Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/WritersCraftHNU/Archive

WritersCraftHNU (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

Suspected sockpuppets

• Randomchaos64 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• Dawntrook (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• 108.192.96.66 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · proxy check · block user · spi block · block log · cross-wiki contribs · CheckUser (log))
• 67.84.225.223 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · proxy check · block user · spi block · block log · cross-wiki contribs · CheckUser (log))
• User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
• Editor interaction utility

Shortly after WritersCraftHNU was blocked indef. New account RandomChaos64 and IP 67.84.225.223 picked up the editing on Anne F. Walker right where WritersCraftHNU left off, and the only edits of those account are related to Anne F. Walker. Also, RandomChaos64, Dawntrook, and IP 108.192.96.66 all left comments to "keep" the article on the AfD for Anne F. Walker, The latter two's only contributions on Wikipedia. Would like a CheckUser to verify, as this person seems hellbent on making sure this article does not get deleted, and seems to willfully ignore sockpuppet policies, given they've used multiple accounts is such a short time, there may be more. -War wizard90 (talk) 06:32, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Well, as I am just one user I am not sure what to say. I imagine you have technical ways of figuring out that I am just me. Randomchaos64 is my only wikipedia log in. I would say this is a personal attack and hope it will shortly be removed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Randomchaos64 (talk • contribs) 06:44, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

•  Clerk endorsed Randomchaos64 seems interested in adding the same external links ([1], [2], [3]) to the article as WritersCraftHNU. ([4], [5]) Randomchaos64 and Dawntrook have similar !vote rationales that both focus on comparing the article subject to other individuals in the same field ([6] [7]) Mike V • Talk 19:53, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• The folowing accounts are technically indistinguishable.

• WritersCraftHNU (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• WritersCraft (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

However, the other accounts are  Unrelated. PhilKnight (talk) 20:31, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• I've blocked WritersCraft since WritersCraftHNU is blocked and it looks to be a role account that clashes with the username policy. No action taken on the other accounts. Mike V • Talk 20:39, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]