Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/British Family (unofficial TV series)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. (non-admin closure) — ^Wylie_Coyote 15:47, 8 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

British Family (unofficial TV series)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails notability tests - work is not completed, not commissioned and not widely covered in mainstream sources. GimliDotNet^{(Speak to me,Stuff I've done)} 15:30, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. --Nat Gertler (talk) 16:40, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:CRYSTAL. At this point it is only a proposed series that may never be produced.Blue Riband► 22:24, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete "Its plans are to produce two 30 minute long episodes and pitch the TV series idea to 20th Century Fox"...who will toss it right in the trash because every writer knows studios don't take unsolicited script ideas, especially from British schoolchildren. WP:MADEUP and it looks like the school's webmaster put the kibosh on hosting the 'show site'. Nate • (chatter) 23:46, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete School project with no coverage in reliable sources. --Colapeninsula (talk) 16:57, 3 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
KeepI am sorry to have miss lead into the idea that kids are running this project. The school is a well known academy in preforming arts that have facilities of grate interest with a professional recording studio, high quality editing graphic software and other facilities has agreed to let Jake Mason Productions base the pre-production British Family in the rooms of H13-H15 as well as the recording studio.User:Timwilliam20 — Timwilliam20 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
Delete Not notable. --Sue Rangell ✍ ✉ 23:01, 3 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom and all of the above other deletes. Gogo Dodo (talk) 17:28, 5 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as unnotable. . . Mean as custard (talk) 13:12, 7 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Snow delete A show that a local performing arts school plans to pitch to a studio? We would need the biggest crystal ball in history to foresee the notability of this project. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 14:12, 7 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
For the last time it is not made by the school, Jake Mason Productions are renting the rooms h13-h15 and recording studio— Preceding unsigned comment added by Timwilliams20 (talk • contribs)

that still doesn't make it notable. . . Mean as custard (talk) 14:35, 7 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:48, 7 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:48, 7 December 2012 (UTC)*[reply]

The page is notable as the project has started and it will be aired in 2015 but the production will move to FOX for the second half of season 1 if they win the pitch— Preceding unsigned comment added by Timwilliams20 (talk • contribs)
Keep the page it is notable I have heard about the show as I live in somerset and I have even done some editing on the aritcal user: Samdepp5— Samdepp5 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.

Keep this article is notable user: ronnutt

Blocked as a sockpuppet. Reaper Eternal (talk) 20:34, 7 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as per all the above, including WP:TOOSOON. — ^Wylie_Coyote 00:31, 8 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per above. I would also like to add recently created Jake Mason (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)to the AfD (the planned director of the planned film). Travelbird (talk) 09:29, 8 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Jake Mason doesn't need AfD consideration at this point; it has been speedied repeatedly, and is now salted. --Nat Gertler (talk) 15:25, 8 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete All of the above. However, if the series does (though it almost definitely won't) get through to Fox then it would be notable. Passengerpigeon (talk) 09:42, 8 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I was tempted to {{speedy}} delete, for which the article clearly qualifies, but as this page has so many posts will let it run.--Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 12:01, 8 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comment as the original nominator I was going to speedy it, but it doesn't really fit any of the criteria. GimliDotNet^{(Speak to me,Stuff I've done)} 12:04, 8 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete . Too soon, and Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. It can have an article when - if ever - it exists. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 13:46, 8 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.