Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emergent Payments

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 15:23, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Emergent Payments

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

non notable. the refs are mere notices. The article was almost entirely written by one of a very extensive band of sockpuppets [1], but does not qualify for Speedy G5 because it was started June 10, a few days before the first of the ring were banned. DGG ( talk ) 01:43, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 11:40, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 11:40, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom, WP:SIGCOV, WP:SPAM, and WP:MILL. I'm always suspicious when a stub trumpets a $3M investment in a company (35 years ago I was on the board of a NFP whose annual budget larger than that.) The references are trivial about trivial matters for a trivial company. Bearian (talk) 14:47, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: An article about a company, referenced to coverage of its funding and name-change announcements, which fall under routine coverage at WP:CORPDEPTH. The company was acquired by Emergent Technology Holdings in 2018 but there is no article which could serve as a redirect target. No evidence of attained notability found. AllyD (talk) 17:22, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom - sourcing doesn't meet the required standards. GirthSummit _(blether) 12:23, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.