Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Unreal Story of Professional Wrestling

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Chris Mortensen. Both nom and 2 !voters prefer it redirected which is usually preferred over deletion. (non-admin closure) –Davey2010^Talk 20:25, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The Unreal Story of Professional Wrestling

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet WP:GNG. Only 146 Google results. Out of these, only 1 is a reliable source focusing on the documentary. Zero reviews on Rotten Tomatoes. starship.paint ~ ¡Olé! 12:11, 12 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wrestling-related deletion discussions. starship.paint ~ ¡Olé! 12:11, 12 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. starship.paint ~ ¡Olé! 12:11, 12 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. starship.paint ~ ¡Olé! 12:11, 12 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. There may be coverage, and it may even be in reliable sources, but there's no significant coverage at all. Every source I could find only mentioned this documentary in passing. APerson (talk!) 13:20, 12 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect and mention at the articvle of its director/producer Chris Mortensen. Since so many books and news sources refer to and quote from his documentary film, it can at least be spoken of even if not having the same level of coverage as some big-studio highly-touted blockbuster, specially as it is verifiable as having screened commercially more than 5 years after initial release.Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 13:51, 12 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Just saying, there might not be as many sources as you are presenting it. 3 of the 5 news sources are Bleacher Report blogs. There's only 36 book sources when you click to the end of the Google Books search, and some of them are on "Power Electronics", "Particle Physics" and "Orthopaedics". But I'm fine with a redirect, added a sentence to Mortensen's article. starship.paint ~ ¡Olé! 14:00, 12 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:51, 16 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:03, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Just saying I'll support a redirect to director/producer Chris Mortensen. starship.paint ~ ¡Olé! 03:40, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect - from basic search results, I can tell this is a respected documentary that was the first of its kind. If it had been aired today it probably would have extensive coverage and reviews. But we do need coverage in RS and I just can't find any. —Мандичка^YO 😜 03:42, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.