Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Two Days In The Smoke

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. JohnCD (talk) 13:41, 27 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Two Days In The Smoke

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I tagged this for PROD yesterday, but the article's creator (whose username suggests he is the director) removed the tag, claiming that "All future edits by third parties apart from official poster addition. Also third party references to be added" which may or may not be an admission of COI. Besides, I was not able to find enough independent coverage for the film. All I found were small blurbs in some sites. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 01:26, 13 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:26, 13 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete for now; unreleased film, which might be notable on release (it has a few semi-well-known actors) but as yet has no substantial independent coverage. It may be re-created if the film is released and reviewed. --Colapeninsula (talk) 08:52, 13 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BusterD (talk) 12:53, 20 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

DeleteI couldn't find anything online about this movie that wasn't PR material generated directly by the studio. No evidence of notability.JoelWhy (talk) 13:02, 20 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete/Incubate. Since it's release date is supposed to be relatively soon, with some notable people in it, I don't see anything wrong with incubating it for a while. As it stands now, there isn't enough coverage to show that it passes WP:NFF.Tokyogirl79 (talk) 14:13, 20 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete or Userfy without prejudice toward a return. As this only recently entered principle filming and there is currently a derth of coverage (even with an anticipated release to be in autumn 2012),[1] we can wait until there is more coverage. For now, the article is simply Too Soon. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 03:51, 22 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
DeleteThere appears to be consensus to delete so can an administrator please put this page out of its misery and delete it? Google searches for this film currently pick up this page prominently and this delete conversation is having an obvious unintentional adverse effect. Thank you.Thebenpickering 00:27, 25 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- I have no problem with an early close per WP:SNOW. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 23:55, 24 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.