Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/IPhone Effect

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was a snowball delete. Acalamari 18:17, 11 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

IPhone Effect (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Tagged for speedying but seems to me not to fit, so I changed it. To me, should be deleted per WP:NEO as it seems to be something someone came up with and is trying to promote Daniel Case 01:35, 11 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Not only does the article fail WP:NEO but all of the sources listed do not mention a relation between the two effects, and two of them don't even cover the price drop. --Michael Greiner 01:50, 11 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete fails WP:NEO. Sasha Callahan 02:15, 11 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, synthesis of sources talking about slightly related things. None of the sources uses the term "iPhone effect". --Dhartung | Talk 04:38, 11 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Silly, insignificant, unpublished concept. - Shiftchange 05:46, 11 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - as WP:NEO. 1redrun ^Talk 08:16, 11 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as NEO. Thin Arthur 08:54, 11 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Unpublished, not notable. • Lawrence Cohen 16:56, 11 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.