Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1982 in motoring

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. John254 03:04, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

1982 in motoring

procedural nomination Nominated for WP:PROD deletion in Nov 2006, then again 20 Sept 2007. PROD nominator states: "Too vauge for an individual article, fails WP:NOR, unsourced as well". I personally do not agree with the 'too vague' notion, but the format is distinctly different from other "year in XXX"-type articles. Likely the best outcome would be to reformat to something like 1998 in architecture or 1998 in art and source line items. User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 23:27, 23 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletions. —User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 23:29, 23 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and discuss format on the talk page or start a project. this is not the place. DGG (talk) 02:44, 24 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. The article needs improvement, specially for Global coverage but is a good basis. Malcolma 09:15, 24 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep good potental. -Icewedge 18:36, 24 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Needs relaible sources but has great potential and considering what the article is talking about cannot see that it could possibly be considered unverifiable. Davewild 19:16, 24 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep This could be seen as a relevant article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.169.203.196 (talk)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.