Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abdullah Syed

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 08:34, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Abdullah Syed (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Another non-notable Minor League Cricket player. Like similar articles created by this user, there is an erroneous claim that the player has played in matches that held List A and Twenty20 status; as with others they have created, this simply isn't the case. The matches in the ICC World Cricket League Division 4 fail the revised WP:NCRIC guidelines too. StickyWicket (talk) 19:37, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. StickyWicket (talk) 19:37, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Cricket-related deletion discussions. StickyWicket (talk) 19:37, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. As I've said before in a similar Afd, there are way too many misinformations in the articles, with the sources mentioning none of the claims made. Human (talk) 20:15, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:40, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:40, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete fails WP:GNG and hasn't played in a notable enough match either. Joseph2302 (talk) 09:01, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Per nom and Joseph2302's comments, fails cricket guidelines (even before they were tightened), and there's nothing to suggest a GNG pass. Rugbyfan22 (talk) 21:52, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per above, fail Notability. Dam222 🌋 (talk) 13:58, 3 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete No notability as per the guidelines, fails gng. Timetraveller80 (talk) 18:26, 3 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Per nom  Hamza Ali Shah  ^Talk 20:37, 3 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Per nom. fails WP:GNG, Alex-h (talk) 16:36, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete fails WP:GNG and WP:NCRIC.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 02:37, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.