Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Indian Institute of Technology Muddenahalli
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Tone 19:59, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Indian Institute of Technology Muddenahalli (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Delete. This institute does not exist, and per WP:CRYSTAL so shouldn't the article. The cited undated articles are in fact from 2009: here and here are articles with dates, discussing the statement by Veerappa Moily, and verifying the date in which it occurred. Since then, the institute is still merely a proposal. here is a year old report that says again that "Mr. Moily had recently stated that there is a proposal to establish an IIT at Muddenahalli" (my emphasis). I can find no evidence that this was approved, nor that 200 acres were set for it - the news reports discuss 200 acres set for VIAT. Muhandes (talk) 17:26, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 17:44, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:47, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - per nom - institution doesnt exist so neither should the article. Fmph (talk) 19:49, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.