Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, P170!

Tip: Categorizing images

edit

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  magyar  íslenska  italiano  日本語  ქართული  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


Hello, P170!
 
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 06:17, 4 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

File tagging File:Adam Nemec1112.jpg

edit
العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Adam Nemec1112.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Sreejith K (talk) 18:51, 19 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

edit
bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Alexander-ring.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it, or if you have any questions please check my FAQ or contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 12:13, 28 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

File:Wappen-fc-bavaria-1902-kaiserslautern.png

edit
 
Wikimedia Commons does not accept fair use content.

We do this because Commons is a shared media repository. Downstream wikis have different policies based on local laws. Uses that are acceptable under US law, for example, may not be acceptable in many other countries with more restrictive rules.

In addition, fair use is not compatible with our aim as a collection of freely distributable media files.

Therefore, Commons cannot legally rely on fair use provisions.

Non-free content that may be used with reference to fair use may be uploaded locally if your project allows this.

العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  English  español  فارسی  suomi  français  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  မြန်မာဘာသာ  Nederlands  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  русский  中文  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  বাংলা   +/−

And also:

Yours sincerely, Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:21, 28 July 2018 (UTC)Reply

File:Trierische Heimat Juli-August 1932.jpg

edit

Hallo P170, schau Dir noch einmal die Datei an, dann findest Du den Text. Darf ich fragen, wofür Du das Bild verwenden willst? Gruß --Palauenc05 (talk) 15:07, 23 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Reminder

edit

Hi P170. I noticed that you've made a malformed deletion request. Here, {{Delete}} is not for speedy deletion, please see COM:DP. When you want to delete a page by manually using the {{Delete}} template (rather than the automatic Nominate for deletion tool in the Tools menu on the sidebar per COM:DR#Starting requests), you must follow the instructions in the template, including the "Click here to show further instructions" portion (or Commons:Deletion requests/Listing a request manually policy), otherwise you will create a lot of work for other people.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 14:53, 5 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Category:Reform architecture in Germany - warum entfernt?

edit

Hallo P170, warum hast Du hier und hier die Kategorie entfernt? Hast Du begründete Zweifel, dass es sich um Reformarchitektur handelt? Viele Grüße --Zinnmann (talk) 21:36, 6 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Sorry, war Quatsch. Bereits korrigiert. --P170 (talk) 17:01, 7 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

@Zinnmann: Doch kein Quatsch. Fotos sind in Kategorie, die bereits die Reformarchitekturkategorie haben. --P170 (talk) 19:02, 29 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

Oha, da hast Du natürlich recht. Vielen Dank für Deinen zweiten Blick :-) --Zinnmann (talk) 10:49, 31 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

Category:Pott's Jeans

edit

Palosirkka (talk) 14:21, 22 February 2022 (UTC)Reply


Category:Buildings in Trier by Carl Walter

edit

Palosirkka (talk) 09:11, 24 February 2022 (UTC)Reply


Category:Built in 1894 in Trier

edit

Palosirkka (talk) 09:13, 24 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Category:Built in 1905 in Trier

edit

Palosirkka (talk) 09:13, 24 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Category:Built in 1897 in Trier

edit

Palosirkka (talk) 09:13, 24 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Category:Built in 2015 in Trier

edit

Palosirkka (talk) 09:13, 24 February 2022 (UTC)Reply


Welcome, Dear Filemover!

edit

العربيَّة  Deutsch  español  English  français  português  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  русский  українська  বাংলা  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(中国大陆)‎  中文(台灣)‎  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


 

Hi P170, you're now a filemover. When moving files please respect the following advice:

  • Use the CommonsDelinker link in the {{Rename}} template to order a bot to replace all ocurrences of the old title with the new one. Or, if there was no rename-request, please use the Move & Replace-tab.
  • Please leave a redirect behind unless you have a valid reason not to do so. Other projects, including those using InstantCommons, might be using the file even though they don't show up in the global usage. Deleting the redirects would break their file references. Please see this section of the file rename guideline for more information.
  • Please know and follow the file rename guidelines.
rubin16 (talk) 12:35, 6 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

Autopatrol given

edit
 

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically marked as "reviewed". This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to make it easier for users that are monitoring Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, the Flickr upload feature and an increased number of batch-uploads in UploadWizard, uploading of freely licensed MP3 files, overwriting files uploaded by others and an increased limit for page renames per minute are now available to you. Thank you. Abzeronow (talk) 18:45, 20 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Bitte berichtigen

edit

Hallo, ich wollte gerade den Artikel Jüdemerstraße bebildern und dazu Dein Foto einfügen, sah dann aber, dass das schöne Haus in der Karl-Marx-Straße 1 steht. Würdest Du das bitte berichtigen? Viele Grüße -- Spurzem (talk) 22:38, 5 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hallo, ist erledigt. Viele Grüße P170 (talk) 07:05, 6 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

Schnee

edit

"Category:Snow in Trier", echt, jetzt! :-) Na ja, hat sich sowieso bald komplett erledigt... Cobatfor (talk)

