Jump to content

Wikipedia:Copyright problems/2011 May 13

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Suspected copyright violations (CorenSearchBot reports)

SCV for 2011-05-13 Edit

  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. I think it's okay; one lingering sentence that I felt was derivative, but most of this is a chronological recounting of his life, so structure is not an issue, and there is sufficient change in language and detail. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 18:44, 22 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Issues addressed (in current userspace draft) as a result of discussion. --Trevj (talk) 09:54, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Yes it is valid, we accept CC-BY-SA 3.0 and CC-BY 2.5 content can be relicensed as CC-BY-SA 3.0 (although not the other way). Stifle (talk) 10:29, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Copyright investigations (manual article tagging)
[edit]
  • This article is copied and pasted from several different sources, chiefly public domain California sites. One site I am curious about is http://www.wbdg.org/resources/cwmgmt.php as the author is a U.S. Army Corp employee. Because it is the work of a U.S. federal employee, does that make it public domain? The article creator is re-writing the article at a temp page. See the article's talk.--NortyNort (Holla) 09:52, 21 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • First, addressing the meta question: only if it was written in the course of his duties. Federal employees are not prohibited from holding copyright in content they create on their own time, even if it relates to their area of expertise. They are not then acting as agents of the government. See [1]. Off to look at the issues. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 16:50, 22 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Yea, it looks like you had a hard time with that one. Thanks for the explanation. I am guessing he didn't write it in the course of his duties. Otherwise, the Army Corps would've published it first and it would've been courtesy of.--NortyNort (Holla) 09:26, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]