Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sri Senthil

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. czar 17:01, 29 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sri Senthil

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Insufficient in-depth coverage in multiple RS. There is one sentence in timesofindia.com that says he is "a popular director". That is not enough for WP:GNG. MB 14:48, 22 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. MB 14:48, 22 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. MB 14:48, 22 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - per rationale given by MB , furthermore he fails WP:42 | Celestina007 (talk) 09:23, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
Delete as per nomination; subject is "too soon" re: notability.TH1980 (talk) 23:42, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete because coverage on him is so shallow. I would agree to see if, after a few more days, this film, and its director, gets more coverage. Bearian (talk) 21:00, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
delete the subject fails WP:NCREATIVE, as well as WP:GNG. The article was created by an SPA; who also added himself as notable director six years ago, in the article of film director. Possibly COI or UPE. —usernamekiran(talk) 21:23, 28 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.