Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cassiopean

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. --Phroziac^(talk) 18:31, 16 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nomination. This is a pure vanity page written by someone who appears to be a self-published author. It contains the author's own points of view, in the same sense that one would expect to see on a personal webpage. It does not belong on Wikipedia, IMO. - Sensor 02:13, 12 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - this might be a valid subject and not simply vanity, if the article was edited down to remove the lengthy POV rambling, and stuck strictly to objective description of the movement AND if this esoteric movement or cult or countercultural group and the history it claims on the website can be proved to actually exist, AND if it can be shown that this group or this set of beliefs have some cultural status. Otherwise, delete. Bwithh 04:25, 12 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Unverifiable. Sources are not convincing. Walter Siegmund 05:02, 12 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as OR. This does not appear to be an account of parapsychological research or ufology, but simply the author's own research or opinion. MCB 05:27, 12 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, OR personal ramblings. the wub "?!" 19:57, 12 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete I don't even think the information in this article is acurate. I also agree with all the above. Tobyk777 00:41, 13 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete The article is a mess, but more importantly, while the term has some usage in the mythological lore of of Ufology, it doesn't have as wide of a dispersal in that community as concepts like Reticulan, Lyrian, Reptoid, and Andromedans. Some of those terms are fairly common among alien race "true believers" and Cassiopean appears to fall below the notability threshhold of those terms.--Isotope23 13:36, 13 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Vanity and unverified. *drew 06:44, 14 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.