Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Damian Costilla
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:45, 5 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Damian Costilla (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
WP:N--can't find reliable, secondary sources to establish the notability of this artist under WP:GNG nor WP:ARTIST j⚛e deckertalk 06:29, 23 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:32, 24 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:32, 24 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:32, 24 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. -- SatyrTN (talk / contribs) 07:24, 24 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles 03:49, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Unsourced BLP with no real claim to notability. BLP problems. Lacks coverage in independent reliable sources. duffbeerforme (talk) 07:14, 3 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.