Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vivid Ascent

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. – Juliancolton | ^Talk 02:09, 19 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Vivid Ascent

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

It's been tagged for borderline notability for almost two years. Looks like it probably is not. Lets figure it out. CorporateM (Talk) 14:55, 11 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 16:52, 11 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 16:52, 11 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 16:53, 11 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Appears to fail our general notability guidelines. SarahStierch (talk) 17:07, 11 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per lack of substantial overage in reliable independent sources. Candleabracadabra (talk) 11:43, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.