Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cannon Trading Company, Inc.
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 23:56, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Cannon Trading Company, Inc. (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:COMPANY. No good sources. Clarityfiend (talk) 23:59, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Finance, Companies, and California. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 00:22, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Keep and improve : Seeing the sources listed not sure where the subject is notable. Better to incubate in draftspace.Nirmalburlakoti (talk) 06:58, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment could be considered for deletion if it lacks sufficient independent, reliable sources that establish its notability under Wikipedia's guidelines. If the content primarily consists of promotional material or fails to demonstrate significant industry coverage --Moarnighar (talk) 11:03, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Keep and improve : Seeing the sources listed not sure where the subject is notable. Better to incubate in draftspace.Nirmalburlakoti (talk) 06:58, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Delete: I'm not finding any immediate SIGCOV sufficient to meet CORPDEPTH. They apparently do business as E-FUTURES dot COM, and E-MINI dot COM[1] (which use annoyingly generic terms), in which case there may be reliable independent reviews somewhere to meet WP:NPRODUCT -- but it's likely not for us to do that level of digging). The sources in there with the exception of the Trader Planet award are either not independent or trivial, and the award is not sufficiently notable (and voting is definitely not properly selective). ~Hydronium~Hydroxide~(Talk)~ 11:13, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 23:14, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Delete. The coverage is either primary source/non-independent, or it is WP:ORGTRIV. Don't see anything to get it across WP:NCORP. Dclemens1971 (talk) 16:40, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.