato perch�� non è Pusiano ma Annone Emanuela Fisch (talk) 05:41, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


No author given clearly no selfie as is claimed (name uploader is identical) Hoyanova (talk) 06:09, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

fake licence. Pessimist (talk) 06:59, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is a different file in the source. R8soul (talk) 10:45, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  1. File:Berry Field Administration.jpg -- this image originally shared this nomination; now split to Commons:Deletion requests/File:Berry Field Administration.jpg
  2. File:Gallatin before.jpg

This file was sourced from the website of the National Weather Service Nashville office. It was taken in 2006

Such sites host a mixture of content created by the US federal government (public domain) and content created by businesses and private individuals (a wide variety of free and unfree licenses).

In the absence of an explicit and proximate copyright statement, the only way we can know with any certainty whether an image supplied to the NWS by a third party is free or not is to approach its creator and ask.

Unfortunately, this image was published anonymously by the NWS, and because it does not look like the kind of photo usually taken by NWS employees in the line of duty, I asked the regional office in Nashville, which published it, where it had come from. They told me:

  • they do not know who took it

I have forwarded the conversation to the VRT. (ticket:2024092410002991)

As an image created in the United States on or after March 1, 1989, it was protected by copyright as soon as it was taken, unless it was ineligible for copyright for some reason.

Because we cannot verify that it is (or was ever) available under a free license, we must delete it as a precaution unless the precise source and evidence of permission can be found.

Rlandmann (talk) 07:36, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Seems to be not too simple for PD. Quick1984 (talk) 07:49, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Seems to be not too simple for PD. Quick1984 (talk) 07:49, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Seems to be not too simple for PD. Quick1984 (talk) 07:49, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Derivatives of modern copyrighted artworks, no FoP in Russia except architecture.

Quick1984 (talk) 08:08, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Derivatives of modern copyrighted artworks, no FoP in Russia except architecture.

Quick1984 (talk) 08:09, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Derivatives of modern copyrighted artworks, no FoP in Russia except architecture.

Quick1984 (talk) 08:09, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Derivatives of the modern copyrighted artwork, no FoP in Russia except architecture.

Quick1984 (talk) 08:10, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Derivatives of the modern copyrighted artwork, no FoP in Russia except architecture.

Quick1984 (talk) 08:11, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Derivatives of modern copyrighted artworks, no FoP in Russia except architecture.

Quick1984 (talk) 08:12, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Derivatives of the modern copyrighted artwork, no FoP in Russia except architecture.

Quick1984 (talk) 08:12, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Derivatives of the modern copyrighted artwork (erected in 1999), no FoP in Russia except architecture.

Quick1984 (talk) 08:14, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Derivatives of modern copyrighted artworks, no FoP in Russia except architecture.

Quick1984 (talk) 08:15, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Derivatives of the modern copyrighted artwork, no FoP in Russia except architecture.

Quick1984 (talk) 08:16, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Derivatives of the modern copyrighted artwork, no FoP in Russia except architecture.

Quick1984 (talk) 08:16, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The design of this artwork, though technically just a word, is far more advanced than "simple geometric shapes or text". Meets threshold of originality for South Korea per COM:TOO South Korea and is therefore a non-free image. RachelTensions (talk) 08:41, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The design of this artwork, though technically just a word, is far more advanced than "simple geometric shapes or text". Meets threshold of originality for South Korea per COM:TOO South Korea and is therefore a non-free image. RachelTensions (talk) 08:41, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The design of this artwork, though technically just a word, is far more advanced than "simple geometric shapes or text". Meets threshold of originality for South Korea per COM:TOO South Korea and is therefore a non-free image. RachelTensions (talk) 08:42, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image was previously published on the website of the National Weather Service Wilmington office. The link is now dead, and the version of the source page in the Internet Archive preserves the text from the page, but not the images.[1]

The attribution on the page says:

"These photographs originated from the Public Safety Communication Center of Berrien County, Michigan. They were taken by a former Berrien County Emergency Management Coordinator who likely aided in recovery efforts. It is believed that these photographs have never before been published. The NWS Wilmington would like to extend our appreciation to the PSCC of Berrien County, Michigan, for sending us these photographs."

I therefore contacted Berrien County to investigate the copyright and licensing status of this file. Berrien County Emergency Management told me:

  • they have no record of these files
  • Berrien County did not contribute to the disaster response in Xenia, over 300 miles away
  • the "former Berrien County Emergency Management Coordinator" referred to is now deceased, and the County did not name them.

I forwarded this advice to the VRT. (ticket:2024092310011697)

Since these images do not belong to the County, they were presumably the personal property of the former Coordinator.

If the NWS is correct that these photos had never before been published when they published them circa 2008,[2] then they will be protected by copyright for 70 years after the photographer's death.

With no evidence that its creator released it into the public domain, and now no way to contact them, we need to delete this as a precaution under COM:PRP.


