Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Modesty Blaise Quarterly

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Modesty Blaise. Randykitty (talk) 11:34, 16 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Modesty Blaise Quarterly

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article about a series of comic book reprints (unsourced for at least a decade). Google search suggests the subject fails WP:GNG and WP:NB. — MarkH21 (talk) 05:29, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. — MarkH21 (talk) 05:30, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 05:37, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Merge Why not merge to Modesty Blaise? The table in this article, and other tables in the Modesty Blaise article, could be made collapsible if the page is thought too long. RebeccaGreen (talk) 14:46, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Randykitty (talk) 15:51, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Merge (change as nominator): Agree with RebeccaGreen’s point above. The reprints section of the Modesty Blaise article would be be perfectly suitable for this. — MarkH21 (talk) 18:40, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 05:50, 9 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Merge - seems very clear to me it should go in the reprints section of the Modesty Blaise article since it exists. Meszzy² (talk) 06:10, 9 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Merge with Modesty Blaise per RebeccaGreen, Meszzy². Mosaicberry (talk) 13:08, 9 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Merge - as per the arguments above. Dunarc (talk) 20:42, 9 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Merge Article about reprints should go into existing section about reprints in main article. Definitely recommend making the table collapsible though; the Modesty Blaise page already has a lot of long tables. Userqio (talk) 00:38, 10 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.