Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/5ive Po1nts

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete--JForget 23:27, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

5ive Po1nts (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Contested prod (and prod2). Original prod concern: "Non-notable fashion brand started by a high-schooler, with no evidence of existing outside some drawings. No Google hits. Elements of auto-biography slip in when article refers to subject as "i". When there is some evidence that the clothes exist, are sold in specialty stores and that "many celebrities" wear them, no problem with re-creation." Kateshortforbob 11:05, 24 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment Jordan C. Johnson should also be added to this AfD ChrisTheDude 11:19, 24 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete No sources available, 5 total hits on Google, none appear relevant to the issue. Yngvarr (t) (c) 11:23, 24 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete It's a newly established fashion brand that hasn't made it big that it received mention by reliable sources and such. Literally something made up in school one day in 2007. Should have waited until it really hits a major breakthrough or somewhat before it starts the article again. Considering this article and the article on Jordan Johnson are created by the same user User:Billionare09, there may be a conflict of interest with respect to the articles.--Alasdair 11:32, 24 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • And one more thing: The article on Jordan C. Johnson isn't exactly verifiable either. It's going a bit too far in predicting his graduation date (in 2009), saying as if it had happened.--Alasdair 11:36, 24 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. Q ^{T C} 12:28, 24 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. No sources, no evidence of notability, obvious vanity entry. I've proposed deletion of Jordan C. Johnson. Powers ^T 12:55, 24 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • The prod was contested; I've nominated it for deletion. Powers ^T 18:02, 24 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Strong delete. WP:NFT, WP:OR, WP:V, need I go on? CRGreathouse (t | c) 13:25, 24 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Suspected hoax. If it's famous for celebrity usage, you'd think it would have some kind of google presence. --Moonriddengirl 13:45, 24 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Google results: 1 - 4 of 4 for 5ive Po1nts. One of those is to Wikipedia regarding this AfD, one is for a German Christian band, and two are from forums, not WP:RS. No verifiable results for "Jordan C. Johnson". Claim "The line is sold in upscale specialty stores." is not verifiable, and if it were true, certainly there would be Google results to back that up. Additionally, the Jordan C. Johnson article is basically "telling the future" (WP:NOT#CRYSTAL applies to both of these articles). ^Ariel♥Gold 15:58, 24 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per all above. - Mtmelendez ^{(Talk|UB|Home)} 21:21, 24 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment The AFD notice was removed from the article yesterday; I reverted this morning. I don't know if this affects the discussion. --Kateshortforbob 08:46, 25 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • It doesn't. But I did see that the IP address who removed it has also previously contributed to the article, so watch the article page in case it happens again. - Mtmelendez ^{(Talk|UB|Home)} 10:38, 25 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.