Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2005 June 24

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

June 24

[edit]
  • Undeletion -- This has been posted for undeletion by User:BrandonYusufToropov and seconded by myself. This is a strange case...I've yet to see the original VfD that led this to be labeled as reposted content. I'm beginning to think that this was originally speedied, and people are just jumping on the "reposted" bandwagon without examining the article. I agree it was originally a vanity page (the version now appearing at User:Edip Yuksel), but the current version (yes, apparently someone reposted it yet again...bad users) seems perfectly encyclopedic to me. I will concede it needs a lot of NPOVing, but Brandon attests to the individual's notability. As I have on VfU, I recommend undeletion.
  • Khizar- I too vote for UNDELETION. The article is now perfectly ok according to me as well as neutral. Also this is by no means reposted content. It doesnt resemble old content of yesterday.



Note: This is an archived version of the old vfd closed on June 24. For the new vfd, see Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Edip Yuksel 2 --Ragib 5 July 2005 22:43 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/List of alternative, speculative and disputed theories (2nd nomination)