Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2017 June 16

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 June 24. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 18:59, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:115th United States Senate Roll Call (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was no consensus. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 17:51, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Louisiana State University System presidents (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Two articles fails WP:EXISTING. Corkythehornetfan (ping me) 02:53, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• keep, connects four articles. Frietjes (talk) 20:40, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 17:57, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Fort Valley State University presidents (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

One article fails WP:EXISTING. Corkythehornetfan (ping me) 02:21, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 17:58, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Wilmington University presidents (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

One article fails WP:EXISTING. Corkythehornetfan (ping me) 02:08, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 17:59, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Colorado School of Mines presidents (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

One article... fails WP:EXISTING. Corkythehornetfan (ping me) 02:02, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 18:00, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:University of Arkansas System presidents (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Two articles... fails WP:EXISTING. Corkythehornetfan (ping me) 01:53, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 18:02, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:University of Alabama in Huntsville presidents (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Two links... fails WP:EXISTING. Corkythehornetfan (ping me) 01:50, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 June 24. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 18:03, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Language with name2 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 June 24. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 18:03, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Lang-en-AU (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 June 24. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 18:03, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Lang-en-NZ (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 18:04, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Stat (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

links to non-functional external app Toddst1 (talk) 19:12, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 18:04, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Valga/CKE Inkasso (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

old and unused Frietjes (talk) 13:23, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. by 78.26 per G7 Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 22:07, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:WPANIMATION assessment quality Looney Tunes and Warner Bros. animation work group level (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused Frietjes (talk) 13:03, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Blanked as G7 as the creator. JJ98 (Talk) 21:12, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 18:04, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:InviteSAW (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Invitation for wikiproject that no longer exists Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 05:54, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Looks like it's a copy of Template:Interprovincials Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 18:06, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Inter-Provincials (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

No parent article, no foreseeable use Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 04:41, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 18:07, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Instructions for requested photographs in Hawaii (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, misuse of template space Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 04:41, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Looks like there are no other "Template:Insertimage" Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 18:07, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Insertimage4 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused and ancient warning template. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 04:40, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 18:07, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Intentionally left empty (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, unlikely to be used. Why would an article intentionally need an empty section? Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 04:33, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• delete use a hidden comment, if even needed, so nope68.151.25.115 (talk) 00:45, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 18:08, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Infobox album/Reviews deprecation notice (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, seems to no longer be an issue Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 04:10, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was mark as historical. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 18:13, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Incu-notify (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Incu-notify-del (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Incubate from userfied (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused now that Article Incubator is defunct Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 03:28, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Mark with Template:Historical  The WP:Article incubator has been marked "historical", and its components should also be so marked.  Unscintillating (talk) 14:55, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• move to a subpage of Wikipedia:Article Incubator and mark as historical. Frietjes (talk) 15:32, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was redirect to Template:Overly detailed. Feel free to add extra parameters to Template:Overly detailed, assuming there are no objections there. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 19:00, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Nota bene (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused. I have never seen "nota bene" used in an article, as it seems to go against our citation style. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 01:31, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete; unused. Jc86035 (talk) Use {{re|Jc86035}}
  to reply to me 06:15, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Automatic change to keep if it's added to any articles. Jc86035 (talk) Use {{re|Jc86035}}
    to reply to me 09:07, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • merge it to {{Overly detailed}} then, I guess. Jc86035 (talk) Use {{re|Jc86035}}
    to reply to me 10:59, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Uh, you've never seen {{refn}}? This is used in myriad articles. --Ilovetopaint (talk) 08:44, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Ilovetopaint: But {{Nota bene}} isn't; it has no transclusions. I think it might help if you advertised it in lists of maintenance templates to see if anyone actually uses it, since the main problem is that no one knows it exists. It might also help to rename the template, as I've never seen the phrase "nota bene" used before and it's not the most common borrowed Latin phrase. Jc86035 (talk) Use {{re|Jc86035}}
    to reply to me 09:07, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    How about redirecting it to {{Overly detailed}} and adding an |morefootnotes= parameter that displays alternate text? Actually I like that idea better.--Ilovetopaint (talk) 09:33, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    @Ilovetopaint: Switching the text if parameter |1= is lead or lede might be better. I would add the footnote text to {{Overly detailed}} regardless of whether it's for a section or a whole article, since sometimes it's appropriate. Jc86035 (talk) Use {{re|Jc86035}}
    to reply to me 10:59, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Merge to {{overly detailed}} per above--Ilovetopaint (talk) 09:38, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was no consensus. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 18:25, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Jeremy Sims (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

WP:NENAN and unused Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 00:33, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete; unused. Jc86035 (talk) Use {{re|Jc86035}}
  to reply to me 06:15, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• keep, three films with two more in filming or in production. Frietjes (talk) 21:54, 14 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep per WP:NAVBOX. This navigation template helps readers navigate from one of Jeremy Sims's films to another. There is overwhelming precedent to have these kinds of templates for directors. If it was two films, that can be debatable, but three is a pretty comfortable threshold, considering the assumption that each film article would otherwise have to mention the other two films. Erik (talk | contrib) ^{(ping me)} 18:33, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  To update, the template was indeed being unused for some reason, but Frietjes has since added it to the film articles, essentially putting it into use. That leaves WP:NENAN, and I've already stated the existing precedent to have such templates so readers can cross-navigate between a director's works. The so-called "rule of five" is purely a minority viewpoint and inapplicable for this particular category. Erik (talk | contrib) ^{(ping me)} 19:11, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 18:25, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:HumPath (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused , no proof that this site is a valid site to be linking to. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 02:39, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete unused.--Tom (LT) (talk) 23:32, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 18:25, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:History of San Francisco (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Overly large and very loosely defined template with no criteria for inclusion. Uses informal and vague groupings like "Challenges & Challengers" and "Spaces & Places". Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 01:44, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• delete nothing to do with history and everything tangentially related to san francisco68.151.25.115 (talk) 00:38, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 18:25, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:HistGameinfo (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused and overly specific. There are templates for "storyline" and "speculation", and it's unlikely that an article would have both at the same time. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 01:42, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 18:25, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Hawaiitasks (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused and empty tasklist Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 01:38, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was redirect to Template:Districts of Cairo. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 18:25, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Greater Cairo Region (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, no clear inclusion criteria. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 00:52, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• redirect to Template:Districts of Cairo Frietjes (talk) 20:29, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• merge giza isnt in the other one and there may be more68.151.25.115 (talk) 00:32, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was no consensus. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 18:26, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Graphical timeline of Japan's power nuclear reactors (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused template, inexplicably tagged as article too. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 00:51, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• keep, in use, just added to Nuclear power in Japan --Calvin411 (talk) 19:22, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 18:26, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Glossaries of biology (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, pages are loosely linked at best Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 00:42, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 18:26, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Geological links (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Huge sprawling link farm, not formatted like a template, unused Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 00:39, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G6 by The Anome (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 12:10, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Geodata-request (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused template, untouched since 2010 Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 00:39, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template creator here; can confirm this is unused, please delete. -- The Anome (talk) 20:24, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).