Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2016 March 23

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Converted to fair use. — Diannaa (talk) 04:46, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Linde Hydraulics Logo.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• company logo; dubious self-work claim FASTILY 01:49, 23 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by BethNaught (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:05, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Plaque commemorating namesake of Robert L. Burns Park in Windsor Square, Los Angeles, 2015.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

• See c:COM:FOP#United States Magog the Ogre (t • c) 04:40, 23 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by BethNaught (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:05, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Yonge Street NHS plaque.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• See c:COM:FOP#Canada. Quite likely to be a 2D work by Canadian law. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 04:50, 23 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Relisted at Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2016 April 19#File:Iphone 6 screen.png. Steel1943 (talk) 21:18, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Iphone 6 screen.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

• see c:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Iphone 6 screen.png Magog the Ogre (t • c) 05:03, 23 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

"Derivative work of copyright-protected software. I do not believe that this would fall under an de-minimis exception. "

Where's the "copyright-protected software" in this image? Most of these icons are trivially generic. Safari is freely licensed by Apple and full versions of its icon are already on Commons. Andy Dingley (talk) 10:05, 23 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Relisted at Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2016 April 19#File:Ipad air 2 thin as pencil.png. Steel1943 (talk) 21:18, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ipad air 2 thin as pencil.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

• see c:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Iphone 6 screen.png Magog the Ogre (t • c) 05:03, 23 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

"Derivative work of copyright-protected software. I do not believe that this would fall under an de-minimis exception. "

Where's the "software" in this image? Those icons are so edge-on that they're beyond de minimis and into unintelligible. Andy Dingley (talk) 10:02, 23 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by BethNaught (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:05, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Instant oatmeal double time.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• See c:COM:PACKAGING. Stefan2 (talk) 10:39, 23 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by BethNaught (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:05, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Instant Oatmeal Package PRPR.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• See c:COM:PACKAGING. Stefan2 (talk) 10:41, 23 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F9 by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Khammam MC.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Source says it was taken from different news papers, but no specific source provided (copyright status) Vin09 (talk) 11:10, 23 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G7 by RHaworth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:01, 27 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Horizon Organic Fat-Free Milk 1 gallon.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Delete: the Flickr uploader appears to exclusively have copyright violation on their Flickrstream, so this image copyright is unclear. Besides which the label is a copyright image, so as a derivative work should be deleted. It's use in both current article is purely decorative and could be replaced with a simple copyright free image so will fail WP:NFCC#1 ww2censor (talk) 11:47, 23 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: I'm the one who uploaded this image. This Flickr user duped me. He's got images with other people's watermarks on them in his stream. I don't believe he owns the rights to any of them. Kendall-K1 (talk) 12:07, 23 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by BethNaught (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 14:18, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Aleppoaleppo.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Tagged as own work of uploader, but upload comment is a link to Syrian tourism website. Cloudbound (talk) 18:17, 23 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Relisted at Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2016 April 18#File:Sven Inge.jpg. Steel1943 (talk) 22:51, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sven Inge.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• While this file probably doesn't have URAA issues in light of commons:Commons:Village_pump/Copyright#More_URAA_questions..., it was pointed out in that discussion that the work in the background may be copyrighted. If it's an issue, it can probably be solved by cropping the image. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 20:37, 23 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment: In 2009, someone attributed the photo to Ture Sjolander apparently on the basis of a OTRS ticket [1], but on the source page, there is a note from 2012 by Ture Sjolander himself attributing the photo to Folke Hellberg (for the newspaper Dagens Nyheter). It is likely that the 2012 note is a correction and takes precedence over the 2009 note. If so, it could be useful to write a note in the OTRS archives mentioning the 2012 precision. Could a OTRS member please look at this? -- Asclepias (talk) 22:44, 23 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment. I have added a note to the OTRS file. -- Rrburke (talk) 12:00, 27 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• This seems to be unfree at least in the source country. In March 1976, a play was performed at a theatre in Sweden. Later in 1976, someone published music, and used a photo of people in front of the play's scenography as cover illustration for the music. The scenographer sued, and in 1981, the Swedish supreme court ruled that the cover illustration constituted a copy of the scenography and thus violated the scenographer's copyright.[2] I'd assume that the same is true about the background on this photograph: it's unfree in the source country. --Stefan2 (talk) 23:28, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F11 by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:03, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:An IAF Mi-17 drops supplies for troops in Siachen.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• The source does not own the copyrights of the image. The 'legal' info at the website says: "VS does not claim ownership of any graphical content on this website and an effort is made to ensure that the photographer is credited - usually in the alternate text of the pictures or beside the picture." —TripWire ︢ ︢ ︡ ︢ ︡ ︢ ︡ ︢ ︡ ︡ ︢ ︡  ^ʞlɐʇ 22:00, 23 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.