Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/We are The Freaks (film)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:17, 3 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

We are The Freaks (film)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Appears to fail WP:GNG; coverage seems nonexistent. One can't reasonably expect a film still in principal photography to be written about in books, but Google News and Google News archives searches using the term "we are the freaks" film do not bring up anything having to do with the film, much less significant coverage from independent reliable sources. News and archives searches for "we are the freaks" jamie blackley and "we are the freaks" justin edgar similarly bring up nothing of relevance. Due to lack of coverage (at least that I can find) I think this ought to be deleted, and perhaps recreated if or when this film is written about in the news media. Chris the Paleontologist (talk • contribs) 23:53, 26 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Userfy if the article creator so requests to allow the article to be developed with sources. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 01:48, 27 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: I just wanted to make sure that everyone is aware that the original editor has a big COI, being the production company that is currently producing the film so would that impact any chances of the editor userfying this?Tokyogirl79 (talk) 11:01, 27 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no indication that this meets WP:NFILM. In particular, WP:NFF says: "films that have already begun shooting, but have not yet been publicly released (theatres or video), should generally not have their own articles unless the production itself is notable per the notability guidelines." JohnCD (talk) 16:24, 27 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: I have blocked the author, user 104 films (talk · contribs), as an obvious role account here to promote the company's products. JohnCD (talk) 16:24, 27 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:55, 28 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per being premature. Shooting began on March 12. The article tells us the film is "currently under production", and searches find that as a topic, it does not (yet) have anything near the coverage required to merit being a possible excxeption to WP:NFF or qualify for a separate article. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 02:25, 28 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as WP:TOOSOON. Stuartyeates (talk) 06:33, 1 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.