Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Coptic Orthox Church
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was DELETE. I'm not convinced this is useful as a redirect, so someone else can create it if they like. -Splashtalk 00:46, 8 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I'm pretty sure this is talking about the Coptic Church, but this is a rant (and "advertising") and the proper info is elsewhere. Delete. Grandmasterka 01:36, 2 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete preaching bordering on nonsense. Ruby 01:39, 2 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as per nom. Dustimagic *\o/* (talk/contribs) *\o/* 01:51, 2 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Nothing to merge, and it is an unlikely misspelling. Youngamerican 01:57, 2 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, reasons stated above. -Ikkyu2 02:55, 2 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. At the very least due to W:NPOV Akerensky99 05:33, 2 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Severely incoherent (to English eyes/ears) -- delete unless cleaned up and verified as not being a misspelling -- Simon Cursitor 08:33, 2 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as per all of the above, I've just checked with a Coptic friend of mine and this definitely is a misspelling. Sounds funny, though - orthox... Muhamedmesic 12:52, 2 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete this POV screed and redirect to Coptic Church to discourage re-creation. TMS63112 18:56, 2 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete and redirect per TMS63112. Orthox --- gets your sins whiter! Smerdis of Tlön 19:29, 2 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to Coptic Church. Please tell me this was an intentional mispelling? Cyde Weys 05:54, 3 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete and Redirect as per all. --Terence Ong (恭喜发财) 10:30, 3 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. --Latinus (talk (el:)) 17:29, 3 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Not sure whether redirect has any use. Pavel Vozenilek 22:20, 4 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.