Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Meatwad (2nd nomination)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete and redirect to Aqua Teen Hunger Force. Apparently per Wikipedia:Notability (fiction) we do not have any notability criteria for individual characters from works of fiction, so the general notability guideline has to apply - and none of the keeps have shown evidence that it does, the parent series being does not make individual characters notable. And the claim in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Meatwad that the deletes are all referencing is that the general notability guideline is not met. So delete it is. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 07:17, 2 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Meatwad (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Was turned into a redirect as the result of an AfD back in 2011, and nothing has changed since back then. Should be a redirect, but you have an editor who doesn't agree with the prior AfD insisting on re-creating the article. So the article should now be deleted, and then a redirect created to prevent spurious re-creation in the future. Onel5969 TT me 17:29, 24 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Redirect - Solely in-universe perspective both here and in coverage. Fictional elements need to have some coverage outside of their universe to be notable enough for a stand-alone article, i.e. information about the individual character’s development and design, or critical reception to the character, reliably sourced and independent of the subject (WP:GOLDENRULE). Red Phoenix talk 18:31, 24 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 18:32, 24 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 18:32, 24 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 18:32, 24 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New Jersey-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 18:33, 24 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 18:33, 24 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.