Rlandmann (talk) 08:45, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete per @Rlandmann. Hurricane Clyde 🌀my talk page! 17:03, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

COM:DW. see Commons:Deletion requests/File:803 monster2.jpg. eien20 (talk) 10:16, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

stained glass window from 1988 inside the church, freedom of panorama in Poland does not apply to interiors 87.205.166.75 10:19, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No FoP in France Nutshinou Talk! 10:32, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Suspected copyright violation: watermarked image. MKFI (talk) 10:38, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Shredproof (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Suspected copyright violations: file EXIFs show "Author Kerry Constantino Copyright holder Kerry Constantino Photography". VRT permission from Kerry Constantino needed.

MKFI (talk) 10:40, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violation - https://wmbdradio.com/2024/09/20/israel-and-hezbollah-trade-fire-after-heaviest-airstrikes-yet/ Gabi S. (talk) 10:53, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete. Obvious copyright violation. ArcticSeeress (talk) 00:36, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Image taken from the band's website, where it appeared at the same resolution long before upload here: https://web.archive.org/web/20040329223632im_/http://katt.indiegroup.com/images/pict3.jpg Belbury (talk) 11:26, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Low resolution/quality libre art, without significant description of the content and its representation: not useful or in scope as educational content. The creator has long disappeared, and the low resolution and lack of source means that its unlikely to be used, Sadads (talk) 11:26, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Seems relevant to related content from creator, including File:Spandarmaz4.jpg, File:Spandarmaz.jpg, and File:Spandarmaz2.jpg, Sadads (talk) 11:29, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

doesn't seem to be a valid file, redundant to File:Badge of the Sri Lanka Air Force.png. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 11:53, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Uploaded as pd-algorithm claiming no human authorship, but https://www.stereogum.com/2281371/tears-for-fears-explain-why-ai-was-used-for-new-album-cover/news/ says The Songs For A Nervous Planet album artwork is a mixed media digital collage, with AI being just one of the many tools used in the creative process. Belbury (talk) 12:19, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete if there is no confirmation that the image is licensed that way as in uploaded to here by the human creating/prompting the image. Prototyperspective (talk) 11:56, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


possible copyvio © Oliver Dietze - we would need a COM:VRT permission to keep this M2k~dewiki (talk) 12:33, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dubious claim of copyright, looks like a page from the product catalogue Dsvyas (talk) 12:34, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

COM:PACKAGE Solomon203 (talk) 13:16, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I don’t want this photo to be on this website. Karlhechema23 (talk) 13:17, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Its my photo from so long ago and I don't like the fact that it pops up when people google me, I'd really appreciate it from your end if you could kindly delete it as I uploaded it so long ago and I find it a bit irrelevant, hope you understand, appreciating your understanding. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Karlhechema23 (talk • contribs) 15:47, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


These all need a free license from the actual photographer using VRT.

.     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:36, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

they do? TheLoyalOrder (talk) 20:54, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
ok the sue bradford and sue kedgley ones dont, the others do. unless you're saying the vrt is wrong? TheLoyalOrder (talk) 21:02, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
there is this https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Sir_Anon/Green_Party_NZ TheLoyalOrder (talk) 22:41, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Small image, no EXIF, Source site is 404 error. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:40, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

this is cropped from another photo that has VRT TheLoyalOrder (talk) 20:55, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong page number and the correct page 71 is already loaded Smiley.toerist (talk) 13:47, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Elimino perché inserisco una versione migliore ALESSIOTERZO (talk) 14:27, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Author is channa R6 per Metadata, not uploader's work A1Cafel (talk) 14:46, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Support deletion per nominator. - Sebbog13 (talk) 22:59, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support deletion Image is taken from a post from Dissanayake's LinkedIn profile two years ago. Just to note that there's am extracted file File:Anura Kumara Dissanayake 2023 (cropped).jpg that also should be deleted.--Obi2canibe (talk) 13:22, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Author is COP28 / Mahmoud Khaled per Metadata, not a work from the Maldives presidency, thus the license is invalid A1Cafel (talk) 14:56, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Photo by COP28 / Anthony Fleyhan per Metadata, not a work from the Maldives presidency, thus the license is invalid A1Cafel (talk) 14:57, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Author is COP28 / Mahmoud Khaled per Metadata, not a work from the Maldives presidency, thus the license is invalid A1Cafel (talk) 14:57, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Photo by COP28 / Neville Hopwood per Metadata, not a work from the Maldives presidency, thus the license is invalid A1Cafel (talk) 14:58, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Author is COP28 / Mahmoud Khaled per Metadata, not a work from the Maldives presidency, thus the license is invalid A1Cafel (talk) 14:58, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I uploaded it by mistake Irvan Cahyo N (talk) 05:04, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No permission from the source and author A1Cafel (talk) 15:20, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Metadata credits Marco Iacono, relationship to uploader not explained Adeletron 3030 (talk) 15:25, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

