Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Melancholie der Engel

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Nominator withdrew nomination with no support for deletion (non-admin closure). ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 13:25, 14 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Melancholie der Engel

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I tried to clean this one up and find sources, but I can't find where this film has really received coverage in any reliable sources. There are some blog hits, but not much else. I did remove two reviews from the page, but neither of them were from places that we'd consider to be a RS. It did win an award, but not one that is so overwhelmingly notable that we'd keep on that basis alone. If anyone can find some sources for this I'd be much obliged. Now something to note is that while the article had previously been at The Angels' Melancholy, all the film has predominantly used the German title even when it has been released in various English speaking markets. I couldn't really find anything under either title, though. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 05:56, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I do note where this looks to have been created by a sock of User:ThatFilmGuy92, and I suppose I can speedy this under that, but given that it did win one award I'd like to at least give it a little while for others to find sources I may have missed. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 05:58, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:54, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:54, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Keep as the thing appears to have coverage in such as Quiet Earth Bloody-Disgusting OFDB and a few other places. Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 13:53, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 02:28, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 00:25, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Withdrawing: The coverage is very light but the award and review are good enough for me. Thanks everyone! Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 11:18, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.