User talk:Shenandoahjoanne

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. DMacks (talk) 02:12, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Shenandoahjoanne (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

UTRS appeal #16255 was submitted on Aug 01, 2016 02:23:56. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 02:23, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Blocking admin here...User:Joanne Shenandoah has asserted to be Joanne Shenandoah. I blocked this new one here because its COI-like edit and username match compared to the other (older) one suggested it was a sock situation. If so, one account is the way to go--I softblocked here and left the older one unblocked. If the accounts are actually unrelated, then one or the other is actually misrepresenting itself as actually being the subject (both by on-wiki or UTRS claim, and by username). I don't have access to the UTRS ticket to decipher further. DMacks (talk) 06:18, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'm the UTRS responder - she's representing herself in the appeal as this person also. I sent it to the CU queue. Katie^talk 12:31, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Probably just barely missed the CU timeframe:( Assuming so, I would be fine indeffing that account and unblocking this one here, based on "both claim to be the same person, so cannot have two accounts; keep the one with better evidence of identity", and a strong COI warning. DMacks (talk) 13:15, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@DMacks: And that's the case - Ponyo says it's stale. I'm good with your solution – do you want to do it or should I? Katie^talk 13:21, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Katie: I switched the blocks around. But I don't have UTRS access and am not up on its processes...could you handle closing the request or whatever else for an accepted appeal? DMacks (talk) 04:14, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@DMacks: The appeal has been closed with a COI warning. Shenandoahjoanne, please take the email I sent you to heart and do not create more accounts with which to edit. Katie^talk 13:56, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]