Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2020 November 28

< November 27	November 29 >

November 28

File:Gundel Interior.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dubious license, probable copyright violation. The only source given for the image is a deeplink, which was valid and has been archived but is now dead. I cannot find where the image was used outside of Wikipedia, but around the time that the image was uploaded, the main page of the site had a clear copyright message and no mention of a creative commons license: https://web.archive.org/web/20100831212429/http://itthon.hu/

Note: I nominated another file by the same uploader for similar reasons yesterday and a couple more last week as well as others through the proposed deletion and WP:CSD#F9 processes. ★ Bigr Tex 03:46, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Engine room watchboard (2).jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 07:36, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned image, duplicate of File:Engine room watchboard.jpg with an extra nut superimposed in the upper left corner. ★ Bigr Tex 04:18, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, redundant to other JPG file. Salavat (talk) 05:46, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete it, agree with Salavat. — WinnerWolf99 ^talk_{What did I break now?} 16:10, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Wikipedia article Taiwan shows up as 1st result of Google search calling Taiwan a country.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The rainbow microphone icon, rainbow magnifying glass icon, POI icon, sun with mountains on photograph icon, newspaper icon, and video icon are all copyrighted images property of Google Inc. --benlisquare_T•C•E 09:15, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I don't see any use that this image would have. P,TO 19104 (talk) (contribs) 17:21, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, essentially orphaned (not used in the main space) with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 05:47, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, pointless and orphaned. — WinnerWolf99 ^talk_{What did I break now?} 16:12, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, the buttons are simple shapes that are ineligible for copyright. Félix An (talk) 16:25, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Begowala images

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete -FASTILY 00:27, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned images of a town in Pakistan. None of them have any encyclopedic value given their low quality. All of the images are low resolution and in most of them the focus is unclear. P,TO 19104 (talk) (contribs) 16:56, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete all, orphaned with no obvious value. Salavat (talk) 05:50, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Usable in it's own page, but the town is rather unimportant anyway. Delete. — WinnerWolf99 ^talk_{What did I break now?} 16:15, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Colonial Parkway-entrance.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Insufficient source/license information and absent uploader so no ability to correct. If the uploader took the picture, we would need them to license the image in addition to the one for the sign. If the uploader found an image taken by a member of the National Park Service, we need a better source (I can't find one) to confirm that fact. ★ Bigr Tex 19:56, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 05:51, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, Agree with Salavat. — WinnerWolf99 ^talk_{What did I break now?} 16:25, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:GliultimigiornidiPompei.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

see c:Commons:Deletion requests/File:GliultimigiornidiPompei.jpg. This may be eligible for fair use, though. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 21:34, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Photograph of Delphi Double-Murder Suspect.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree file. The declared source has the caption "Investigators have released an updated voice recording and video of the suspect not previously released that was extracted from slain 14-year-old Liberty German’s cell phone".[1] This indicates that this is not a work of an FBI employee. We should assume that the copyright belongs to Liberty German's family. Verbcatcher (talk) 22:25, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know anything about all that stuff, but THE QUALITY IS TERRIBLE!! — WinnerWolf99 ^talk_{What did I break now?} 16:30, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:PS145 Students Perform Macbeth.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Photo was seemingly taken by the uploader on behalf of Stages of Learning, an organization that has gone defunct. The uploader claims that "Stages of Learning dissolved in 2010 and its intellectual property is now in the public domain." I don't believe this is true (see orphan work). Nonetheless, it's possible that the uploader retains copyright and has the authority to release these works into the public domain. Wikiacc (¶) 22:37, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete all, essentially orphaned (not used in the main space) with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 05:54, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Salavat: the licensing situation has improved. Would this be enough for you to strike your delete vote? Wikiacc (¶) 02:55, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like you are happy with the OTRS confirmation so yep happy to strike it out. Salavat (talk) 03:47, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. Uploader has produced this document, stating that he "is authorized to enter into any and all agreements to make use of Stages of Learning intellectual property now and in perpetuity at his discretion utilizing the Stages of Learning name and/or logo." This, to me, suggests authority to release the works into public domain (or at least a free license). Wikiacc (¶) 02:08, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep all as nominator; licensing has been changed to a free license, confirmed by OTRS. Wikiacc (¶) 02:55, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.