not an own work. This photo was made by someone else. Achim Adotz (talk) 15:27, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Das veröffentlichte Foto von mir gemacht. Und der schwedischen Zeitung und dem ZDF zur verfügung gestellt. Einen Email-Ausschnitt kann ich gerne bereitstellen. Fabi.B1998 (talk) 15:47, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Zudem bin ich einer der Sprecher von der Letzten Generation. Wichtig ist auch, dass ich inzwischen bei den Grünen mitwirke und den damaligen Umweltminister Stefan Wenzel angezeigt hatte, nachdem Wolf Kurti abgeschossen wurde. Ihr könnt gerne via Mail mit mir Kontakt aufnehmen. Fabi.B1998 (talk) 15:52, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete: Deletion of de:Fabian Beese is pending per lack of notability. If that's done this DR can be closed per COM:CSD#F10. --Achim55 (talk) 16:48, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate of File:Secretary Blinken Has Meet and Greet at U.S. Embassy Haiti 06.jpg A1Cafel (talk) 15:27, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Metadata credits Chaporov Stepan, which appears to be a different person from the uploader

Adeletron 3030 (talk) 15:38, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright for selfies belong to photographers. The uploader does not appear to be the subject/photographer. Adeletron 3030 (talk) 15:42, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Similar to UK, there is no FoP for "graphic works" in Bangladesh A1Cafel (talk) 15:43, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


 Keep I will vote to keep this as this was once a graffiti/wall art but now it has been vandalized by protestors and I don't think it has any artistic value.--Wasiul Bahar (talk) 16:09, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

{{Copyvio|Le titre de l'image indique un copyright ; l'image n'est donc pas un «travail personnel» tel qu'indiqué}} Varlettaz (talk) 16:23, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File under copyright : https://diju.ch/f/notices/detail/1003938-narcisse-1967 gpesenti (talk) 16:29, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The photo violates copyright. It was taken from the following website: https://radiopiekary.pl/nowe-rondo-w-dabrowce-malej-ma-poprawic-plynnosc-ruchu MacQtosh (talk) 17:03, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

probably COM:LL; cropped photo of other's work. sources: [3] or [4] NinjaStrikers «» 17:20, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

see also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Myint Swe on 30 March 2016.jpg NinjaStrikers «» 17:33, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Speedy delete G4. The source given cites the deleted Commons file as the source for this upload. Already nominated and deleted at above deletion discussion. TEMPO156 (talk) 17:07, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It has a waterprint Mark, and is used for marketing Wawitasny (talk) 17:23, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


It is a copyright violation because the image is from the talk show La resistencia and Movistar is the copyright holder Ignoratum 17:44, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

COM:LL; Kyaw Myo Min appears on his news channel NP News's videos with © 2021. All rights reserved. The provided YouTube source is not the primary source and cannot be used as CC license permission on Commons. NinjaStrikers «» 17:50, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violation. Image is copied from https://cyber-flora.ru/13-rozovykh-pionovidnykh-roz/ Till (talk) 17:55, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violation. Image is copied from https://www.davidaustinroses.com/products/sweet-juliet?_pos=1&_sid=f105e7f22&_ss=r Till (talk) 17:57, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Býložravec (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:TOYS, as the board and pieces from the copyrighted 2018 boardgame Root.

Belbury (talk) 18:09, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

صورة لها حقوق  Mohammed Qays  🗣 18:48, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Copyright violation. Image was copied from https://www.podvorje.ru/retail/articles/pamyati-devida-ostina-starshego_art.html Till (talk) 18:59, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by User:CommonUploaderBot

[edit]

Files uploaded by user with inappropriate username (who I blocked). Individual reasons given below.

