User contributions for 130.88.123.167

10 May 2016

• 16:4616:46, 10 May 2016 diff hist −6‎ Prime avoidance ‎ ←Redirected page to Prime avoidance lemma

4 April 2016

• 20:0820:08, 4 April 2016 diff hist +91‎ Specialization (pre)order ‎ →Topologies on orders
• 20:0720:07, 4 April 2016 diff hist +6‎ Specialization (pre)order ‎ →Topologies on orders: same
• 20:0720:07, 4 April 2016 diff hist +6‎ Specialization (pre)order ‎ →Topologies on orders: pretty important qualification there........

10 March 2016

• 17:0017:00, 10 March 2016 diff hist +1‎ Regular ideal ‎No edit summary

24 January 2016

• 05:2805:28, 24 January 2016 diff hist −3‎ A Weekend in the City ‎ ooof, that wasn't grammatical, was it :s
• 05:2605:26, 24 January 2016 diff hist −46‎ A Weekend in the City ‎ Suggested clean-up of first two paragraphs
• 05:0905:09, 24 January 2016 diff hist +487‎ Talk:A Weekend in the City ‎ →Claims in the introduction - don't seem to be backed up in the main text
• 03:5303:53, 24 January 2016 diff hist +120‎ Talk:A Weekend in the City ‎ →Claims in the introduction - don't seem to be backed up in the main text
• 03:5103:51, 24 January 2016 diff hist +224‎ Talk:A Weekend in the City ‎ →Claims in the introduction - don't seem to be backed up in the main text
• 03:4003:40, 24 January 2016 diff hist −1‎ Talk:A Weekend in the City ‎ →Claims in the introduction - don't seem to be backed up in the main text
• 03:3903:39, 24 January 2016 diff hist +321‎ Talk:A Weekend in the City ‎ →Claims in the introduction - don't seem to be backed up in the main text
• 03:3703:37, 24 January 2016 diff hist +181‎ Talk:A Weekend in the City ‎ →Claims in the introduction - don't seem to be backed up in the main text
• 03:2903:29, 24 January 2016 diff hist +61‎ A Weekend in the City ‎ Unreferenced claims as per talk page
• 03:2303:23, 24 January 2016 diff hist +236‎ User talk:Materialscientist ‎ →Thanks!: new section
• 03:1903:19, 24 January 2016 diff hist +15‎ Vladimir Komarov ‎No edit summary
• 03:1603:16, 24 January 2016 diff hist +57‎ A Weekend in the City ‎No edit summary
• 03:0803:08, 24 January 2016 diff hist −100‎ Talk:A Weekend in the City ‎ →Claims in the introduction - don't seem to be backed up in the main text: I guess that's just how Wikipedia works! Getting used to it!
• 03:0603:06, 24 January 2016 diff hist +4‎ A Weekend in the City ‎ →Lyrics
• 03:0303:03, 24 January 2016 diff hist +17‎ 2006 Chick-fil-A Bowl ‎No edit summary
• 03:0203:02, 24 January 2016 diff hist +9‎ 2006 Chick-fil-A Bowl ‎No edit summary
• 02:5802:58, 24 January 2016 diff hist −3‎ Talk:A Weekend in the City ‎ →Claims in the introduction - don't seem to be backed up in the main text
• 02:5502:55, 24 January 2016 diff hist +2‎ Vladimir Komarov ‎No edit summary
• 02:5202:52, 24 January 2016 diff hist 0‎ Talk:A Weekend in the City ‎ →Claims in the introduction - don't seem to be backed up in the main text
• 02:5102:51, 24 January 2016 diff hist +100‎ Talk:A Weekend in the City ‎ →Claims in the introduction - don't seem to be backed up in the main text
• 02:4902:49, 24 January 2016 diff hist +122‎ Talk:A Weekend in the City ‎ →Claims in the introduction - don't seem to be backed up in the main text
• 02:4902:49, 24 January 2016 diff hist +798‎ Talk:A Weekend in the City ‎ →Claims in the introduction - don't seem to be backed up in the main text: new section
• 01:5501:55, 24 January 2016 diff hist +106‎ Talk:Helen Keller ‎No edit summary

1 January 2016

• 03:1303:13, 1 January 2016 diff hist +35‎ Bournonville method ‎ →Overview
• 03:1003:10, 1 January 2016 diff hist +17‎ Positions of the feet in ballet ‎ →Lifar's additional positions

21 November 2015

• 22:0222:02, 21 November 2015 diff hist +7‎ Localization (algebra) ‎ →Localization of a ring: ---- I thought the notation previously used referred to the multiplcative group of units of the ring, not merely the set of regular elements (i.e. non-zero divisors)

10 November 2015

• 16:3716:37, 10 November 2015 diff hist 0‎ Ascending chain condition on principal ideals ‎ →References: Corrected bad MR link

4 November 2015

• 13:3613:36, 4 November 2015 diff hist +2‎ Kazimierz Kuratowski ‎ →Research

29 October 2015

• 21:3621:36, 29 October 2015 diff hist −24‎ Algebraic curve ‎ subsection "Number of variables" doesn't exist in article "Polynomial"

28 October 2015

• 17:0517:05, 28 October 2015 diff hist −4‎ Lift (mathematics) ‎No edit summary
• 17:0317:03, 28 October 2015 diff hist −15‎ Lift (mathematics) ‎ Edited to coincide with picture (perhaps it would be best to edit the picture!)

21 October 2015

• 14:3614:36, 21 October 2015 diff hist +24‎ Riemannian manifold ‎ →Overview

6 October 2015

• 19:0119:01, 6 October 2015 diff hist +4‎ History of South Africa ‎ →Pro-German and pro-Nazi attitudes
• 19:0019:00, 6 October 2015 diff hist +6‎ History of South Africa ‎ →Pro-German and pro-Nazi attitudes
• 18:5918:59, 6 October 2015 diff hist +4‎ History of South Africa ‎ →Extra-judicial killings
• 18:4418:44, 6 October 2015 diff hist +4‎ History of South Africa ‎ →Apartheid legislation

5 October 2015

• 17:5617:56, 5 October 2015 diff hist −9‎ Von Neumann regular ring ‎ →Facts
• 17:5617:56, 5 October 2015 diff hist 0‎ Von Neumann regular ring ‎ →Facts

29 September 2015

• 16:5016:50, 29 September 2015 diff hist −1‎ Directed set ‎ →Directed subsets

22 September 2015

• 16:5816:58, 22 September 2015 diff hist −23‎ Ellsberg paradox ‎ →Generality of the paradox: Why is a citation needed? It follows from simple arithmetic!
• 16:5616:56, 22 September 2015 diff hist −16‎ Ellsberg paradox ‎ →Utility theory interpretation: How 'intuitive' this fact is doesn't seem relevant - it is obvious and deterministic

16 September 2015

• 13:4113:41, 16 September 2015 diff hist +9‎ Counterpoint ‎ →Linear counterpoint

26 August 2015

• 21:2421:24, 26 August 2015 diff hist −1‎ Bézout domain ‎ →Properties: and.. I'm done
• 21:2421:24, 26 August 2015 diff hist −1‎ Bézout domain ‎ →Properties: oops..
• 21:2421:24, 26 August 2015 diff hist −131‎ Bézout domain ‎ I don't appreciate what is meant by "the analogy fails to be precise", and there's no clarifying explanation on the edit that added that phrase; the analogy seems clear to me. Also surely the interesting implication is the one that goes the other way!