-> ich finde ja, dass du einfach zu viele Kategorien machst. Man findet gar nix mehr, ohne sich durch x Kategorien zu klicken. Mir scheint es, wenn Du noch die Uhrzeit wüsstest, würdest Du noch Kategorien machen, zu welcher Sekunde die Fotos gemacht wurden. Ich finde das total unübersichtlich. Ich mache Unterkategorien eigentlich nur, wenn mir die Kategorie zu voll wird. Grüße Cobatfor (talk) 16:58, 15 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
"Man findet gar nix mehr, ohne sich durch x Kategorien zu klicken." -> Volle Zustimmung! Ja, ich würde auch lieber mal alle Bilder der Kategorie 19xy in Trier sehen. Aber das liegt aus meiner Sicht eindeutig an der nicht hinreichend implementierten Funktion, sich nach Wunsch bereits auf einer höheren Kategorieebene alle Medien direkt anzeigen zu lassen. Das wünsche ich mir schon lange (es gibt zwar eine solche Funktion, die aber nicht richtig funktioniert und niemand findet). Um nochmal auf den konkreten Vorwurf einzugehen: Ich lege Kategorien wie taken on JJJJ-MM-DD aus Konsistenzgründen an. Wenn es sie schon (häufig) gibt, dann hielte ich es für nicht sinnvoll, sie nach Gutdünken mal anzuwenden und mal nicht. P170 (talk) 18:41, 15 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
Da sind wir einer Meinung. Ich habe nichts gegen die Kategorien, solange ich auch was im Überblick finde. Bei einem Flugzeug, von dem von einem Modell 500 Stück gebaut wurden, muss ich teilweise dann jede Seriennummer durchgucken, wenn ich ein gutes Bild von dem Ding suche. Furchtbar. Was ist denn die geheimnisvolle Funktion, die ich nicht kenne, auch, wenn sie nicht richtig funktioniert? Danke und Grüße Cobatfor (talk) 06:39, 16 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
@Cobatfor: In einer Kategorie oben rechts ist ein Button "Gute Bilder", dort auf den Pfeil nach unten klicken und "Alle Bilder" auswählen. VG --P170 (talk) 07:19, 16 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Offizierslager Trier

edit

Übrignes gibt es beim IWM noch ein Foto Q 111325 "vermutlich aus Trier" vom Kriegsgefangenenlager [1]. Allderings weiß ich nicht, wo die Holzbaracken gestanden haben sollen, da die ja IM Palastgarten zwischen Kaiserthermen, Landesmuseum, Agnetenkaserne und der Palisade auf Foto File:Allied officers ice skating at the Trier Prisoner of War camp, Germany, in the winter of 1917-1918 (IWM Q 111313).jpg gestanden haben müssten. Da ist nirgendwo Platz. Was meinst Du?
Übrigens habe ich zu dem Lager leider nichts gefunden, außer eine Liste auf de:Wikipedia von den Lagern in Deutschland. In Emil Zenz: "Die Stadt Trier im 20. Jahrhundert" steht dazu leider nix, ebenso hier: [2]. Cobatfor (talk) 06:53, 16 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

So komplett "aus der Hüfte" meine ich, dass es solche Baracken auch mal nahe der Jägerkaserne Trier-West (Eurener Straße) gegeben hat. Ich schaue bei Gelegenheit mal, ob ich was finde. P170 (talk) 07:16, 16 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello. This message is to inform you that a daily gallery in your userspace, User:P170/NeueBilderTrier, has failed. Due to software limitations, the bot has a hard upper-limit of 2000 files per page.

This usually happens because a gallery is too broad or because the galleries need to encompass a shorter timeframe. Please review your settings and request an appropriate change to your gallery. The logs are available here.

Please make your request for removal at User talk:OgreBot/gallery within 4 days, or your the bot owner will remove the gallery altogether.

Thank you. Magog the Ogre, via OgreBot (talk) 11:49, 19 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Bilder der Bundesanstalt für Wasserbau

edit

Liebe(r) P170,

Sie haben 2022 mehrere Bilder von der Bundesanstalt für Wasserbau unter der Lizenz CC-BY-4.0 hochgeladen, wie etwa Trier bei Moselhochwasser 1955 19550117 (HB04850).jpg. Haben Sie vielleicht einen Nachweis für diese Lizenz, etwa auf einer Webseite der Bundesanstalt? Felix QW (talk) 19:22, 27 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hallo. Ja, siehe z. B. https://izw-medienarchiv.baw.de/#/detail/66795191-37b7-49dd-ba13-7c4a5416a4fc P170 (talk) 20:29, 27 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
Vielen Dank! Soweit ich sehen kann, ist die Lizenz bei jedem Bild einzeln hinterlegt. Wäre es möglich, diese Links bei den einzelnen Bildern azugeben, damit die Lizenz nachvollziehbar bleibt und verifiziert werden kann? Felix QW (talk) 20:34, 27 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
Okay. Steht jetzt auf meiner To-Do-Liste. P170 (talk) 20:36, 27 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
Perfekt! Vielen Dank dafür - mir ist bewusst, dass Ihnen das Arbeit bedeutet, aber es wäre einfach schade, wenn die Bilder irgendwann einfach mangels Nachweis gelöscht würden. Felix QW (talk) 20:37, 27 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
edit

Copyright status: File:Trier, Porta-Nigra-Platz 1962.jpg

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Trier, Porta-Nigra-Platz 1962.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 08:05, 22 September 2024 (UTC)Reply