Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Martviri Sabatsmindeli

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. postdlf (talk) 01:32, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Martviri Sabatsmindeli

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I cannot find any verifiable sources that prove this person's notability. Jeremy112233 (talk) 21:13, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Sources are in Georgian. And just because they are Georgian sources it does not mean it should be deleted. There are many articles just like that with Chinese, Japanese, Russian, Arabic sources so should we remove and delete all those articles which has one? georgianJORJADZE 21:17, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Georgia (country)-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:09, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:10, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:11, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:11, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: My gut feel is that that the subject is notable, but the titles of sources should be translated into English, or at the very least transliterated into Latin script. St Anselm (talk) 23:22, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

That's my main concern as well. Jeremy112233 (talk) 23:27, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, assuming good faith on the (recently translated) references in the article. St Anselm (talk) 11:07, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. There's no requirement that sources must be in English. I did run the sources through Google Translate and I learned two things: 1) Google Translate for Georgian needs some work. 2) What parts of it I could read gave me the distinct impression that this subject is notable. -- ShinmaWa^(talk) 07:41, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- The fact that the sources are in Georgian is no reason for deletion. I cannot read them, but have no reason to suspect that they are not WP:RS. Peterkingiron (talk) 16:35, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

So can I remove the delete tag from the article? georgianJORJADZE 13:29, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

No, you must wait until this discussion is closed, which will be seven days from the nomination. St Anselm (talk) 13:46, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.