Jump to content

Talk:Evolution Tower

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 22:58, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Question?

[edit]

Is the building earth quake proof? 208.102.114.178 (talk) 03:01, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, this issue is already 2 years old, but... Obviously, 90% of such buildings are resistant to earthquakes. Specifically, this (and Moscow City in general) can withstand a 7-point earthquake. By the way, the strongest po in Russia in 1970 reached only 6 5.142.42.153 (talk) 19:10, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

!UNST

[edit]

THE FIRST THING THAT IS AMAZING FOR REST ROOM! YOU KNOW HOW YOU ARE YOU HAVE👍 YOU HAVE THE RIGHT THINGS THAT YOU ARE AWESOME ABOUT AND HOW YOU FEEL ABOUT IT — Preceding unsigned comment added by 110.44.96.180 (talk) 14:02, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This comment looks like broken English; I wonder what it means? Appletonclack (talk) 14:30, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Active voice for passive error?

[edit]

Is this a translation from another language? Article says, "In 2016, Snegiri claimed that Snapbox had unjustly enriched for US$127 million, ...." Does this require the insertion of "been" with this result: "In 2016, Snegiri claimed that Snapbox had been unjustly enriched for US$127 million,..."? (Appletonclack (talk) 14:28, 10 September 2024 (UTC))[reply]

It appears that the uncertain "would be" should be changed to a definite statement

[edit]

Article says, "Space of the Evolution Tower would be utilized primarily for office purposes but there would also be shopping galleries, boutiques, restaurants, cafes, a supermarket and banquet halls." This statement is footnoted to 2018. Are not the purposes of the tower established by now? Should "would be" be changed to "have been"?(Appletonclack (talk) 14:34, 10 September 2024 (UTC))[reply]