User contributions for 90.216.244.17

11:5611:56, 28 November 2015 diff hist 0‎ Constitution of the United Kingdom ‎ The individual who created the reference gave an incorrect date of the case... said 1982 when infact it was 1983
05:2105:21, 28 November 2015 diff hist −1‎ Constitution of the United Kingdom ‎ I used lateral to best describe the case... unless anyone else can find a better word here.
05:1705:17, 28 November 2015 diff hist +6‎ Constitution of the United Kingdom ‎ Copying from the source didn't fit well with the sentence... I believe this solves the issue
05:1405:14, 28 November 2015 diff hist +7‎ Constitution of the United Kingdom ‎ Reworded from "principle" to cardinal doctrine as cited in first paragraph's source to avoid confusion with the sentence behind this.
04:3404:34, 28 November 2015 diff hist −2‎ Constitution of the United Kingdom ‎ Removed double full stops.
04:3304:33, 28 November 2015 diff hist −11‎ Constitution of the United Kingdom ‎ Removed the bracket section. - Still looking for a conjoining.
04:2904:29, 28 November 2015 diff hist +346‎ Constitution of the United Kingdom ‎ I copied the text from that source... to perhaps be simplified.
04:2504:25, 28 November 2015 diff hist +23‎ Constitution of the United Kingdom ‎ Still within rewording.
04:2204:22, 28 November 2015 diff hist +18‎ Constitution of the United Kingdom ‎ reworded better.
04:2104:21, 28 November 2015 diff hist −127‎ Constitution of the United Kingdom ‎ I separated sources to avoid any misconception of an inference being made here since the wording was the issue, The case showed from the other source the court a left the case undecided. Despite this source is dead-linked. Principle source removed as OR
03:4703:47, 28 November 2015 diff hist +12‎ Constitution of the United Kingdom ‎ reverted back to "the" but added "legislative" which is more coherent with the source.
03:4503:45, 28 November 2015 diff hist 0‎ Constitution of the United Kingdom ‎ many characteristics... "a cardinal one being"... So I changed the beginning of the sentence from "the" to "one"... perhaps some work is still needed also.
03:1303:13, 28 November 2015 diff hist +164‎ Constitution of the United Kingdom ‎ Out of context... still remains dubious since monachy's overthrew a monarchy here... I'm adding the full context and leaving "dubious"
03:0503:05, 28 November 2015 diff hist +5‎ Constitution of the United Kingdom ‎ Moved the source that gives an example of the case where the courts abstained from making the decision and added better wording.
02:4502:45, 28 November 2015 diff hist +37‎ Constitution of the United Kingdom ‎ "may not" is the same as "may"... I studied contract law. There must be "must not" than "may not" I wasn't sure how to amend this but there is still some work here to be done. The other source shows the court didn't choose... contrary too.

04:5704:57, 27 November 2015 diff hist +1,513‎ Talk:Constitution of the United Kingdom ‎ →The foundational structure of the article is not backed up at all... the claimed Parliamentary Sovereignty has no source to back itself up. We need a complete fair restructure.
04:1204:12, 27 November 2015 diff hist +20‎ Talk:Constitution of the United Kingdom ‎ →The foundational structure of the article is not backed up at all... the claimed Parliamentary Sovereignty has no source to back itself up. We need a complete fair restructure.
04:1004:10, 27 November 2015 diff hist +5‎ Talk:Constitution of the United Kingdom ‎ →The foundational structure of the article is not backed up at all... the claimed Parliamentary Sovereignty has no source to back itself up. We need a complete fair restructure.
04:0404:04, 27 November 2015 diff hist +122‎ Talk:Constitution of the United Kingdom ‎ →The foundational structure of the article is not backed up at all... the claimed Parliamentary Sovereignty has no source to back itself up. We need a complete fair restructure.
04:0104:01, 27 November 2015 diff hist +1,987‎ Talk:Constitution of the United Kingdom ‎ →The foundational structure of the article is not backed up at all... the claimed Parliamentary Sovereignty has no source to back itself up. We need a complete fair restructure.: new section
02:5402:54, 27 November 2015 diff hist 0‎ Constitution of the United Kingdom ‎ Moving the full stop
02:5202:52, 27 November 2015 diff hist +19‎ Constitution of the United Kingdom ‎ Inferences are original research
02:4702:47, 27 November 2015 diff hist +12‎ Constitution of the United Kingdom ‎ The claim stands contrary to the source... M vs AG – the court stated "obiter" (making it clear that they were not purporting to decide the issue) www.thestudentroom.co.uk/attachment.php?attachmentid=89073

