User contributions for 86.17.152.168
Appearance
Results for 86.17.152.168 talk block log logs global block log filter log
22 July 2015
- 13:0613:06, 22 July 2015 diff hist +340 Talk:Edgington v Fitzmaurice If there is no response, then I might fix it myself, I suppose . . . . . .
25 June 2015
26 May 2015
- 01:1101:11, 26 May 2015 diff hist +2 Quintinshill rail disaster http://www.railwaysarchive.co.uk/documents/BoT_Quin1915.pdf
- 00:1700:17, 26 May 2015 diff hist −25 Quintinshill rail disaster http://www.railwaysarchive.co.uk/documents/BoT_Quin1915.pdf
- 00:1300:13, 26 May 2015 diff hist +222 Quintinshill rail disaster http://www.railwaysarchive.co.uk/documents/BoT_Quin1915.pdf (perhaps this is already referenced?) Tag: extraneous markup
25 May 2015
- 11:0411:04, 25 May 2015 diff hist 0 Quintinshill rail disaster The collisions at Quintinshill were clearly a disaster; looking at causes as fully as possible increases the chances of future prevention (IMHO)
- 10:5910:59, 25 May 2015 diff hist +904 Talk:Quintinshill rail disaster →I changed my mind about being content, as it is indisputable (very brave) that Lt.Col Druitt's choice of words should be reflected in the article (collision v. accident): new section
- 10:3610:36, 25 May 2015 diff hist +4 Talk:Quintinshill rail disaster →This is the 100th anniversary - let us look at the accident more objectively. 'Cause' is typically multi-layered, and multi-factorial.
- 10:3210:32, 25 May 2015 diff hist +1,914 Talk:Quintinshill rail disaster →This is the 100th anniversary - let us look at the accident more objectively. 'Cause' is typically multi-layered, and multi-factorial.
22 May 2015
- 03:2903:29, 22 May 2015 diff hist +1,060 Talk:Quintinshill rail disaster →This is the 100th anniversary - let us look at the accident more objectively. 'Cause' is typically multi-layered, and multi-factorial.: new section
- 03:1003:10, 22 May 2015 diff hist +189 Quintinshill rail disaster Not appropriate to take such a simplistic view of 'cause' - this is not a newspaper article!
17 May 2015
- 04:4504:45, 17 May 2015 diff hist +98 Hip replacement why mention "runner-up" when he has won eight?
16 May 2015
- 11:1111:11, 16 May 2015 diff hist +1,360 Talk:Scottish independence →Wording in History Section: Misleading = Yes, but confusing = No
27 March 2015
- 06:2606:26, 27 March 2015 diff hist +635 Talk:Demographics of India →Very interesting article: new section
- 06:1806:18, 27 March 2015 diff hist +8 Demographics of India "inclusive" does not make sense semantically or gramatically (unless there is a particular usage in India?)
22 February 2015
- 14:4414:44, 22 February 2015 diff hist +717 User talk:Drchriswilliams →Message for Chris (re EE) ~ Alasdair writing: new section
- 14:3314:33, 22 February 2015 diff hist 0 Employee engagement I had a spare semi-colon, so I slipped it in to add some variety to the sentence lengths
- 14:3114:31, 22 February 2015 diff hist 0 Employee engagement "lexicon" is the right word; "armoury" was just plain wrong (sometimes you mislay words when you need them, I guess)
- 14:2814:28, 22 February 2015 diff hist +1,058 Talk:Employee engagement →Article lead
- 14:1314:13, 22 February 2015 diff hist +1,150 Talk:Employee engagement →Please don't be lazy, DrChris . . . .
- 13:5113:51, 22 February 2015 diff hist +1,668 Talk:Employee engagement →Article lead
- 13:2113:21, 22 February 2015 diff hist +154 Employee engagement Who is the target audience: people who are familiar (or unfamiliar) with the term?
