Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Czolgosz & The Vanzettis

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete - Yomangani ^talk 10:58, 22 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Czolgosz & The Vanzettis

No Google hits for Czolgosz Vanzettis or "Big 386 Records". ~~Likely hoax.~~ Unverifiable and likely not to pass WP:MUSIC. Nomination also includes their album. ~ trialsanderrors 08:27, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Update: User:Largely indeterminable informs me that "Go to Sound Idea in Brandon, Florida and you can buy any one their albums." So I changed my nomination to reflect this. ~ trialsanderrors 08:57, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Nothing is verified. --Sbluen 08:41, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
How do I verify then? If it's a localized act and I clearly stated that. Largely indeterminable 08:44, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Look at the WP:MUSIC guideline. Generally the band has to have been talked about by multiple non-trivial secondary sources that aren't related to the band (ie. not blogs, not fans, and not band members or their friends), must have charted on a notable chart (anywhere in the world), must have had multiple releases on a major label, or the like. Most local bands don't meet WP:MUSIC and therefore aren't notable enough to have an article on Wikipedia. Wikipedia isn't for everything that exists; it's for things that are notable and can be verified. --Charlene 08:52, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  - Diabolic, Whole Wheat Bread ...and these people charted did they? I'll find more examples if you want.Largely indeterminable 08:59, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  - I Hate Myself ---> another one. Largely indeterminable 09:12, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    - Then propose them for deletion. Pointing at other non-notable articles to justify your article doesn't say anything one way or the other about the article in question: it just shows that we need to prune some more. --Charlene 11:09, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, no sign of meeting WP:MUSIC. Punkmorten 09:09, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Notability should be easily determined by the contents of the article. Sources should clearly show this. In this article they don't. scope_creep 16:46, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Then prune, delete, erase and circumsize for all I care. I'm going to keep writing the articles on my user page and as soon as I find sources I'll redo the pages. It's a little difficult when the only "source" you people would accept would be my father's obituary that doesn't even mention the band. Guess what shut-ins? Not everything of importance out there will produce your precious Google hits. For all the fascism and sterility of this site we may as well be Britanicca. And call those personal attacks all you want, I was speaking in general.Largely indeterminable 07:01, 17 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.