Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Min Jung Kim (2nd nomination)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 03:06, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
AfDs for this article:
- Min Jung Kim (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable individual, has been tagged for over 3 years, but nobody has fixed it. Sources are all very trivial and/or not third-party. Otterathome (talk) 12:39, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:44, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:44, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Not notable, at least not yet. The article cites a couple of things from the San Francisco Chronicle - one actually about her, one quoting her - but not enough for notability. I couldn't find a thing in a Google News search - complicated by the fact that she has a very common name. --MelanieN (talk) 01:02, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Agree with nominator's analysis. Finnegas (talk) 19:56, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.