- 13:1213:12, 22 February 2015 diff hist +1,711 Talk:Employee engagement →Please don't be lazy, DrChris . . . .: new section
- 12:1212:12, 22 February 2015 diff hist +1,573 Talk:Employee engagement Interesting debate about the accuracy of the article's intro
- 11:4011:40, 22 February 2015 diff hist +182 Employee engagement Andrew doesn't think the intro needs improving, whereas I do. Perhaps someone else should distil an intro from the article?
21 February 2015
- 17:1817:18, 21 February 2015 diff hist +1,374 Talk:Employee engagement →Elevating EE to a 'property of the relationship' is tending toward original research (salted by some POV perhaps) . . .
- 16:4616:46, 21 February 2015 diff hist −4 Employee engagement ????
- 16:4616:46, 21 February 2015 diff hist +304 Employee engagement Striving for an improvement to the intro. on this important topic (see Talk)
13 February 2015
- 12:3112:31, 13 February 2015 diff hist +707 Talk:Employee engagement →Elevating EE to a 'property of the relationship' is tending toward original research (salted by some POV perhaps) . . .
- 12:1412:14, 13 February 2015 diff hist +63 Talk:Employee engagement →Elevating EE to a 'property of the relationship' is tending toward original research . . .
12 February 2015
- 18:4918:49, 12 February 2015 diff hist +1,527 Talk:Employee engagement →Elevating EE to a 'property of the relationship' is tending toward original research . . .: new section
- 18:0418:04, 12 February 2015 diff hist +108 Employee engagement I fully agree that 'emergent property' was wrong (even tho' it was my edit) but looking at Reissner and Pagan (2013) the locus of EE is still being vigorously debated.
1 January 2015
- 12:1512:15, 1 January 2015 diff hist +41 The First Time Ever I Saw Your Face (disambiguation) He WAS a folk musician (a leader in the 'folk revival' many people would say), but that doesn't make this song a folk song, does it?
15 December 2014
- 12:5512:55, 15 December 2014 diff hist −919 Synergy Making bread is NOT a good example of synergy, and this undermines the rest of the previous text.
- 11:1711:17, 15 December 2014 diff hist +637 Talk:Randomness →Is randomness a technical term? If it is, does it use differ between Maths and Physics? The only valuable stuff in this article is in the talk pages - please, someone, put it down and start again (assuming there is consensus that it is a term): new
14 December 2014
- 18:1018:10, 14 December 2014 diff hist +929 Talk:Social complexity →Title is not very helpful: new section
- 17:1217:12, 14 December 2014 diff hist +2 Talk:Complexity →Is there really a distinct CONCEPT that has the simple one-word label: "complexity"
- 17:1117:11, 14 December 2014 diff hist +1,593 Talk:Complexity →Is there really a distinct CONCEPT that has the simple one-word label: "complexity"
11 December 2014
- 12:5512:55, 11 December 2014 diff hist +765 Talk:Complexity →Is there really a distinct CONCEPT that has the simple one-word label: "complexity"
- 10:3110:31, 11 December 2014 diff hist +358 Complex No edit summary
- 10:2110:21, 11 December 2014 diff hist +9 Complexity No edit summary
- 09:3709:37, 11 December 2014 diff hist +829 Talk:Complexity →Is there really a distinct CONCEPT that has the simple one-word label: "complexity": new section
7 September 2014
- 14:3514:35, 7 September 2014 diff hist −28 Talk:Motivation →Replaced Intro
- 14:3314:33, 7 September 2014 diff hist +57 Motivation having trouble with the citation . . . . (motivation to succeed is running out for just now)
- 14:2814:28, 7 September 2014 diff hist −2 Motivation →References
- 14:2714:27, 7 September 2014 diff hist +171 Motivation →References Tag: reference list removal
- 14:2414:24, 7 September 2014 diff hist +1,710 Talk:Motivation →Replaced Intro: new section
- 14:0614:06, 7 September 2014 diff hist +11 Motivation No edit summary
- 14:0514:05, 7 September 2014 diff hist +28 Motivation Given how much detail is included later, it is important to highlight the nature of the concept
24 July 2014
- 14:2414:24, 24 July 2014 diff hist +141 Talk:Badminton at the 2014 Commonwealth Games – Mixed team No edit summary