Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John C. Friend-Pereira
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete.--Húsönd 22:13, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Violates WP:AUTO, creator was John@esib.org (talk · contribs). Contested prod. MER-C 12:32, 11 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. 37 Google hits does not equal notability either. --Folantin 14:22, 11 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom and Folantin: non-notable. Moreschi 15:12, 11 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Do not delete Many other former student union (Union of Students in Ireland)personalities are featured on wikipedia. Indeed many have much less information than that provided by John C. Friend-Pereira's page for example Will Priestly or Joe Duffy. He has repersented his country interntaionally and has been qouted by the EU Observer and the Danish Ministry of Foreign Affiars maoung others. It is clear the John C. Friend-Pereira is still very active in poltics and he been featured in many local papers which do not have on-line versions. Also it is commonly known that he is going to stand for the Labour party in future elections so it makes sense to start a page on him now. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.106.142.170 (talk • contribs)
- Wrong. Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. We don't start articles for things that might be, some time in the future. Please show that this person now satisfies our Wikipedia:Criteria for inclusion of biographies. Uncle G 19:38, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached
Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, W.marsh 16:03, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete While admirable, the subject's contributions have been largely at the university student group and local politics levels. Not enough to merit inclusion, however. Caknuck 16:31, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: non-notable, and refer anon to WP:INN. --Pak21 16:14, 17 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Do not deleteWhile undertsanding the concerns about the future and that most of article relates to college and local politics. This would appear to be at least at the level of other people who's bio's have been accepted namely Will Priestly and Colm Jordan. These people have made equal contributions to society and are very likely to make more if John C. Friend-Pereira is to be considered unsuitable why are these ones ok. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 213.202.161.172 (talk • contribs) .
- Comment: WP:INN --Pak21 17:39, 17 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, I think. Did I miss something here that made this person notable? I can't figure out what he's supposed to be notable for. Usually you can tell - it's someone who's claiming to be a musician, a notable podcaster, etc. Here I don't even see that, so I have to say delete.--TheOtherBob 19:44, 17 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Reads like a resume, "Roninbk" gets more GHits than this guy... --RoninBKETC 10:55, 18 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. WP:NOT a place to post resumés. Sandstein 21:55, 18 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.