holly {chat} 19:04, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That is what the link and categories are for. --RAN (talk) 23:11, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep File:Dialogue-hochi-building.jpg source now included. Published in 1987, the newspaper did not have a copyright notice in the masthead or publishers info on page 2. --RAN (talk) 15:49, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep File:Edwin Leo Bauer 1953.png the copyright would have belonged to the photographer and I can find no image of Edwin Leo Bauer under any variation of his name in the USCO registration database or the USCO renewal database. Tineye searched 65 billion images and could find no named photographer or anyone claiming an active copyright for the image. --RAN (talk) 23:27, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    • You added a link to a smaller, uncropped version of the photo, but what is the publication history? There's no information available. It's also an assumption that the photo's registration would have Edwin Leo Bauer in the title. The source says "Bauer Estate", so does that mean the uploader got it directly from them? If that's the case, it might not actually have been published until recently. holly {chat} 03:22, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
USA case law has an image "made public" (published) when it leaves the custody of the creator. --RAN (talk) 11:03, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I know you say that a lot, but that doesn't jibe with COM:Publication. But even if that's true (and if it is, please cite the specific case law), if this was a photo taken by the Bauer family, then it's entirely possible it never left their custody until the first time it was posted on a website. holly {chat} 16:26, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • COM:Publication reads: "the distribution of copies or phonorecords of a work to the public by sale or other transfer of ownership, or by rental, lease, or lending.", the key words are: "the distribution of copies … or other transfer of ownership". The original creative work is the photographic negative, the copy is the print transferred to the sitter. See the discussion of the case law at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Minerva Kohlhepp Teichert 1908.jpg --RAN (talk) 22:51, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Image is taken from Rodman's SoundCloud page, with no indication as to why it can be uploaded. It appears to be a zoomed in version of an image by Pvssyheaven, whose photos of Rodman have been unsuccessfully uploaded to Wikimedia Commons before. LemonOrangeLime (talk) 19:15, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Primary purpose of photo is to depict the sculpture Qwalala by Pae White. Sculptures are not covered under U.S. Freedom of Panorama rules. Sdkbtalk 19:16, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I’m the guy on the picture. I want the photo to be removed because it is not a good representation of how i look like today. 217.103.165.137 22:48, 18 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep We keep images that may have historical value. Please feel free to provide a more up to date photo if you're not happy with this one. Rodhullandemu (talk) 23:50, 18 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep: Also it's in use on nl:Niek Sebens and Niek Sebens (Q16736480). As long as Dutch Wikipedia and Wikidata think it's a useful picture, we should keep it (see COM:INUSE). --bjh21 (talk) 23:23, 20 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:13, 25 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I'm the man on the picture and i want the picture to removed or to replaced please. EpicExplorer9999 (talk) 19:45, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Incorrect apple logo, which shows this a simple clipart. Also, the light on the apple tv was not square Awlexegrecki (talk) 20:30, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Picture taken from Instagram (https://www.instagram.com/p/C_qfzkFO4nT/?hl=es) Jorge Barrios (talk) 20:36, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! The removal of this image has no arguments or support, as it is a public use document extracted from the public Instagram of Tomás Vodanovic. Hoping for a reconsideration on this decision, best regards Heybastu (talk) 22:11, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

copyright violation Xocolatl (talk) 20:43, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The collage uses non-free elements: no FoP in Russia for 3D + no sources of photos indicated Lesless (talk) 20:59, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The photos don't appear to be from Commons. But that does not necessarily rule out that they are the uploader's own work. The beaver sculpture has probably to go, though. Ru wiki says it's authors are a certain Микаэль Согоян (Mikael Sogoyan) and Ваге Согоян (Vage Sogoyan) — the latter is definitely still alive according to Ru Wiki (and I assume that the former is also alive). However, there's also a photo of this sculpture that was released under a CC-BY-SA 4.0 by a government body of Moscow... File:Бибирево парк света скульптура Бобры.jpg. Nakonana (talk) 16:15, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Questa rappresentazione artistica non esiste, si tratterebbe di una copia di Fantasia creata dal Conti Galleli e quindi non può esser minimamente utile al progetto Gasperoni96 (talk) 23:16, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is no commercial Freedom of Panorama in Ukraine. Per this website, the monument dates to 1992. Sculptor is unlikely dead for more than 70 years; as a post-1978 work with no known sculptor, this won't be restored here until 95+1 years after publication or 120+1 years from creation (based on U.S. copyright terms), whichever is shorter. U.S. terms can be ignored if Ukraine had valid commercial FoP in the first place. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 23:32, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Offensichtliche Fehllizenzierung - als Urheber wird das Unternehmen angegeben, Urheber kann aber immer nur eine natürliche Person sein Lutheraner (talk) 23:45, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Offensichtliche Fehllizenzierung - als Urheber wird das Unternehmen angegeben, Urheber kann aber immer nur eine natürliche Person sein Lutheraner (talk) 23:46, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Gegenthese: Der hochladende Benutzer User:Bemefa ist eine natürliche Person, hat selbst fotografiert und hat das Bild korrekt lizensiert. Die Namensgleichheit zum dort ansässigen Unternehmen kann zufällig sein. Einen wirklich belastbaren Löschgrund sehe ich derzeit (noch) nicht. Grüße, --Kleeblatt187 (talk) 22:50, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is no commercial Freedom of Panorama in Ukraine. The monument was unveiled in 1993 and authored by architect Распопін О. and sculptor Липівка І..

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 23:52, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Files uploaded by Preeti884488 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope: unused AI-generated images posted by a (now blocked) cross-wiki spammer.

Omphalographer (talk) 23:53, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Out of scope: unused AI-generated image, unlikely to be useful. This doesn't usefully represent fin swimming; it looks rather more like a flying person being attacked by a paper airplane! Omphalographer (talk) 23:54, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]