23:0723:07, 26 November 2015 diff hist +399‎ Talk:Constitution of the United Kingdom ‎ →United Kingdom article - Bill of Rights 1689 — secures parliamentary supremacy over the monarch, the result of the Glorious Revolution - dubious... please discuss
22:5322:53, 26 November 2015 diff hist +42‎ Constitution of the United Kingdom ‎ Undid revision 692573525 by JRPG (talk) Wikipedia:Neutral point of view - follow the rules. - You're arbitrating a bias by remotely suggesting that.
16:2216:22, 26 November 2015 diff hist +34‎ Talk:Constitution of the United Kingdom ‎ →United Kingdom article - Bill of Rights 1689 — secures parliamentary supremacy over the monarch, the result of the Glorious Revolution - dubious... please discuss
16:2016:20, 26 November 2015 diff hist +62‎ Talk:Constitution of the United Kingdom ‎ →United Kingdom article - Bill of Rights 1689 — secures parliamentary supremacy over the monarch, the result of the Glorious Revolution - dubious... please discuss
16:1716:17, 26 November 2015 diff hist +1,913‎ Talk:Constitution of the United Kingdom ‎ →United Kingdom article
15:3115:31, 26 November 2015 diff hist +31‎ Constitution of the United Kingdom ‎ →History: The bill of rights doesn't state this at all if read properly, if anything it insists on equal status, parliament must obtain consent from the monarchy and vise versa. Also parliament is unable to prevent a re-election of a monarchy. dispute
14:4814:48, 26 November 2015 diff hist +1‎ Infallibility ‎ →In philosophy
14:3414:34, 26 November 2015 diff hist +22‎ Infallibility ‎ →In philosophy
14:1614:16, 26 November 2015 diff hist −11‎ Infallibility ‎ →In philosophy
14:0014:00, 26 November 2015 diff hist +1‎ Infallibility ‎No edit summary
13:5913:59, 26 November 2015 diff hist +9‎ Infallibility ‎No edit summary
13:5413:54, 26 November 2015 diff hist +1‎ Constitution of the United Kingdom ‎ added a comma
13:3213:32, 26 November 2015 diff hist −6‎ Infallibility ‎ →In philosophy: refined
13:1913:19, 26 November 2015 diff hist +2‎ Constitution of the United Kingdom ‎ oops
13:1713:17, 26 November 2015 diff hist +9‎ Constitution of the United Kingdom ‎ described alone summaries no doubt is in question... so I added a keyword "reportly" that gives some hesitence in the sense that opinions may differ... and who's to say it's not susceptical to change in a thousand years as the constitution does shift.
13:1113:11, 26 November 2015 diff hist +25‎ Infallibility ‎ →In philosophy
12:4312:43, 26 November 2015 diff hist −1‎ Infallibility ‎ →In philosophy
12:3812:38, 26 November 2015 diff hist +12‎ Infallibility ‎ →In philosophy: Sentence improvement
12:0612:06, 26 November 2015 diff hist −14‎ Constitution of the United Kingdom ‎ Belongs here
12:0312:03, 26 November 2015 diff hist +10‎ Constitution of the United Kingdom ‎ Wikipedia:Neutral point of view - No republican perspective is given within the whole article and the current framework leers an editorial bias.
11:5311:53, 26 November 2015 diff hist −30‎ Parliamentary sovereignty ‎ →England and UK generally
11:4611:46, 26 November 2015 diff hist −56‎ Parliamentary sovereignty ‎ →England and UK generally
11:4511:45, 26 November 2015 diff hist −1‎ Parliamentary sovereignty ‎ →England and UK generally
11:4411:44, 26 November 2015 diff hist +87‎ Parliamentary sovereignty ‎ →England and UK generally
11:1811:18, 26 November 2015 diff hist +235‎ Infallibility ‎ →In philosophy: More detailed description into the philosophy and I'm convinced the last edit wasn't literate with also a [dubious] next to it. Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit

28 November 2015

27 November 2015

26 November 2015